Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: remove dead code #25009

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

This is not used by the test anymore.

I am uncertain why this is not found by eslint but I did not check.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

This is not used by the test anymore.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Dec 13, 2018
This removes two entries from the eslint ignore file. One file does
not exist anymore and the other one could easily be fixed.
@@ -1,9 +1,7 @@
node_modules
lib/internal/v8.js
lib/internal/v8_prof_polyfill.js
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure what this file does. Do we have to ignore the file here?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My vague recollection: I think the file was originally copied from either V8 source or a V8 change proposal that may have been rejected by V8. Since we were copying the file, we didn't apply our lint style to it since we would just copy changes from upstream at a later date, presumably. This is similar, I think, to how we handle punycode.js. It looks like we may now basically own v8_prof_polyfill.js, though. I'm not sure. @matthewloring may know,.

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member Author

@BridgeAR BridgeAR added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Dec 13, 2018
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Dec 15, 2018

Trott pushed a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2018
This is not used by the test anymore.

PR-URL: nodejs#25009
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Trott pushed a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2018
This removes two entries from the eslint ignore file. One file does
not exist anymore and the other one could easily be fixed.

PR-URL: nodejs#25009
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Dec 15, 2018

Landed in e7c3a1b...1395256

@Trott Trott closed this Dec 15, 2018
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2018
This is not used by the test anymore.

PR-URL: #25009
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2018
This removes two entries from the eslint ignore file. One file does
not exist anymore and the other one could easily be fixed.

PR-URL: #25009
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
@BethGriggs BethGriggs mentioned this pull request Dec 18, 2018
refack pushed a commit to refack/node that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2019
This is not used by the test anymore.

PR-URL: nodejs#25009
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
refack pushed a commit to refack/node that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2019
This removes two entries from the eslint ignore file. One file does
not exist anymore and the other one could easily be fixed.

PR-URL: nodejs#25009
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2019
This is not used by the test anymore.

PR-URL: #25009
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2019
This removes two entries from the eslint ignore file. One file does
not exist anymore and the other one could easily be fixed.

PR-URL: #25009
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
@BethGriggs BethGriggs mentioned this pull request Feb 12, 2019
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2019
This is not used by the test anymore.

PR-URL: #25009
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2019
This removes two entries from the eslint ignore file. One file does
not exist anymore and the other one could easily be fixed.

PR-URL: #25009
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2019
This is not used by the test anymore.

PR-URL: #25009
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2019
This removes two entries from the eslint ignore file. One file does
not exist anymore and the other one could easily be fixed.

PR-URL: #25009
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
@BridgeAR BridgeAR deleted the remove-dead-code branch January 20, 2020 11:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants