-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Code coverage integration in SRF #105
Conversation
…out Jenkins details
Co-authored-by: David Gardner <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a great addition.
My only requested change is to add directions on we should be using it in the CONTRIBUTING.md.
…over header only code not compiled into srf/pysrf
Co-authored-by: David Gardner <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The more CI stages the merrier!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that the CMake configuration could be simplified and we should consider options that reduce the duplicate CI work. i.e. Do we need to build in both debug and release? Do we need to test in both debug and release?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good now
@gpucibot merge |
Steps to test/experiment:
debug
mode withSRF_WITH_CODECOV=ON
cd ./build && ctest && pytest ./python/tests
cmake --build ./build --target gcovr-html-report
xdg-open ./build/gcovr-html-report/index.html