Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

punycode: update to v1.3.2 #6

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

punycode: update to v1.3.2 #6

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mathiasbynens
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Nov 28, 2014

Sweet! LGTM.

Can we have a high-level summary of what this gets us? I see some regex tweaks and domain changes in there.

@mathiasbynens
Copy link
Contributor Author

  • Email address support in toASCII and toUnicode
  • punycode.ucs2.encode now no longer mutates the codePoints argument
  • Ensure trailing . in domain names are preserved
  • Some minor code cleanup + bug fixes

@indutny
Copy link
Member

indutny commented Nov 28, 2014

@mathiasbynens could this be put in a commit message? ;)

Changes since v1.2.3:

* Email address support in `toASCII` and `toUnicode`
* `punycode.ucs2.encode` now no longer mutates the `codePoints`
  argument
* Ensure trailing `.` in domain names are preserved
* Some minor code cleanup + bug fixes
@mathiasbynens
Copy link
Contributor Author

@indutny Done.

I gotta say, I’m impressed by the swift responses! 👍

@indutny
Copy link
Member

indutny commented Nov 28, 2014

This is just a coincidence, don't get used to it ;)

Anyway, thank you very much!

indutny pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2014
Changes since v1.2.3:

* Email address support in `toASCII` and `toUnicode`
* `punycode.ucs2.encode` now no longer mutates the `codePoints`
  argument
* Ensure trailing `.` in domain names are preserved
* Some minor code cleanup + bug fixes

Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #6
@indutny
Copy link
Member

indutny commented Nov 28, 2014

Landed in 232c4c2, thank you!

@indutny indutny closed this Nov 28, 2014
@dmitryame dmitryame mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2016
minervapanda pushed a commit to minervapanda/node that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2016
@rdkgit rdkgit mentioned this pull request Nov 11, 2016
jasongin pushed a commit to jasongin/nodejs that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2016
@myitcv myitcv mentioned this pull request Aug 1, 2017
targos referenced this pull request in targos/node Apr 17, 2021
Original commit message:

    Merged: [wasm-simd][x64] Check for register when emitting shuffles

    Some shuffles take have either register or memory operand for second
    input, but the codegen incorrectly assumes that it is always a register.

    Bug: v8:10824
    (cherry picked from commit ddf30bea13902829eeb71aa0ec747155e27e5a68)

    Change-Id: I897c4290a8b91ff2ab839e98b16a9696c0bae511
    No-Try: true
    No-Presubmit: true
    No-Tree-Checks: true
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2391280
    Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <[email protected]>
    Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <[email protected]>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/8.6@{#6}
    Cr-Branched-From: a64aed2333abf49e494d2a5ce24bbd14fff19f60-refs/heads/8.6.395@{#1}
    Cr-Branched-From: a626bc036236c9bf92ac7b87dc40c9e538b087e3-refs/heads/master@{#69472}

Refs: v8/v8@516b5d3
targos referenced this pull request in targos/node Apr 27, 2021
Original commit message:

    Merged: [wasm-simd][x64] Check for register when emitting shuffles

    Some shuffles take have either register or memory operand for second
    input, but the codegen incorrectly assumes that it is always a register.

    Bug: v8:10824
    (cherry picked from commit ddf30bea13902829eeb71aa0ec747155e27e5a68)

    Change-Id: I897c4290a8b91ff2ab839e98b16a9696c0bae511
    No-Try: true
    No-Presubmit: true
    No-Tree-Checks: true
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2391280
    Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <[email protected]>
    Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <[email protected]>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/8.6@{#6}
    Cr-Branched-From: a64aed2333abf49e494d2a5ce24bbd14fff19f60-refs/heads/8.6.395@{#1}
    Cr-Branched-From: a626bc036236c9bf92ac7b87dc40c9e538b087e3-refs/heads/master@{#69472}

Refs: v8/v8@516b5d3
targos added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2021
Original commit message:

    Merged: [wasm-simd][x64] Check for register when emitting shuffles

    Some shuffles take have either register or memory operand for second
    input, but the codegen incorrectly assumes that it is always a register.

    Bug: v8:10824
    (cherry picked from commit ddf30bea13902829eeb71aa0ec747155e27e5a68)

    Change-Id: I897c4290a8b91ff2ab839e98b16a9696c0bae511
    No-Try: true
    No-Presubmit: true
    No-Tree-Checks: true
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2391280
    Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <[email protected]>
    Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <[email protected]>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/8.6@{#6}
    Cr-Branched-From: a64aed2333abf49e494d2a5ce24bbd14fff19f60-refs/heads/8.6.395@{#1}
    Cr-Branched-From: a626bc036236c9bf92ac7b87dc40c9e538b087e3-refs/heads/master@{#69472}

Refs: v8/v8@516b5d3

PR-URL: #38275
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <[email protected]>
@alirezaraha3 alirezaraha3 mentioned this pull request Sep 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants