test: remove time check #4494
Closed
test: remove time check #4494
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
test-child-process-fork-net2.js checks that things happen within certain time constraints, thus doubling as a benchmark test in addition to a functionality test. This change removes the time check, as it was causing the test to fail on SmartOS and Windows (and possibly elsewhere) when the tests were run in parallel on CI. There is no guarantee that other tests won't consume enough resources to slow this test down, so don't check the time constraints (beyond the generous timeout that the test is given by test.py in the first place, of course). If we want to do benchmark/performance tests, we should keep them separate from pure functionality tests. The time check may have been a remnant of the distant past when Node.js was much slower. It predates io.js Ref: nodejs#4476
|
One CI infra failure and one unrelated test failure on Raspberry Pi. CI looks good, I think. |
|
Can you test on top of |
|
@jbergstroem Test is now passing on SmartOS in parallelized CI. A bunch of other unrelated failures still, of course. |
mscdex
added
the
child_process
|
@Trott: Smartos looks pretty messed up (still going?!) in the above build. I think the problem might be that |
|
Heh, the test in this PR is run pretty early on in the suite (71st test) so I saw that it passed and didn't look again. That's...impressive...that it's still running.... |
|
@Trott when you have a moment, can you rebase on |
|
Code change LGTM FWIW |
|
@jbergstroem OK, here it is again: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit/1595/ |
|
LGTM |
Trott
added a commit
to Trott/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2016
test-child-process-fork-net2.js checks that things happen within certain time constraints, thus doubling as a benchmark test in addition to a functionality test. This change removes the time check, as it was causing the test to fail on SmartOS and Windows (and possibly elsewhere) when the tests were run in parallel on CI. There is no guarantee that other tests won't consume enough resources to slow this test down, so don't check the time constraints (beyond the generous timeout that the test is given by test.py in the first place, of course). If we want to do benchmark/performance tests, we should keep them separate from pure functionality tests. The time check may have been a remnant of the distant past when Node.js was much slower. It predates io.js Ref: nodejs#4476 PR-URL: nodejs#4494 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <[email protected]>
|
Landed in 9a6cfce |
Fishrock123
pushed a commit
to Fishrock123/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2016
test-child-process-fork-net2.js checks that things happen within certain time constraints, thus doubling as a benchmark test in addition to a functionality test. This change removes the time check, as it was causing the test to fail on SmartOS and Windows (and possibly elsewhere) when the tests were run in parallel on CI. There is no guarantee that other tests won't consume enough resources to slow this test down, so don't check the time constraints (beyond the generous timeout that the test is given by test.py in the first place, of course). If we want to do benchmark/performance tests, we should keep them separate from pure functionality tests. The time check may have been a remnant of the distant past when Node.js was much slower. It predates io.js Ref: nodejs#4476 PR-URL: nodejs#4494 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2016
test-child-process-fork-net2.js checks that things happen within certain time constraints, thus doubling as a benchmark test in addition to a functionality test. This change removes the time check, as it was causing the test to fail on SmartOS and Windows (and possibly elsewhere) when the tests were run in parallel on CI. There is no guarantee that other tests won't consume enough resources to slow this test down, so don't check the time constraints (beyond the generous timeout that the test is given by test.py in the first place, of course). If we want to do benchmark/performance tests, we should keep them separate from pure functionality tests. The time check may have been a remnant of the distant past when Node.js was much slower. It predates io.js Ref: #4476 PR-URL: #4494 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2016
test-child-process-fork-net2.js checks that things happen within certain time constraints, thus doubling as a benchmark test in addition to a functionality test. This change removes the time check, as it was causing the test to fail on SmartOS and Windows (and possibly elsewhere) when the tests were run in parallel on CI. There is no guarantee that other tests won't consume enough resources to slow this test down, so don't check the time constraints (beyond the generous timeout that the test is given by test.py in the first place, of course). If we want to do benchmark/performance tests, we should keep them separate from pure functionality tests. The time check may have been a remnant of the distant past when Node.js was much slower. It predates io.js Ref: #4476 PR-URL: #4494 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 19, 2016
test-child-process-fork-net2.js checks that things happen within certain time constraints, thus doubling as a benchmark test in addition to a functionality test. This change removes the time check, as it was causing the test to fail on SmartOS and Windows (and possibly elsewhere) when the tests were run in parallel on CI. There is no guarantee that other tests won't consume enough resources to slow this test down, so don't check the time constraints (beyond the generous timeout that the test is given by test.py in the first place, of course). If we want to do benchmark/performance tests, we should keep them separate from pure functionality tests. The time check may have been a remnant of the distant past when Node.js was much slower. It predates io.js Ref: #4476 PR-URL: #4494 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <[email protected]>
Merged
This was referenced Dec 7, 2023
This was referenced Dec 7, 2023
This was referenced Dec 7, 2023
This was referenced Dec 8, 2023
This was referenced Dec 8, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
test-child-process-fork-net2.js checks that things happen within
certain time constraints, thus doubling as a benchmark test in addition
to a functionality test.
This change removes the time check, as it was causing the test to fail
on SmartOS and Windows (and possibly elsewhere) when the tests were
run in parallel on CI. There is no guarantee that other tests won't
consume enough resources to slow this test down, so don't check the time
constraints (beyond the generous timeout that the test is given by
test.py in the first place, of course).
If we want to do benchmark/performance tests, we should keep them
separate from pure functionality tests. The time check may have been a
remnant of the distant past when Node.js was much slower. It predates
io.js
Ref: #4476
R=@jbergstroem ?