Crash at login on Qemu #123
Comments
|
This is in similar territory to #101 |
|
moved to openbmc/qemu openbmc/qemu#11 |
shenki
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 4, 2019
[ Upstream commit a9fd095 ] Leaving dev_init_lock mutex locked in probe causes BUG and a WARNING when kernel is compiled with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING. Convert mutex to completion which silences those warnings and improves code readability. Fix below errors when connecting the USB WiFi dongle: brcmfmac: brcmf_fw_alloc_request: using brcm/brcmfmac43143 for chip BCM43143/2 BUG: workqueue leaked lock or atomic: kworker/0:2/0x00000000/434 last function: hub_event 1 lock held by kworker/0:2/434: #0: 18d5dcdf (&devinfo->dev_init_lock){+.+.}, at: brcmf_usb_probe+0x78/0x550 [brcmfmac] CPU: 0 PID: 434 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 4.19.23-00084-g454a789-dirty #123 Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree) Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event [<8011237c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<8010d74c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<8010d74c>] (show_stack) from [<809c4324>] (dump_stack+0xa8/0xd4) [<809c4324>] (dump_stack) from [<8014195c>] (process_one_work+0x710/0x808) [<8014195c>] (process_one_work) from [<80141a80>] (worker_thread+0x2c/0x564) [<80141a80>] (worker_thread) from [<80147bcc>] (kthread+0x13c/0x16c) [<80147bcc>] (kthread) from [<801010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20) Exception stack(0xed1d9fb0 to 0xed1d9ff8) 9fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 9fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 9fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.19.23-00084-g454a789-dirty #123 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:2/434 is trying to acquire lock: e29cf799 ((wq_completion)"events"){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x174/0x808 but task is already holding lock: 18d5dcdf (&devinfo->dev_init_lock){+.+.}, at: brcmf_usb_probe+0x78/0x550 [brcmfmac] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&devinfo->dev_init_lock){+.+.}: mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24 brcmf_usb_probe+0x78/0x550 [brcmfmac] usb_probe_interface+0xc0/0x1bc really_probe+0x228/0x2c0 __driver_attach+0xe4/0xe8 bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0xb4 bus_add_driver+0x19c/0x214 driver_register+0x78/0x110 usb_register_driver+0x84/0x148 process_one_work+0x228/0x808 worker_thread+0x2c/0x564 kthread+0x13c/0x16c ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20 (null) -> #1 (brcmf_driver_work){+.+.}: worker_thread+0x2c/0x564 kthread+0x13c/0x16c ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20 (null) -> #0 ((wq_completion)"events"){+.+.}: process_one_work+0x1b8/0x808 worker_thread+0x2c/0x564 kthread+0x13c/0x16c ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20 (null) other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)"events" --> brcmf_driver_work --> &devinfo->dev_init_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&devinfo->dev_init_lock); lock(brcmf_driver_work); lock(&devinfo->dev_init_lock); lock((wq_completion)"events"); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by kworker/0:2/434: #0: 18d5dcdf (&devinfo->dev_init_lock){+.+.}, at: brcmf_usb_probe+0x78/0x550 [brcmfmac] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 434 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 4.19.23-00084-g454a789-dirty #123 Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree) Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func [<8011237c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<8010d74c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<8010d74c>] (show_stack) from [<809c4324>] (dump_stack+0xa8/0xd4) [<809c4324>] (dump_stack) from [<80172838>] (print_circular_bug+0x210/0x330) [<80172838>] (print_circular_bug) from [<80175940>] (__lock_acquire+0x160c/0x1a30) [<80175940>] (__lock_acquire) from [<8017671c>] (lock_acquire+0xe0/0x268) [<8017671c>] (lock_acquire) from [<80141404>] (process_one_work+0x1b8/0x808) [<80141404>] (process_one_work) from [<80141a80>] (worker_thread+0x2c/0x564) [<80141a80>] (worker_thread) from [<80147bcc>] (kthread+0x13c/0x16c) [<80147bcc>] (kthread) from [<801010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20) Exception stack(0xed1d9fb0 to 0xed1d9ff8) 9fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 9fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 9fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 Signed-off-by: Piotr Figiel <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
shenki
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 31, 2022
commit 380a009 upstream. We got issue as follows when run syzkaller: [ 167.936972] EXT4-fs error (device loop0): __ext4_remount:6314: comm rep: Abort forced by user [ 167.938306] EXT4-fs (loop0): Remounting filesystem read-only [ 167.981637] Assertion failure in ext4_getblk() at fs/ext4/inode.c:847: '(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_mount_state & EXT4_FC_REPLAY) || handle != NULL || create == 0' [ 167.983601] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 167.984245] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:847! [ 167.984882] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI [ 167.985624] CPU: 7 PID: 2290 Comm: rep Tainted: G B 5.16.0-rc5-next-20211217+ #123 [ 167.986823] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014 [ 167.988590] RIP: 0010:ext4_getblk+0x17e/0x504 [ 167.989189] Code: c6 01 74 28 49 c7 c0 a0 a3 5c 9b b9 4f 03 00 00 48 c7 c2 80 9c 5c 9b 48 c7 c6 40 b6 5c 9b 48 c7 c7 20 a4 5c 9b e8 77 e3 fd ff <0f> 0b 8b 04 244 [ 167.991679] RSP: 0018:ffff8881736f7398 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 167.992385] RAX: 0000000000000094 RBX: 1ffff1102e6dee75 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 167.993337] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff9b6e29e0 RDI: ffffed102e6dee66 [ 167.994292] RBP: ffff88816a076210 R08: 0000000000000094 R09: ffffed107363fa09 [ 167.995252] R10: ffff88839b1fd047 R11: ffffed107363fa08 R12: ffff88816a0761e8 [ 167.996205] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000021 R15: 0000000000000001 [ 167.997158] FS: 00007f6a1428c740(0000) GS:ffff88839b000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 167.998238] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 167.999025] CR2: 00007f6a140716c8 CR3: 0000000133216000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 167.999987] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 168.000944] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 168.001899] Call Trace: [ 168.002235] <TASK> [ 168.007167] ext4_bread+0xd/0x53 [ 168.007612] ext4_quota_write+0x20c/0x5c0 [ 168.010457] write_blk+0x100/0x220 [ 168.010944] remove_free_dqentry+0x1c6/0x440 [ 168.011525] free_dqentry.isra.0+0x565/0x830 [ 168.012133] remove_tree+0x318/0x6d0 [ 168.014744] remove_tree+0x1eb/0x6d0 [ 168.017346] remove_tree+0x1eb/0x6d0 [ 168.019969] remove_tree+0x1eb/0x6d0 [ 168.022128] qtree_release_dquot+0x291/0x340 [ 168.023297] v2_release_dquot+0xce/0x120 [ 168.023847] dquot_release+0x197/0x3e0 [ 168.024358] ext4_release_dquot+0x22a/0x2d0 [ 168.024932] dqput.part.0+0x1c9/0x900 [ 168.025430] __dquot_drop+0x120/0x190 [ 168.025942] ext4_clear_inode+0x86/0x220 [ 168.026472] ext4_evict_inode+0x9e8/0xa22 [ 168.028200] evict+0x29e/0x4f0 [ 168.028625] dispose_list+0x102/0x1f0 [ 168.029148] evict_inodes+0x2c1/0x3e0 [ 168.030188] generic_shutdown_super+0xa4/0x3b0 [ 168.030817] kill_block_super+0x95/0xd0 [ 168.031360] deactivate_locked_super+0x85/0xd0 [ 168.031977] cleanup_mnt+0x2bc/0x480 [ 168.033062] task_work_run+0xd1/0x170 [ 168.033565] do_exit+0xa4f/0x2b50 [ 168.037155] do_group_exit+0xef/0x2d0 [ 168.037666] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3a/0x50 [ 168.038237] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 [ 168.038751] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae In order to reproduce this problem, the following conditions need to be met: 1. Ext4 filesystem with no journal; 2. Filesystem image with incorrect quota data; 3. Abort filesystem forced by user; 4. umount filesystem; As in ext4_quota_write: ... if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_journal && !handle) { ext4_msg(sb, KERN_WARNING, "Quota write (off=%llu, len=%llu)" " cancelled because transaction is not started", (unsigned long long)off, (unsigned long long)len); return -EIO; } ... We only check handle if NULL when filesystem has journal. There is need check handle if NULL even when filesystem has no journal. Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Linux version 4.7.10-e62c7f11175525c028d9a6abaf6a2a5c275664d1 (jenkins@hudson) (gcc version 5.3.0 (GCC) ) #1 Wed Nov 16 04:25:06 UTC 2016The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: