Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: check that this != new.target in addon #15681

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis commented Sep 29, 2017

Add two checks that are there for expository reasons as much as they are
sanity checks.

Refs: nodejs/node-addon-api#142
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/10333/

Add two checks that are there for expository reasons as much as they are
sanity checks.

Refs: nodejs/node-addon-api#142
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added addons Issues and PRs related to native addons. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. labels Sep 29, 2017
@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

BridgeAR commented Oct 2, 2017

Landed in 9e9c83e

@BridgeAR BridgeAR closed this Oct 2, 2017
BridgeAR pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2017
Add two checks that are there for expository reasons as much as they are
sanity checks.

PR-URL: #15681
Refs: nodejs/node-addon-api#142
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2017
Add two checks that are there for expository reasons as much as they are
sanity checks.

PR-URL: #15681
Refs: nodejs/node-addon-api#142
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2017
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2017
Add two checks that are there for expository reasons as much as they are
sanity checks.

PR-URL: #15681
Refs: nodejs/node-addon-api#142
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
addaleax pushed a commit to addaleax/ayo that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2017
Add two checks that are there for expository reasons as much as they are
sanity checks.

PR-URL: nodejs/node#15681
Refs: nodejs/node-addon-api#142
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2017
Add two checks that are there for expository reasons as much as they are
sanity checks.

PR-URL: #15681
Refs: nodejs/node-addon-api#142
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis deleted the node-addon-api-142 branch October 13, 2017 07:47
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2017
Add two checks that are there for expository reasons as much as they are
sanity checks.

PR-URL: #15681
Refs: nodejs/node-addon-api#142
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Oct 17, 2017
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2017
Add two checks that are there for expository reasons as much as they are
sanity checks.

PR-URL: #15681
Refs: nodejs/node-addon-api#142
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Nov 3, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
addons Issues and PRs related to native addons. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants