[v12.x backport] deps: V8: cherry-pick eec10a2fd8fa and #34008 #34776

Flarna · 2020-08-14T11:58:18Z

Backport #33778 and #34008 to v12.

There was already a backport PR (#34300) for #33778 but it was removed during creation of 12.18.3 as it looked like it breaks gulp tests on MacOs.

Later it turned out that gulp tests were broken already before therefore I see no reason anymore to not backport this to v12.

In this backport PR I added additionally #34008 which is just a new test to verify the backported fix.

see comments at #33778 (comment)

fyi @Qard, @MylesBorins

Refs: #33778
Refs: #34008
Refs: #34300
Refs: #34343

MylesBorins · 2020-08-14T13:45:20Z

@Flarna I think that we should do some tests before landing this and confirm where the breakages were coming from. While some of the tests were already broken #34008 ended up breaking more stuff unfortunately.

Qard

LGTM, assuming we can verify the source of the test issue, as Myles suggests.

Flarna · 2020-08-14T16:30:10Z

started my first debug session on a Mac :o)
executed test of module glob-watcher. They fail consistent since 12.18.2 with an abort in uv_close. it's not always the same test so I assume it's some race.
With this PR included the probability seems to increase and it fails earlier.
The callstack looks equal with and without this PR:

* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = signal SIGABRT
  * frame #0: 0x00007fff7fe982c2 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__pthread_kill + 10
    frame #1: 0x00007fff7ff53bf1 libsystem_pthread.dylib`pthread_kill + 284
    frame #2: 0x00007fff7fe026a6 libsystem_c.dylib`abort + 127
    frame #3: 0x00007fff7fdcb20d libsystem_c.dylib`__assert_rtn + 324
    frame #4: 0x00000001010c7742 node`uv_close(handle=0x0000000105301988, close_cb=0x0000000000000000) at core.c:178:5
    frame #5: 0x0000000104fef195 fse.node`fse::FSEvents::Stop(Nan::FunctionCallbackInfo<v8::Value> const&) [inlined] fse::FSEvents::asyncStop(this=<unavailable>) at async.cc:42:3 [opt]
    frame #6: 0x0000000104fef17a fse.node`fse::FSEvents::Stop(info=0x00007ffeefbfe738) at methods.cc:33 [opt]
    frame #7: 0x0000000104ff059d fse.node`Nan::imp::FunctionCallbackWrapper(info=0x00007ffeefbfe7c0) at nan_callbacks_12_inl.h:176:3 [opt]
    frame #8: 0x00000001005b1ef8 node`v8::internal::FunctionCallbackArguments::Call(this=0x00007ffeefbfe828, handler=<unavailable>) at api-arguments-inl.h:158:3 [opt]
    frame #9: 0x00000001005b03c0 node`v8::internal::MaybeHandle<v8::internal::Object> v8::internal::(anonymous namespace)::HandleApiCallHelper<false>(isolate=0x0000000104f44000, function=<unavailable>, new_target=<unavailable>, fun_data=<unavailable>, receiver=<unavailable>, args=BuiltinArguments @ 0x00007ffeefbfe8e0) at builtins-api.cc:111:36 [opt]
    frame #10: 0x00000001005ae6f3 node`v8::internal::Builtin_Impl_HandleApiCall(args=BuiltinArguments @ 0x00007ffeefbfe910, isolate=0x0000000104f44000) at builtins-api.cc:141:5 [opt]
    frame #11: 0x00000001005ae14c node`v8::internal::Builtin_HandleApiCall(args_length=5, args_object=0x00007ffeefbfea58, isolate=0x0000000104f44000) at builtins-api.cc:129:1 [opt]
    frame #12: 0x00000001013e3060 node`Builtins_CEntry_Return1_DontSaveFPRegs_ArgvOnStack_BuiltinExit + 64
    frame #13: 0x0000000101107a55 node`Builtins_InterpreterEntryTrampoline + 949
    frame #14: 0x0000000101107a55 node`Builtins_InterpreterEntryTrampoline + 949
    frame #15: 0x0000000101107a55 node`Builtins_InterpreterEntryTrampoline + 949
    frame #16: 0x000000010144d359 node`Builtins_ArrayForEach + 5113
    frame #17: 0x0000000101107a55 node`Builtins_InterpreterEntryTrampoline + 949
    frame #18: 0x000000010144d359 node`Builtins_ArrayForEach + 5113
    frame #19: 0x0000000101107a55 node`Builtins_InterpreterEntryTrampoline + 949
    frame #20: 0x0000000101107a55 node`Builtins_InterpreterEntryTrampoline + 949
    frame #21: 0x0000000101107a55 node`Builtins_InterpreterEntryTrampoline + 949
    frame #22: 0x0000000101107a55 node`Builtins_InterpreterEntryTrampoline + 949
    frame #23: 0x0000000101107a55 node`Builtins_InterpreterEntryTrampoline + 949
    frame #24: 0x0000000101107a55 node`Builtins_InterpreterEntryTrampoline + 949
    frame #25: 0x0000000101107a55 node`Builtins_InterpreterEntryTrampoline + 949
    frame #26: 0x0000000101107a55 node`Builtins_InterpreterEntryTrampoline + 949
    frame #27: 0x0000000101107a55 node`Builtins_InterpreterEntryTrampoline + 949
    frame #28: 0x00000001010f9dfd node`Builtins_JSEntryTrampoline + 93
    frame #29: 0x00000001010f9bd8 node`Builtins_JSEntry + 120
    frame #30: 0x00000001007190b3 node`v8::internal::(anonymous namespace)::Invoke(v8::internal::Isolate*, v8::internal::(anonymous namespace)::InvokeParams const&) [inlined] v8::internal::GeneratedCode<unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long, long, unsigned long**>::Call(this=<unavailable>, args=<unavailable>, args=<unavailable>, args=<unavailable>, args=<unavailable>, args=<unavailable>, args=<unavailable>) at simulator.h:136:12 [opt]
    frame #31: 0x00000001007190aa node`v8::internal::(anonymous namespace)::Invoke(isolate=0x0000000104f44000, params=<unavailable>)::InvokeParams const&) at execution.cc:266 [opt]
    frame #32: 0x00000001007189e4 node`v8::internal::Execution::Call(isolate=0x0000000104f44000, callable=<unavailable>, receiver=<unavailable>, argc=2, argv=0x00007ffeefbff488) at execution.cc:358:10 [opt]
    frame #33: 0x00000001004ffd8b node`v8::Function::Call(this=0x000000010603b1a0, context=<unavailable>, recv=<unavailable>, argc=2, argv=0x00007ffeefbff488) at api.cc:4917:7 [opt]
    frame #34: 0x000000010000327c node`node::InternalMakeCallback(env=0x000000010603a000, resource=(val_ = 0x000000010603b020), recv=(val_ = 0x000000010603b020), callback=(val_ = 0x000000010603b320), argc=0, argv=0x0000000000000000, asyncContext=(async_id = 0, trigger_async_id = 0)) at callback.cc:185:20
    frame #35: 0x0000000100003a10 node`node::MakeCallback(isolate=0x0000000104f44000, recv=(val_ = 0x000000010603b020), callback=(val_ = 0x000000010603b320), argc=0, argv=0x0000000000000000, asyncContext=(async_id = 0, trigger_async_id = 0)) at callback.cc:248:7
    frame #36: 0x000000010008c2fc node`node::Environment::CheckImmediate(handle=0x000000010603a198) at env.cc:828:5
    frame #37: 0x00000001010d2ed8 node`uv__run_check(loop=0x0000000102ced620) at loop-watcher.c:67:1
    frame #38: 0x00000001010c7c08 node`uv_run(loop=0x0000000102ced620, mode=UV_RUN_DEFAULT) at core.c:382:5
    frame #39: 0x00000001001f4654 node`node::NodeMainInstance::Run(this=0x00007ffeefbff8d0) at node_main_instance.cc:129:9
    frame #40: 0x00000001000f89f4 node`node::Start(argc=3, argv=0x00007ffeefbffa70) at node.cc:995:38
    frame #41: 0x0000000101a1115e node`main(argc=3, argv=0x00007ffeefbffa70) at node_main.cc:126:10
    frame #42: 0x00007fff7fd5d3d5 libdyld.dylib`start + 1

Flarna · 2020-08-14T18:11:55Z

I did an experiment and added the commits from this PR on top of 12.18.1. gulp and glob-watcher tests are green then.

So I still don't know the root cause of the failures introduced in 12.18.2 but the changes from this PR seems to be ok.

Flarna · 2020-08-14T18:44:34Z

The fsevents version (1.2.13) used by glob-watcher users a Nan::AsyncResource. My gut feeling tells that this is related.
Will investigate further and try to get a reproducer on an OS which is easier for me to work on. But this is a separate task then this PR.

Flarna · 2020-08-14T23:50:49Z

Did some more investigations. Looks like the problem is a missing initialization of this uv_async_t as this may result in this check to return true resulting in not calling uv_async_init().

If I add memset(&async, 0, sizeof(async)) here the crashes are gone (including the segfaults seen before 14.5.0).

nodejs-github-bot · 2020-08-14T23:56:38Z

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/32796/

Qard · 2020-08-15T00:29:08Z

The correct thing to do would be to not use the uv_async_t until after it is initialized with uv_async_init(...). The pattern of checking async.data and reinitializing the same object is probably not safe. If it reinitializes while it is still in-use that could cause some chaos too.

MylesBorins · 2020-08-18T01:59:32Z

Is this ready to land? How does it differ from what we landed on master / v14.x?

Qard · 2020-08-18T02:19:07Z

@MylesBorins It's really just a very small difference in the the patch contents. Functionally they are identical.

Master: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/33778/files#diff-d047841e5be2101da57516c10fabb17c
This: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/34776/files#diff-d047841e5be2101da57516c10fabb17c

V8 changed to use ScopedExceptionHandler in a block rather than GotoIfException(...) on the next line.

Flarna · 2020-08-18T06:01:01Z

Yes, it's more or less the same as on master/v14. Backport PR was needed because the patch didn't land clean.

I think it's ready to land.

Flarna · 2020-09-04T07:32:34Z

@nodejs/lts Any chance that this gets included into the next v12 release? According to nodejs/Release#494 12.19.0 should be out soon.

MylesBorins · 2020-09-23T15:23:35Z

looks like V8 CI also failed on this one

richardlau · 2020-09-23T15:37:18Z

looks like V8 CI also failed on this one

Infra blip. V8-CI rerun: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-v8-linux/3396/

richardlau · 2020-09-23T15:40:01Z

looks like V8 CI also failed on this one

Infra blip. V8-CI rerun: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-v8-linux/3396/

Or maybe not, looks like the job has merge issues checking out this PR.

Flarna · 2020-09-23T16:34:05Z

I will do a rebase and retry in couple of minutes

Flarna · 2020-09-23T18:32:11Z

v8 CI still fails because a lot files I haven't even touched require a merge according to git....

MylesBorins · 2020-09-23T18:39:20Z

/cc @nodejs/build any idea what's going on with V8 CI?

richardlau · 2020-09-23T19:08:11Z

/cc @nodejs/build any idea what's going on with V8 CI?

For some reason testing this PR was leaving the workspaces in an umerged state that was preventing the checkouts on subsequent jobs from succeeding. I've wiped out the workspaces and restarted the job.
new V8-CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-v8-linux/3399/

Original commit message: [promisehook] Add before/after hooks to thenable tasks This will allow Node.js to properly track async context in thenables. Change-Id: If441423789a78307a57ad7e645daabf551cddb57 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2215624 Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <[email protected]> Commit-Queue: Gus Caplan <[email protected]> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68207} Refs: v8/v8@eec10a2 PR-URL: nodejs#33778 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>

This adds a test to verify that AsyncLocalStorage works with thenables. PR-URL: nodejs#34008 Refs: nodejs#33778 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>

nodejs-github-bot · 2020-09-23T19:28:14Z

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/33222/
V8 CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-v8-linux/3400/

Flarna · 2020-09-23T20:20:52Z

rebased once more as there was a conflict. CI is green now 🎉

Original commit message: [promisehook] Add before/after hooks to thenable tasks This will allow Node.js to properly track async context in thenables. Change-Id: If441423789a78307a57ad7e645daabf551cddb57 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2215624 Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <[email protected]> Commit-Queue: Gus Caplan <[email protected]> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68207} Refs: v8/v8@eec10a2 Backport-PR-URL: #34776 PR-URL: #33778 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>

This adds a test to verify that AsyncLocalStorage works with thenables. Backport-PR-URL: #34776 PR-URL: #34008 Refs: #33778 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>

addaleax · 2020-09-23T20:47:17Z

Landed in b7e4d5f...232f6e1 :)

nodejs-github-bot added build Issues and PRs related to build files or the CI. v12.x v8 engine Issues and PRs related to the V8 dependency. labels Aug 14, 2020

Qard approved these changes Aug 14, 2020

View reviewed changes

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

Flarna mentioned this pull request Aug 15, 2020

Initialize async member fsevents/fsevents#337

Merged

Flarna added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Aug 15, 2020

Qard mentioned this pull request Aug 23, 2020

What's the status of async_local_storage scope implementation? DataDog/dd-trace-js#1060

Closed

BethGriggs force-pushed the v12.x-staging branch from 729799d to c9bd1a7 Compare September 15, 2020 21:01

Flarna force-pushed the v12-thenables-v8-again branch from ab727f2 to cb58cdb Compare September 15, 2020 22:05

addaleax force-pushed the v12.x-staging branch from be41c83 to efb5192 Compare September 22, 2020 09:25

addaleax added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 22, 2020

github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 22, 2020

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

addaleax force-pushed the v12.x-staging branch 3 times, most recently from 55fe022 to 65b7bf4 Compare September 22, 2020 17:57

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

Flarna force-pushed the v12-thenables-v8-again branch from cb58cdb to 8befd11 Compare September 23, 2020 18:17

Flarna added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 23, 2020

github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 23, 2020

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

Qard and others added 2 commits September 23, 2020 21:21

Flarna force-pushed the v12-thenables-v8-again branch from 8befd11 to 227a637 Compare September 23, 2020 19:22

Flarna added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 23, 2020

github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 23, 2020

addaleax closed this Sep 23, 2020

Flarna deleted the v12-thenables-v8-again branch September 23, 2020 20:58

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[v12.x backport] deps: V8: cherry-pick eec10a2fd8fa and #34008 #34776

[v12.x backport] deps: V8: cherry-pick eec10a2fd8fa and #34008 #34776

Flarna commented Aug 14, 2020 •

edited

Loading

MylesBorins commented Aug 14, 2020

Qard left a comment

Flarna commented Aug 14, 2020

Flarna commented Aug 14, 2020

Flarna commented Aug 14, 2020

This comment has been minimized.

Flarna commented Aug 14, 2020 •

edited

Loading

nodejs-github-bot commented Aug 14, 2020

Qard commented Aug 15, 2020

MylesBorins commented Aug 18, 2020

Qard commented Aug 18, 2020

Flarna commented Aug 18, 2020

Flarna commented Sep 4, 2020

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

MylesBorins commented Sep 23, 2020

richardlau commented Sep 23, 2020

richardlau commented Sep 23, 2020

Flarna commented Sep 23, 2020

This comment has been minimized.

Flarna commented Sep 23, 2020

MylesBorins commented Sep 23, 2020

richardlau commented Sep 23, 2020 •

edited

Loading

This comment has been minimized.

nodejs-github-bot commented Sep 23, 2020 •

edited by Flarna

Loading

Flarna commented Sep 23, 2020

addaleax commented Sep 23, 2020

[v12.x backport] deps: V8: cherry-pick eec10a2fd8fa and #34008 #34776

[v12.x backport] deps: V8: cherry-pick eec10a2fd8fa and #34008 #34776

Conversation

Flarna commented Aug 14, 2020 • edited Loading

MylesBorins commented Aug 14, 2020

Qard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Flarna commented Aug 14, 2020

Flarna commented Aug 14, 2020

Flarna commented Aug 14, 2020

This comment has been minimized.

Flarna commented Aug 14, 2020 • edited Loading

nodejs-github-bot commented Aug 14, 2020

Qard commented Aug 15, 2020

MylesBorins commented Aug 18, 2020

Qard commented Aug 18, 2020

Flarna commented Aug 18, 2020

Flarna commented Sep 4, 2020

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

MylesBorins commented Sep 23, 2020

richardlau commented Sep 23, 2020

richardlau commented Sep 23, 2020

Flarna commented Sep 23, 2020

This comment has been minimized.

Flarna commented Sep 23, 2020

MylesBorins commented Sep 23, 2020

richardlau commented Sep 23, 2020 • edited Loading

This comment has been minimized.

nodejs-github-bot commented Sep 23, 2020 • edited by Flarna Loading

Flarna commented Sep 23, 2020

addaleax commented Sep 23, 2020

Flarna commented Aug 14, 2020 •

edited

Loading

Flarna commented Aug 14, 2020 •

edited

Loading

richardlau commented Sep 23, 2020 •

edited

Loading

nodejs-github-bot commented Sep 23, 2020 •

edited by Flarna

Loading