Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: skipIfInspectorDisabled cluster-inspect-brk #12757

Closed

Conversation

danbev
Copy link
Contributor

@danbev danbev commented Apr 30, 2017

When configured --without-ssl the inspect-brk option will not be
available and the process will exit with a exit value of 9 "Invalid
Argument/Bad option".

This commit adds a skipIfInspectorDisabled check since --without-ssl
implies that no inspector support is build as well.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

src

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Apr 30, 2017
@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented Apr 30, 2017

@mscdex mscdex added cluster Issues and PRs related to the cluster subsystem. inspector Issues and PRs related to the V8 inspector protocol labels Apr 30, 2017
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
'use strict';
const common = require('../common');
if (!common.hasCrypto) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it can just be common.skipIfInspectorDisabled()

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMHO not having SSL is not a reason to skip this test, that's a regression.
What @targos suggested makes more sense, and should be reflected in title and commit message, i.e. test: skip cluster-inspect-brk if inspector is disabled

@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented Apr 30, 2017 via email

@refack
Copy link
Contributor

refack commented Apr 30, 2017

Is it the same with just --inspect? Isn't that a bigger problem?
IMHO we need to have inspector fallback to HTTP.

Ref: #12758

@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
'use strict';
const common = require('../common');
if (!common.hasCrypto) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMHO not having SSL is not a reason to skip this test, that's a regression.
What @targos suggested makes more sense, and should be reflected in title and commit message, i.e. test: skip cluster-inspect-brk if inspector is disabled

When configured --without-ssl the inspect-brk option will not be
available and the process will exit with a exit value of 9 "Invalid
Argument/Bad option".

This commit adds a skipIfInspectorDisabled check since --without-ssl
implies that no inspector support is build as well.
@danbev danbev force-pushed the add-hasCrypto-check-cluster-inspect-brk branch from 342e8e8 to 2cb2411 Compare April 30, 2017 13:38
@danbev danbev changed the title test: add hasCrypto check to cluster-inspect-brk test: skipIfInspectorDisabled cluster-inspect-brk Apr 30, 2017
@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented Apr 30, 2017

Copy link
Contributor

@refack refack left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks.

danbev added a commit to danbev/node that referenced this pull request May 2, 2017
When configured --without-ssl the inspect-brk option will not be
available and the process will exit with a exit value of 9 "Invalid
Argument/Bad option".

This commit adds a skipIfInspectorDisabled check since --without-ssl
implies that no inspector support is build as well.

PR-URL: nodejs#12757
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented May 2, 2017

Landed in 10ccf56

@danbev danbev closed this May 2, 2017
anchnk pushed a commit to anchnk/node that referenced this pull request May 6, 2017
When configured --without-ssl the inspect-brk option will not be
available and the process will exit with a exit value of 9 "Invalid
Argument/Bad option".

This commit adds a skipIfInspectorDisabled check since --without-ssl
implies that no inspector support is build as well.

PR-URL: nodejs#12757
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@jasnell jasnell mentioned this pull request May 11, 2017
@gibfahn gibfahn mentioned this pull request Jun 15, 2017
3 tasks
@gibfahn
Copy link
Member

gibfahn commented Jun 18, 2017

Should land with #12615

@danbev danbev deleted the add-hasCrypto-check-cluster-inspect-brk branch June 28, 2017 05:26
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2017
When configured --without-ssl the inspect-brk option will not be
available and the process will exit with a exit value of 9 "Invalid
Argument/Bad option".

This commit adds a skipIfInspectorDisabled check since --without-ssl
implies that no inspector support is build as well.

PR-URL: #12757
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Oct 17, 2017
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2017
When configured --without-ssl the inspect-brk option will not be
available and the process will exit with a exit value of 9 "Invalid
Argument/Bad option".

This commit adds a skipIfInspectorDisabled check since --without-ssl
implies that no inspector support is build as well.

PR-URL: #12757
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Nov 3, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cluster Issues and PRs related to the cluster subsystem. inspector Issues and PRs related to the V8 inspector protocol test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants