-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
linkedlist: remove unused methods #11726
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, as long as CI is happy.
I think the entire module should be removed, as you say, its been runtime deprecated since 5.x, 8.x is a good time to remove it. |
@ChALkeR ... can you check to see if there is any ecosystem usage of |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM if the ecosystem is not using it. I'd also be +1 to removing it completely if it's not being used.
@ChALkeR Any news? CITGM FWIW: https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker/666/ |
lgtm |
If there are no significant uses in userland still, I'm ok with removing
the module. Otherwise, this pr as is is fine.
…On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 9:29 PM Brian White ***@***.***> wrote:
To those who approved this.... is that an approval of this PR as-is or
approval of just removing the module entirely? @indutny
<https://github.com/indutny> @cjihrig <https://github.com/cjihrig>
@jasnell <https://github.com/jasnell> @rvagg <https://github.com/rvagg>
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#11726 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAa2eaZRaJhvK_GJW7-yKnd_bkJnccSdks5roKOTgaJpZM4MVKpo>
.
|
What @jasnell said. |
I've decided to do the |
PR-URL: #11726 Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <[email protected]>
Landed in b40dab5 |
Sorry, it looks like I forgot this one. It's completely ok to change, the public version of the module have been runtime-deprecated in #3078 and removed in #12113. The (old) usage data is at #3078 (comment) and was about 17 packages. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Late LGTM :-)
This should probably only land once lib/_linklist.js is removed to avoid any breakage. Since that private module has been (runtime) deprecated since v5.0.0, should it finally be removed in v8.0.0? If not, I can mark this as 'in progress' or similar until it is removed. Thoughts @nodejs/ctc?
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/6736/
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)