Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: fix timing sensitivity in debugger test #11008

Closed

Conversation

ofrobots
Copy link
Contributor

test-debugger-util-regression.js was sensitive to timing, which seems to have changed enough with V8 5.7 to cause this test to fail. Fix the test to ensure we take debugger steps only at stable states instead of erroneously taking a step on a partially complete buffer.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added test Issues and PRs related to the tests. lts-watch-v6.x labels Jan 26, 2017
Copy link
Member

@addaleax addaleax left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM if CI is happy

@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ const path = require('path');
const spawn = require('child_process').spawn;
const assert = require('assert');

const DELAY = 200; //ms.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it worth wrapping this in common.platformTimeout?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep. Good idea.

@@ -21,12 +23,16 @@ proc.stderr.setEncoding('utf8');

let stdout = '';
let stderr = '';
proc.stdout.on('data', (data) => stdout += data);
proc.stderr.on('data', (data) => stderr += data);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think proc.stdout.setEncoding('utf-8') would be good practice here (and the same for proc.stderr)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's already there, a few lines above, unchanged by my patch.

test-debugger-util-regression.js was sensitive to timing, which seems
to have changed enough with V8 5.7 to cause this test to fail. Fix the
test to ensure we take debugger steps only at stable states instead of
erroneously taking a step on a partially complete buffer.

PR-URL: nodejs#11008
Reviewed-By: addaleax - Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2017
test-debugger-util-regression.js was sensitive to timing, which seems
to have changed enough with V8 5.7 to cause this test to fail. Fix the
test to ensure we take debugger steps only at stable states instead of
erroneously taking a step on a partially complete buffer.

PR-URL: #11008
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Feb 2, 2017

Landed in 21b05cd

@jasnell jasnell closed this Feb 2, 2017
italoacasas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2017
test-debugger-util-regression.js was sensitive to timing, which seems
to have changed enough with V8 5.7 to cause this test to fail. Fix the
test to ensure we take debugger steps only at stable states instead of
erroneously taking a step on a partially complete buffer.

PR-URL: #11008
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
italoacasas pushed a commit to italoacasas/node that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2017
test-debugger-util-regression.js was sensitive to timing, which seems
to have changed enough with V8 5.7 to cause this test to fail. Fix the
test to ensure we take debugger steps only at stable states instead of
erroneously taking a step on a partially complete buffer.

PR-URL: nodejs#11008
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
krydos pushed a commit to krydos/node that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2017
test-debugger-util-regression.js was sensitive to timing, which seems
to have changed enough with V8 5.7 to cause this test to fail. Fix the
test to ensure we take debugger steps only at stable states instead of
erroneously taking a step on a partially complete buffer.

PR-URL: nodejs#11008
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2017
test-debugger-util-regression.js was sensitive to timing, which seems
to have changed enough with V8 5.7 to cause this test to fail. Fix the
test to ensure we take debugger steps only at stable states instead of
erroneously taking a step on a partially complete buffer.

PR-URL: #11008
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2017
test-debugger-util-regression.js was sensitive to timing, which seems
to have changed enough with V8 5.7 to cause this test to fail. Fix the
test to ensure we take debugger steps only at stable states instead of
erroneously taking a step on a partially complete buffer.

PR-URL: #11008
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Mar 9, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants