-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tools: update ESLint to 8.2.0 #40734
Conversation
Fast-track has been requested by @targos. Please 👍 to approve. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rubber-stamp LGTM
Commit queue failed (https://github.com/nodejs/node/runs/4125859812?check_suite_focus=true) but it only commented on #40720 |
Last lines of the logs:
|
Exit code 22 means that the HTTP response's code was >=400 |
I tried locally, the response code is 404 |
|
PR-URL: #40734 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Voltrex <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Landed in 1977afd |
@aduh95 ^ |
I tried landing #40664 (comment) using the CQ, and it crashed. However, trying the command manually succeeded for me, I wasn't able to reproduce the 404. Maybe it's token that we use is not allowed to merge PRs? |
I think we use the default token provided by GitHub. It's supposed to have read/write access to pull requests: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/automatic-token-authentication#permissions-for-the-github_token |
We don't, we set a special one from the repo secrets: node/.github/workflows/commit-queue.yml Lines 29 to 33 in f367af4
|
That's not the one we pass to commit-queue.sh: node/.github/workflows/commit-queue.yml Line 81 in f367af4
|
According to the
Anyway it's very surprising the CQ was working on node-auto-test but doesn't on nodejs/node. Maybe it's related to one of the branch protection rules? None are setup on |
Mmmh, that's possible. We do have a rule that only allows members of |
That's probably when the |
Oh I see, the |
PR-URL: #40734 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Voltrex <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #40734 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Voltrex <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Update ESLint to 8.2.0