Skip to content

[Backport 2.7] Dynamic tenancy configurations#1405

Closed
RyanL1997 wants to merge 1 commit intoopensearch-project:2.7from
RyanL1997:mt-feature-backport-2.7
Closed

[Backport 2.7] Dynamic tenancy configurations#1405
RyanL1997 wants to merge 1 commit intoopensearch-project:2.7from
RyanL1997:mt-feature-backport-2.7

Conversation

@RyanL1997
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Dynamic tenancy configurations

Category

[Enhancement, New feature, Bug fix, Test fix, Refactoring, Maintenance, Documentation]

Why these changes are required?

What is the old behavior before changes and new behavior after changes?

Issues Resolved

[List any issues this PR will resolve (Is this a backport? If so, please add backport PR # and/or commits #)]

Testing

[Please provide details of testing done: unit testing, integration testing and manual testing]

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing
  • New functionality has been documented
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

* Dynamic multitenancy feature.

Signed-off-by: Abhi Kalra <abhivka@amazon.com>

* Dynamic multitenancy feature -PR feedback

Signed-off-by: Abhi Kalra <abhivka@amazon.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Abhi Kalra <abhivka@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: Abhi Kalra <abhivka@amazon.com>
@RyanL1997 RyanL1997 changed the title [Backport 2.7] Mt feature backport 2.7 [Backport 2.7] [Manual Backport 2.7] Dynamic tenancy configurations Apr 17, 2023
@stephen-crawford stephen-crawford changed the title [Backport 2.7] [Manual Backport 2.7] Dynamic tenancy configurations [Backport 2.7] Dynamic tenancy configurations Apr 17, 2023
@stephen-crawford stephen-crawford mentioned this pull request Apr 17, 2023
@RyanL1997 RyanL1997 closed this Apr 18, 2023
@RyanL1997
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closing this one on behalf of the merging of #1404

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants