Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

src: use std::list for at_exit_functions #12255

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

danbev
Copy link
Contributor

@danbev danbev commented Apr 6, 2017

This change was suggested by bnoordhuis in the following comment:
#9163 (comment)

Not including any tests as this is covered by test/addons/at-exit.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

src

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. label Apr 6, 2017
@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented Apr 6, 2017

@mscdex mscdex added the process Issues and PRs related to the process subsystem. label Apr 6, 2017
src/node.cc Outdated
void (*cb_)(void* arg);
void* arg_;
};

static AtExitCallback* at_exit_functions_;
static std::list<AtExitCallback*> at_exit_functions_;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use AtExitCallback not a pointer-to-AtExitCallback. It's leaking memory now in RunAtExit().

(Tiny nit: it should really be called at_exit_functions, it's not a class member.)

src/node.cc Outdated
p->cb_(p->arg_);
delete p;
p = q;
for (AtExitCallback* atExit : at_exit_functions_) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Style: at_exit

src/node.cc Outdated
p->cb_ = cb;
p->arg_ = arg;
at_exit_functions_.push_back(p);
AtExitCallback p = {cb, arg};
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, maybe call this at_exit for consistency.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah good point, will change that. Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is using an anonymous object something considered ok to do?

at_exit_functions.push_back(AtExitCallback{cb, arg});

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, that's fine.

@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented Apr 6, 2017

This change was suggested by bnoordhuis in the following comment:
nodejs#9163 (comment)

Not including any tests as this is covered by test/addons/at-exit.
@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented Apr 9, 2017

danbev added a commit to danbev/node that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2017
This change was suggested by bnoordhuis in the following comment:
nodejs#9163 (comment)

Not including any tests as this is covered by test/addons/at-exit.

PR-URL: nodejs#12255
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented Apr 10, 2017

Landed in fe016c6

@danbev danbev closed this Apr 10, 2017
italoacasas pushed a commit to italoacasas/node that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2017
This change was suggested by bnoordhuis in the following comment:
nodejs#9163 (comment)

Not including any tests as this is covered by test/addons/at-exit.

PR-URL: nodejs#12255
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
@italoacasas italoacasas mentioned this pull request Apr 10, 2017
2 tasks
@danbev danbev deleted the atexit-list branch April 13, 2017 11:31
@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

Should this be cherry-picked to v6.x? It lands cleanly fwiw

@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented Apr 19, 2017

@MylesBorins Not sure as it is a minor improvement, but if it lands cleanly I see no harm in that. Let me know if you'd like me to create a PR against v6.x-staging. Thanks

MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2017
This change was suggested by bnoordhuis in the following comment:
#9163 (comment)

Not including any tests as this is covered by test/addons/at-exit.

PR-URL: #12255
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request May 23, 2017
andrew749 pushed a commit to michielbaird/node that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2017
This change was suggested by bnoordhuis in the following comment:
nodejs/node#9163 (comment)

Not including any tests as this is covered by test/addons/at-exit.

PR-URL: nodejs/node#12255
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. process Issues and PRs related to the process subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants