Skip to content

Polkadot v0.9.17 #705

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
xlc merged 7 commits into from
Feb 28, 2022
Merged

Polkadot v0.9.17 #705

xlc merged 7 commits into from
Feb 28, 2022

Conversation

@zqhxuyuan
Copy link
Contributor

@zqhxuyuan zqhxuyuan commented Feb 25, 2022

  • update to v0.9.17
  • update serde

zqhxuyuan
zqhxuyuan commented Feb 25, 2022
View reviewed changes
@zqhxuyuan zqhxuyuan requested review from shaunxw, xlc and zjb0807 February 25, 2022 01:08
shaunxw
shaunxw reviewed Feb 25, 2022
View reviewed changes
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 25, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #705 (f5bdc5f) into master (f8f6f82) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #705   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.70%   74.70%           
=======================================
  Files          83       83           
  Lines        7282     7282           
=======================================
  Hits         5440     5440           
  Misses       1842     1842
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
bencher/src/bench_runner.rs 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
benchmarking/src/lib.rs 31.81% <0.00%> (ø)
vesting/src/mock.rs 100.00% <ø> (ø)
xtokens/src/mock/para.rs 73.33% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f8f6f82...f5bdc5f. Read the comment docs.

@stanly-johnson stanly-johnson mentioned this pull request Feb 27, 2022
Closed
@xlc xlc merged commit aac79b3 into master Feb 28, 2022
@xlc xlc deleted the polkadot-v0.9.17 branch February 28, 2022 01:16
zqhxuyuan added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2022
@zqhxuyuan
Revert "Polkadot v0.9.17 (#705)"
dba578f 
This reverts commit aac79b3.
@mrq1911 mrq1911 mentioned this pull request Feb 28, 2022
Closed
1 task
zqhxuyuan added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2022
@zqhxuyuan
Revert "Revert "Polkadot v0.9.17 (#705)""
cf3d8aa 
This reverts commit dba578f.
shaunxw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2022
@zqhxuyuan
use relaychain asset as fee (#700)
0a5a2df 
* support relaychain as fee

* add weight

* clean and comment

* clean

* use non fee asset as reserve

* update

* clippy

* update weight

* too many fee

* two xcm and split fee

* clean

* fix tests

* more test

* clippy

* fmt

* remove FeeNotEnough

* clean

* add parachain min fee setting

* more test and some limitation

* some notes

* fmt

* Revert "Polkadot v0.9.17 (#705)"

This reverts commit aac79b3.

* update comments

* Revert "Revert "Polkadot v0.9.17 (#705)""

This reverts commit dba578f.

* fix

* update README and add FeeNotEnough Error
syan095 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2022
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into nft/extend-trait
9d1acb8 
* origin/master:
  use relaychain asset as fee (#700)
  Polkadot v0.9.17 (#705)
  XTokens refactor (#706)
  Add a test for cliff vesting (#702)
  Girazoki fix index in transfer multicurrencies (#696)
@zqhxuyuan zqhxuyuan restored the polkadot-v0.9.17 branch May 31, 2022 01:35
@zqhxuyuan zqhxuyuan mentioned this pull request May 31, 2022
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@xlc xlc xlc approved these changes

@shaunxw shaunxw shaunxw approved these changes

@zjb0807 zjb0807 Awaiting requested review from zjb0807

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@zqhxuyuan @codecov-commenter @xlc @shaunxw