-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
stream: remove isPromise utility function #35925
Conversation
Review requested:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure this is an improvement? The behavior is the same?
Yes the behavior is the same. Another way would be to change the name of the function |
Actually the current implementation (and the one in this PR) is wrong if someone passes a It's not a big bug but promise test suites check for it. The correct implementation would be to do it in "two steps":
See here for an example |
The function was not checking if the parameter was actually a Promise instance, but if it has a `then` method. Removing the utility function in favor of a clearer `typeof` check, handling the case when the thenable throws if then method is accessed more than once.
35e4d0a
to
f18db47
Compare
I've implemented the solution suggested by @benjamingr, PTAL. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please consider adding a test.
If you prefer not to - I'll add one sometime after this lands :]
Test added! It does fail on master and not with this PR, PTAL. @ronag Have your concerns been addressed? |
@ronag are you still blocking this or can your objection be dismissed? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
Landed in adae822...ad98cf0 |
The function was not checking if the parameter was actually a Promise instance, but if it has a `then` method. Removing the utility function in favor of a clearer `typeof` check, handling the case when the thenable throws if then method is accessed more than once. PR-URL: #35925 Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
The function was not checking if the parameter was actually a Promise instance, but if it has a `then` method. Removing the utility function in favor of a clearer `typeof` check, handling the case when the thenable throws if then method is accessed more than once. PR-URL: #35925 Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
The function was not checking if the parameter was actually a Promise instance, but if it has a `then` method. Removing the utility function in favor of a clearer `typeof` check, handling the case when the thenable throws if then method is accessed more than once. PR-URL: #35925 Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
The function was not checking if the parameter was actually a Promise
instance, but if it has a
then
method. Removing the utility functionin favor of a clearer
typeof
check, handling the case when thethenable throws if then method is accessed more than once.
The difference between a thenable and a
Promise
may be important when using third party library (the parameter is provided by the user) and/or whenPromise.prototype.then
value is changed from userland.Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes