chore(docs): replace va by posthog #4123
Conversation
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve the removal of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (24)
apps/docs/.env.example (1)
21-23: Consider enhancing documentation for PostHog configurationWhile the variables match the PR requirements, consider:
- Adding comments explaining where to obtain these values
- Including a link to PostHog documentation
- Adding migration instructions for users switching from the previous analytics solution
# PostHog -NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY=your-posthog-key -NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST=your-posthog-host +# Get these values from your PostHog project settings (https://posthog.com) +NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY=your-project-api-key # Required for analytics +NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST=your-instance-host # e.g., https://app.posthog.comapps/docs/components/figma-button.tsx (2)
6-7: Consider adding TypeScript type definitionThe component structure is good, but adding a type definition would improve maintainability.
-export const FigmaButton = () => { +export const FigmaButton: React.FC = () => {
10-26: Add error handling for event trackingThe button implementation and event tracking look good, but consider adding error handling for the PostHog capture call.
onPress={() => { - posthog.capture("FigmaPage - Open Figma Link", { - action: "click", - category: "figma", - }); + try { + posthog.capture("FigmaPage - Open Figma Link", { + action: "click", + category: "figma", + }); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to track Figma button click:", error); + } }}apps/docs/components/featurebase/fb-feedback-button.tsx (1)
Line range hint
31-35: Consider standardizing event naming and propertiesWhile the event tracking implementation is functional, consider standardizing the event name and properties structure:
- The event name contains both "Featurebase" and "featurebase" in different cases
- The redundant "name" property matches the category
- posthog.capture("Featurebase - Feedback", { - name: "featurebase-feedback", - action: "press", - category: "featurebase", - }); + posthog.capture("featurebase.feedback.click", { + action: "press", + category: "featurebase", + });apps/docs/components/featurebase/fb-changelog-button.tsx (1)
12-12: Consider adding PostHog initialization check.It would be good to verify that PostHog is properly initialized before using it to prevent potential runtime errors.
- const posthog = usePostHog(); + const posthog = usePostHog(); + + if (!posthog) { + console.warn('PostHog is not initialized'); + return null; + }apps/docs/next.config.js (1)
28-29: Consider making PostHog region configurable.The PostHog endpoints are currently hardcoded to the US region (
us.i.posthog.com). Consider making this configurable through environment variables to support users in other regions or self-hosted instances.Example implementation:
+ // Read region from env var, default to 'us' + const POSTHOG_REGION = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_REGION || 'us'; rewrites: async () => { return [ { - destination: "https://us-assets.i.posthog.com/static/:path*", + destination: `https://${POSTHOG_REGION}-assets.i.posthog.com/static/:path*`, source: "/ingest/static/:path*", }, { - destination: "https://us.i.posthog.com/:path*", + destination: `https://${POSTHOG_REGION}.i.posthog.com/:path*`, source: "/ingest/:path*", }, { - destination: "https://us.i.posthog.com/decide", + destination: `https://${POSTHOG_REGION}.i.posthog.com/decide`, source: "/ingest/decide", }, ]; },Also applies to: 32-33, 36-37
apps/docs/components/demos/custom-button.tsx (1)
32-35: Consider enhancing analytics with additional context.While the basic event tracking is maintained, consider adding more contextual data that could be valuable for analytics:
- Button location/placement
- User interaction details (e.g., device type, viewport size)
posthog.capture("LandingPage - Confetti Button", { action: "press", category: "landing-page", + viewport: { + width: document.documentElement.clientWidth, + height: document.documentElement.clientHeight + }, + buttonPosition: { + x: targetCenterX, + y: targetY + } });apps/docs/components/theme-switch.tsx (1)
Line range hint
26-30: Consider standardizing the event naming convention and structure.While the PostHog implementation is correct, consider these improvements for consistency:
- Use snake_case for event names (e.g.,
theme_changeinstead ofThemeChange)- Add component context to the event data
- posthog.capture("ThemeChange", { + posthog.capture("theme_change", { action: "click", category: "theme", + component: "theme_switch", data: theme === "light" ? "dark" : "light", });apps/docs/components/blog-post.tsx (3)
Line range hint
19-24: Consider adding error handling for PostHog initializationWhile the event tracking implementation is correct, it would be beneficial to add error handling for cases where PostHog might not be properly initialized, especially considering the required environment variables.
const handlePress = () => { + if (!posthog) { + console.warn('PostHog not initialized'); + return; + } posthog.capture("BlogPostCard - Selection", { name: post.title, action: "click", category: "blog", data: post.url ?? "", }); };
Line range hint
40-47: Prevent duplicate event trackingThe
handlePressfunction is called both when clicking the card and when clicking the link inside the card. This could lead to duplicate analytics events being recorded for a single user interaction.Consider removing the
onPresshandler from the inner Link component:<Link as={NextLink} className="font-semibold " href={post.url} size="lg" underline="hover" - onPress={handlePress} >
PostHog configuration needs documentation
The PostHog initialization is properly implemented in
apps/docs/app/providers.tsxwith required environment variables (NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEYandNEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST), but these variables are not documented in any.env.examplefiles or README.
- Add documentation for required PostHog environment variables:
NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEYNEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST- Consider adding these variables to
.env.examplefor better developer experience🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-1: Verify PostHog environment configurationSince this component depends on PostHog configuration, let's verify that the required environment variables are properly documented.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if environment variables are documented echo "Checking .env.example files for PostHog configuration..." fd -t f ".env.example" -x grep -l "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG" # Check if PostHog initialization is properly handled echo "Checking PostHog initialization..." rg -l "PostHogProvider|posthog.init"Length of output: 322
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the PostHog initialization code in providers.tsx echo "Checking PostHog initialization implementation..." cat apps/docs/app/providers.tsx # Let's also check for any environment variable documentation in README or docs echo -e "\nChecking documentation for PostHog configuration..." rg -i "posthog|analytics" "README.md" || trueLength of output: 1662
apps/docs/components/docs/components/component-links.tsx (1)
Line range hint
29-38: Consider enhancing the PostHog implementation.While the basic implementation works, consider these improvements:
- Use a consistent event naming convention (e.g.,
component_links.clickorcomponent_links_click).- Add error handling for PostHog capture failures.
- Consider creating type definitions for event names and properties.
const handlePress = () => { if (!href) return; - posthog.capture("ComponentLinks - Click", { - category: "docs", - action: "click", - data: href || "", - }); + try { + posthog.capture("component_links.click", { + category: "docs", + action: "click", + target_url: href || "", + }); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to capture analytics event:", error); + } };apps/docs/components/marketing/hero/hero.tsx (1)
Line range hint
73-77: Consider refactoring duplicate event tracking logicThe event tracking implementation is repeated with similar structure across multiple UI components. Consider extracting this into a helper function to improve maintainability and ensure consistency.
+ const trackHeroEvent = (name: string, action: string, data: string) => { + posthog.capture(name, { + name, + action, + category: "landing-page", + data, + }); + }; // Usage example: - posthog.capture("Hero - Get Started", { - name: "Get Started", - action: "click", - category: "landing-page", - data: "/docs/guide/introduction", - }); + trackHeroEvent("Hero - Get Started", "click", "/docs/guide/introduction");Also applies to: 89-94, 110-115
apps/docs/package.json (1)
72-72: Document breaking changes in analytics integrationThe switch from Vercel Analytics to PostHog represents a significant change in analytics integration. This change requires new environment variables (
NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEYandNEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST) and might affect users who have integrated with Vercel Analytics.Consider:
- Adding a migration guide in the documentation
- Documenting the required environment variables in the README
- Providing examples of how to migrate existing analytics implementations
apps/docs/components/marketing/install-banner.tsx (1)
Line range hint
76-80: Consider creating a centralized analytics serviceTo improve maintainability and ensure consistency across the application, consider extracting the analytics logic into a dedicated service.
Example structure:
// services/analytics.ts export const Analytics = { trackButtonClick: (name: string, data: any) => { posthog.capture(`InstallBanner - ${name}`, { action: "press", category: "landing-page", data }); } };This would make analytics calls more maintainable and consistent across components.
Also applies to: 95-99
apps/docs/components/pro-banner.tsx (2)
17-20: Add error handling for PostHog trackingWhile the event tracking implementation is correct, consider adding error handling to gracefully handle cases where PostHog might not be initialized (e.g., when the environment variables are not set).
const handleClick = () => { - posthog.capture("NextUI Pro Banner", { - action: "click", - category: "landing-page", - }); + try { + posthog?.capture("NextUI Pro Banner", { + action: "click", + category: "landing-page", + }); + } catch (error) { + console.debug("PostHog tracking failed:", error); + } };
Environment variables for PostHog are not documented
Based on the codebase analysis, while PostHog is actively used throughout the application with
NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEYandNEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOSTenvironment variables, these variables are not documented in any.env.examplefiles or README files. This could cause setup issues for other developers.
- Add documentation for required PostHog environment variables:
NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEYNEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-1: Verify environment variables documentationThe PR requires specific PostHog environment variables. Let's verify they are properly documented.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if environment variables are documented in relevant files echo "Checking for environment variables documentation..." rg -l "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY|NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST" --type md rg -l "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY|NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST" .env.exampleLength of output: 253
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for any environment variable documentation in README files and configuration files echo "Checking documentation in README files..." fd README.md --exec cat {} echo -e "\nChecking .env files..." fd -e env -e env.example --exec cat {} echo -e "\nChecking for PostHog related code..." rg "posthog" -i -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 101955
apps/docs/components/mdx-components.tsx (2)
126-126: Add error handling for PostHog event captureWhile the PostHog integration looks good, consider adding error handling to ensure tracking failures don't affect the user experience.
onCopy={() => { - posthog.capture("MDXComponents - Copy", { - category: "docs", - action: "copyCode", - }); + try { + posthog.capture("MDXComponents - Copy", { + category: "docs", + action: "copyCode", + }); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to track copy event:", error); + } }}Also applies to: 150-153
Line range hint
165-170: Add error handling for PostHog event captureAdd error handling to ensure tracking failures don't affect link navigation.
const handlePress = () => { + try { posthog.capture("MDXComponents - Click", { category: "docs", action: "click", data: href || "", }); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to track click event:", error); + } };apps/docs/components/docs/sidebar.tsx (1)
Line range hint
113-117: Add error handling for PostHog trackingThe PostHog event capture should include error handling in case PostHog is not properly initialized.
- posthog.capture("SidebarDocs", { - category: "docs", - action: "click", - data: paths.pathname || "", - }); + try { + if (posthog) { + posthog.capture("SidebarDocs", { + category: "docs", + action: "click", + data: paths.pathname || "", + }); + } + } catch (error) { + console.warn("Failed to track event:", error); + }apps/docs/components/navbar.tsx (1)
Line range hint
76-80: Consider enriching search analytics dataThe search event tracking looks good, but consider adding more context to help with analytics:
- Search result count
- Search query length
- Whether results were found
Example enhancement:
posthog.capture("Navbar - Search", { name: "navbar - search", action: "press", category: "cmdk", + searchContext: { + hasResults: boolean, + resultCount: number, + queryLength: number + } });apps/docs/components/cmdk.tsx (3)
Line range hint
201-206: Consider structuring event properties consistentlyWhile the event tracking works, consider standardizing the event property structure:
posthog.capture("Cmdk - Search", { - name: "cmdk - search", - action: "search", - category: "cmdk", - data: {query, words, matches: matches?.map((match) => match.url).join(", ")}, + name: "Cmdk - Search", + properties: { + action: "search", + category: "cmdk", + query, + words, + matches: matches?.map((match) => match.url).join(", ") + } });
Line range hint
224-229: Apply consistent event naming patternThe event structure should follow the same pattern as other events:
posthog.capture("Cmdk - Open/Close", { - name: "cmdk - open/close", - action: "keydown", - category: "cmdk", - data: isOpen ? "close" : "open", + name: "Cmdk - Open/Close", + properties: { + action: "keydown", + category: "cmdk", + state: isOpen ? "close" : "open" + } });
Line range hint
246-251: Align event property structureMaintain consistency in event property structure:
posthog.capture("Cmdk - ItemSelect", { - name: item.content, - action: "click", - category: "cmdk", - data: item.url, + name: "Cmdk - ItemSelect", + properties: { + action: "click", + category: "cmdk", + content: item.content, + url: item.url + } });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (26)
apps/docs/.env.example(1 hunks)apps/docs/app/providers.tsx(2 hunks)apps/docs/components/blog-post.tsx(1 hunks)apps/docs/components/cmdk.tsx(5 hunks)apps/docs/components/demos/custom-button.tsx(2 hunks)apps/docs/components/docs/components/component-links.tsx(2 hunks)apps/docs/components/docs/pager.tsx(2 hunks)apps/docs/components/docs/sidebar.tsx(3 hunks)apps/docs/components/featurebase/fb-changelog-button.tsx(2 hunks)apps/docs/components/featurebase/fb-feedback-button.tsx(2 hunks)apps/docs/components/featurebase/fb-roadmap-link.tsx(1 hunks)apps/docs/components/figma-button.tsx(1 hunks)apps/docs/components/marketing/features-grid.tsx(2 hunks)apps/docs/components/marketing/hero/hero.tsx(4 hunks)apps/docs/components/marketing/install-banner.tsx(4 hunks)apps/docs/components/marketing/sponsor-item.tsx(2 hunks)apps/docs/components/marketing/support.tsx(2 hunks)apps/docs/components/mdx-components.tsx(4 hunks)apps/docs/components/navbar.tsx(4 hunks)apps/docs/components/pro-banner.tsx(1 hunks)apps/docs/components/scripts/script-providers.tsx(0 hunks)apps/docs/components/theme-switch.tsx(2 hunks)apps/docs/next.config.js(1 hunks)apps/docs/package.json(1 hunks)apps/docs/utils/env.ts(0 hunks)apps/docs/utils/va.ts(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- apps/docs/components/scripts/script-providers.tsx
- apps/docs/utils/env.ts
- apps/docs/utils/va.ts
🔇 Additional comments (47)
apps/docs/components/marketing/sponsor-item.tsx (3)
4-4: LGTM: PostHog import is correctly implemented
The import statement is properly placed and uses the correct package path for PostHog React integration.
13-13: LGTM: PostHog hook is properly initialized
The usePostHog hook is correctly initialized at the component level, following React hooks best practices.
Line range hint 21-25: Verify analytics event name consistency
The event tracking implementation looks correct, but let's ensure the event name "Hero - Sponsors" matches your analytics schema and existing event naming conventions.
✅ Verification successful
Event name follows existing naming pattern
The event name "Hero - Sponsors" follows the established naming pattern in the codebase:
- It uses the "Hero" prefix consistent with other hero section events like "Hero - Get Started", "Hero - Github"
- The event includes standard parameters (name, action, category) matching other events
- The naming style (capitalization, hyphenation) aligns with other events in the marketing components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other PostHog event names to verify naming consistency
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}' 'posthog\.capture\(' -A 2
Length of output: 6348
apps/docs/.env.example (1)
19-20: LGTM!
The added newline improves readability by separating different configuration sections.
apps/docs/components/figma-button.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM: PostHog import is correctly implemented
The import of usePostHog hook is properly placed and aligns with the client-side nature of the component.
4-4: Verify PostHog environment configuration
Let's ensure the required PostHog environment variables are properly documented.
✅ Verification successful
PostHog environment variables are properly documented ✅
The required PostHog environment variables NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY and NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST are correctly documented in apps/docs/.env.example.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if PostHog environment variables are documented in .env.example
rg "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_(KEY|HOST)" -g "*.env*"
Length of output: 179
apps/docs/components/featurebase/fb-feedback-button.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM: PostHog import is correctly configured
The import statement is properly using the React-specific package from PostHog.
12-13: Verify PostHog environment configuration
The PostHog hook is correctly initialized, but ensure the required environment variables are properly set.
✅ Verification successful
PostHog is properly configured and initialized
The verification shows that PostHog is correctly set up:
- Environment variables
NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEYandNEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOSTare properly defined in.env.example - PostHog is correctly initialized with
PostHogProviderinapps/docs/app/providers.tsx - The
usePostHoghook is consistently used across multiple components following React hooks best practices
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify PostHog environment variables are properly configured
# Check if the required environment variables are defined in .env.example
echo "Checking .env.example for PostHog configuration..."
rg "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_(KEY|HOST)" apps/docs/.env.example
# Check for PostHog initialization in providers
echo "Checking PostHog initialization in providers..."
rg "PostHogProvider|usePostHog" apps/docs/
Length of output: 3775
apps/docs/components/featurebase/fb-roadmap-link.tsx (3)
4-4: LGTM: PostHog import is correctly configured
The PostHog React hook import is properly placed and the component is correctly marked as client-side.
15-15: LGTM: PostHog hook is properly initialized
The PostHog hook is correctly initialized at the component level, following React hooks best practices.
Line range hint 18-22: Verify analytics event naming and structure consistency
While the PostHog event capture is implemented correctly, let's ensure consistency with other analytics events in the codebase.
apps/docs/components/featurebase/fb-changelog-button.tsx (1)
4-4: LGTM! Analytics transition looks good.
The PostHog integration is properly implemented with correct event structure and naming convention.
Also applies to: 12-12, 35-39
apps/docs/next.config.js (1)
25-40: LGTM! The rewrite rules are correctly implemented for PostHog integration.
The implementation properly handles all necessary PostHog endpoints including static assets, API calls, and the decide endpoint. The proxy setup through Next.js rewrites helps avoid CORS issues.
apps/docs/components/demos/custom-button.tsx (2)
5-5: LGTM! Clean PostHog integration.
The PostHog hook is properly imported and initialized at the component level.
Also applies to: 9-9
Line range hint 1-48: Verify PostHog environment setup.
Since this component depends on PostHog being properly initialized, ensure that the required environment variables are set up as mentioned in the PR description.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the PostHog initialization further by checking how the client is set up.
PostHog is properly configured and initialized
The verification shows that PostHog is correctly set up:
- Environment variables are documented in
apps/docs/.env.example - PostHog client is properly initialized in
apps/docs/app/providers.tsxwith:- Required environment variables (
NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY,NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST) - Production-only initialization
- Proper provider wrapping with
PostHogProvider
- Required environment variables (
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the required PostHog environment variables are documented
rg "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_(KEY|HOST)" -g "*.md" -g "*.env*"
# Verify PostHog initialization in the app
rg "PostHogProvider|usePostHog" -g "providers.tsx" -g "*.config.*"
Length of output: 439
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check PostHog client initialization
rg -A 10 "posthog" apps/docs/app/providers.tsx
Length of output: 906
apps/docs/app/providers.tsx (2)
3-14: LGTM! Import statements are well-organized
The new imports for PostHog and React types are correctly structured and necessary for the implementation.
43-47: LGTM! Provider hierarchy is well-structured
The ProviderWrapper is correctly positioned to ensure analytics are available throughout the application while maintaining the existing provider structure.
apps/docs/components/docs/pager.tsx (3)
5-5: LGTM: PostHog import correctly added
The PostHog React hook import is properly placed and correctly sourced from the official package.
23-24: LGTM: PostHog hook properly initialized
The PostHog hook is correctly initialized at the component level, following React hooks best practices.
Line range hint 26-30: Consider adopting PostHog-specific event conventions
While the current implementation works, consider adopting PostHog's recommended event naming and property conventions for better analytics organization:
- posthog.capture("DocsPager - Click", {
- category: "docs",
- action: "click",
- data: path || "",
+ posthog.capture("documentation_navigation", {
+ source: "docs_pager",
+ action_type: "click",
+ target_path: path || "",
+ direction: nextRoute ? "next" : "previous"
});Let's verify if there are any remaining instances of the old tracking system:
apps/docs/components/theme-switch.tsx (1)
9-9: LGTM! PostHog integration looks good.
The migration from VA to PostHog has been implemented correctly:
- Proper hook import and initialization
- Event tracking maintains the necessary analytics data
- Implementation follows React best practices
Also applies to: 21-21, 26-30
apps/docs/components/blog-post.tsx (2)
9-9: LGTM: PostHog React integration import
The import statement correctly uses the official PostHog React integration package.
16-16: LGTM: Proper PostHog hook initialization
The PostHog hook is correctly initialized at the component level, following React hooks best practices.
apps/docs/components/marketing/features-grid.tsx (4)
4-4: LGTM: PostHog import added correctly
The PostHog React hook import is properly placed and correctly sourced from 'posthog-js/react'.
39-40: LGTM: PostHog hook initialized correctly
The PostHog hook is properly initialized at the component level, following React hooks best practices.
Line range hint 44-49: Verify PostHog event structure alignment
While the event tracking implementation looks functional, let's ensure it follows PostHog's recommended event structure and naming conventions.
39-40: Verify PostHog environment configuration
The PR mentions required environment variables (NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY and NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST). Let's ensure proper error handling if these are not configured.
✅ Verification successful
Environment variables are properly handled
The PostHog configuration is properly managed in the application:
- PostHog is only initialized in production (
__PROD__) - Environment variables are handled in
providers.tsxduring initialization - The
usePostHoghook infeatures-grid.tsxis only used for analytics tracking and will gracefully handle cases where PostHog is not initialized
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for PostHog initialization code that might handle missing environment variables
rg -A 5 "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG" --type ts --type tsx
# Look for any error handling related to PostHog initialization
ast-grep --pattern 'usePostHog()' -l ts,tsx
Length of output: 237
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for PostHog initialization code and environment variables
rg -t typescript -t tsx "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG"
# Look for PostHog initialization and error handling
rg -t typescript -t tsx "usePostHog"
# Find the provider setup
rg -t typescript -t tsx "PostHogProvider"
Length of output: 229
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for PostHog related code using just file extensions
rg "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG" "*.ts" "*.tsx"
# Look for PostHog initialization
rg "usePostHog" "*.ts" "*.tsx"
# Find PostHog provider configuration
rg "PostHogProvider" "*.ts" "*.tsx"
# Alternative search using fd and grep
fd -e ts -e tsx | xargs grep -l "PostHog"
Length of output: 1275
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the providers.tsx file for PostHog configuration
cat apps/docs/app/providers.tsx
# Check the specific file under review
cat apps/docs/components/marketing/features-grid.tsx
Length of output: 4116
apps/docs/components/docs/components/component-links.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM! Import changes align with PostHog integration.
The addition of usePostHog hook import is the correct approach for integrating PostHog analytics in React components.
4-4: Verify PostHog environment variables documentation.
Since PostHog requires specific environment variables, let's verify their documentation.
apps/docs/components/marketing/hero/hero.tsx (2)
Line range hint 21-27: Well-structured analytics event
The event tracking implementation follows a consistent pattern with all necessary attributes (name, action, category, data).
7-7: Verify PostHog environment configuration
The PostHog setup looks correct, but ensure the required environment variables are properly configured.
Also applies to: 19-20
✅ Verification successful
PostHog configuration is properly set up
The PostHog setup is correctly implemented:
- Environment variables
NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEYandNEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOSTare defined in.env.example - PostHog is properly initialized in
apps/docs/app/providers.tsxwith the required configuration - The provider is correctly wrapped around the application only in production mode
- The
usePostHoghook import in the Hero component will work as expected
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if PostHog environment variables are defined in .env files
rg -l "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_(KEY|HOST)" .env*
# Verify PostHog initialization in providers
rg -A 5 "PostHogProvider" apps/docs/
Length of output: 689
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check PostHog initialization and configuration
rg -A 10 "posthog\." apps/docs/app/providers.tsx
# Check if environment variables are properly used in the code
rg "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG" apps/docs/
Length of output: 591
apps/docs/package.json (1)
72-72: Verify PostHog version for security vulnerabilities
The specified PostHog version (1.187.1) appears to be older than the current stable release. Let's verify if this version has any known security issues.
✅ Verification successful
PostHog version 1.187.1 is secure but slightly outdated
The specified PostHog version (1.187.1) is just one patch version behind the latest (1.187.2) and is well above the only known vulnerability that affected versions below 1.57.2. While an update to 1.187.2 would be ideal for completeness, the current version is secure and doesn't pose any immediate security concerns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for security advisories and latest versions
echo "Checking latest PostHog version..."
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/posthog-js/latest | jq '.version'
echo "Checking for known vulnerabilities..."
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "posthog-js") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 802
apps/docs/components/marketing/install-banner.tsx (1)
Line range hint 76-80: LGTM: Analytics implementation follows consistent patterns
The PostHog event tracking implementation:
- Uses consistent event naming
- Includes appropriate context data
- Maintains similar structure across different events
Also applies to: 95-99
apps/docs/components/pro-banner.tsx (2)
7-7: LGTM: PostHog import added correctly
The PostHog React hook import is properly configured.
14-15: LGTM: PostHog hook initialized properly
The PostHog hook is correctly initialized at the component level.
apps/docs/components/mdx-components.tsx (2)
6-6: LGTM: PostHog import added correctly
The PostHog React hook import is properly placed and correctly referenced.
163-163:
Review URL tracking for potential security risks
The current implementation tracks the full URL in the data field. This could potentially expose sensitive information if URLs contain query parameters with tokens, keys, or personal data.
Consider sanitizing the URL before tracking:
posthog.capture("MDXComponents - Click", {
category: "docs",
action: "click",
- data: href || "",
+ data: href ? new URL(href, window.location.origin).pathname : "",
});Also applies to: 166-170
✅ Verification successful
URL tracking implementation is consistent with existing patterns
Based on the analysis of PostHog tracking patterns across the codebase, the current implementation follows the established conventions:
- Multiple components track URLs in their
datafield (navbar, blog posts, docs sidebar) - All tracked URLs are public routes or documentation paths
- No sensitive parameters are being tracked in any PostHog events
- The tracked URLs are primarily used for navigation analytics
The current implementation in mdx-components.tsx is safe as it only tracks documentation page URLs, which are public information.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for sensitive patterns in URLs across the codebase
rg -i '(token|key|secret|password|auth)=' --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for sensitive patterns in URLs across the codebase with correct file extensions
rg -i '(token|key|secret|password|auth)=' -t ts -t tsx
# Also check for URL parameters being tracked in PostHog events
rg -B 2 -A 2 'posthog.*capture' -t ts -t tsx
# Look for any URL sanitization or security patterns
rg -i 'sanitize.*url|clean.*url|safe.*url' -t ts -t tsx
# Check for existing PostHog implementation patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'posthog.capture($$$)'
Length of output: 10878
apps/docs/components/marketing/support.tsx (3)
6-6: LGTM: Clean PostHog import addition
The import statement follows the correct pattern for PostHog React integration.
98-98: LGTM: Proper hook initialization
The PostHog hook is correctly initialized at the component level.
106-109: LGTM: Event tracking migration looks good
The PostHog event capture maintains the same tracking context as before.
Let's verify the consistency of PostHog event tracking across other components:
✅ Verification successful
PostHog event tracking implementation is consistent across components
The verification shows that the PostHog event tracking implementation follows a consistent pattern across all components:
- All components properly initialize PostHog using
const posthog = usePostHog() - Event captures consistently include
actionand eithercategoryornameproperties - The event naming follows a clear pattern:
{ComponentName} - {Action} - The event structure in the reviewed code matches the pattern used throughout the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent PostHog event tracking implementation
# Expected: All components should use similar event structure
# Check for PostHog event capture patterns
rg -A 2 'posthog\.capture\('
# Verify PostHog initialization across components
ast-grep --pattern 'const posthog = usePostHog()'
Length of output: 7944
apps/docs/components/docs/sidebar.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM: PostHog import is correctly placed
The PostHog React hook import is properly added.
69-69: Verify PostHog configuration
Please ensure that the required environment variables are properly set:
- NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY
- NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST
apps/docs/components/navbar.tsx (2)
Line range hint 131-136: LGTM: Navigation tracking implementation
The navigation event tracking is well-structured with appropriate properties:
- Event name is clear
- Action and category are consistent
- URL data is included
Line range hint 1-365: Verify complete removal of old analytics
Let's ensure all old analytics code has been removed.
✅ Verification successful
No old analytics code found, migration is complete
The search results show that there are no instances of old analytics code (trackEvent or va.) in the codebase. The matches found are either:
- Sample data containing email addresses with "ava"
- UI text mentioning "Analytics" in dropdown menus
- Date picker component code dealing with time/date segments
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining references to the old analytics
rg -i "trackEvent|va\." --type tsx
Length of output: 64
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining references to the old analytics with correct file extensions
rg -i "trackEvent|va\." -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -g "*.js" -g "*.jsx"
# Also check for any other common analytics patterns
rg -i "analytics|segment|mixpanel|gtag|ga\." -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -g "*.js" -g "*.jsx"
Length of output: 24729
apps/docs/components/cmdk.tsx (3)
18-18: LGTM: Clean PostHog integration
The PostHog React hook import is correctly added.
142-142: LGTM: Proper hook initialization
The PostHog hook is correctly initialized at the component level.
Line range hint 201-251: Verify analytics implementation completeness
Let's verify that all previous VA events have been migrated to PostHog.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as there's enough information to verify the analytics implementation.
Analytics migration to PostHog is complete
The codebase shows no remaining VA (Vercel Analytics) tracking calls. All instances of "va." in the search results are false positives (mostly email addresses and documentation references). The PostHog implementation appears comprehensive, with 26 unique tracking events across various user interactions, including all the events in the reviewed code snippet (search, open/close, and item selection in the command menu).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining VA tracking calls and compare with new PostHog implementation
# Search for any remaining VA tracking calls
echo "Checking for remaining VA tracking calls..."
rg "trackEvent|va\."
# List all PostHog event captures for comparison
echo "Listing PostHog event captures..."
rg "posthog\.capture"
Length of output: 4268
wingkwong
force-pushed
the
feat/eng-1582
branch
from
e45526f
to
8c8b70d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
apps/docs/components/icons/sponsors.tsx(0 hunks)apps/docs/components/marketing/sponsors.tsx(1 hunks)apps/docs/utils/get-all-sponsors.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- apps/docs/components/icons/sponsors.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/docs/utils/get-all-sponsors.ts (1)
Line range hint 1-12: Verify PR objectives alignment
The changes in this file appear to be about sponsor management, but the PR objectives mention replacing "va" with "posthog". This seems inconsistent.
Let's verify if there are any related changes:
apps/docs/components/marketing/sponsors.tsx (2)
Line range hint 9-20: LGTM! Sponsor array structure is well-maintained
The sponsors array maintains a consistent structure with proper UTM parameters for tracking.
Line range hint 22-46: LGTM! Component implementation follows best practices
The component properly renders the sponsor list with appropriate key props and includes an accessible "Your Company" button.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (21)
apps/docs/.env.example (1)
21-23: Add more detailed documentation for PostHog variablesWhile the variables match the PR requirements, consider adding more context:
# PostHog -NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY=your-posthog-key -NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST=your-posthog-host +# Required: PostHog project API key from your PostHog instance +NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY=your-posthog-key +# Required: URL of your PostHog instance (e.g., https://app.posthog.com) +NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST=your-posthog-hostapps/docs/components/figma-button.tsx (1)
10-26: Consider adding security attributes for external linkThe button implementation looks good, but since it's an external link, consider adding security-related attributes.
as={Link} className="max-w-fit text-current" color="default" href="https://www.figma.com/community/file/1267584376234254760" + rel="noopener noreferrer" variant="bordered"apps/docs/components/featurebase/fb-feedback-button.tsx (1)
Event naming pattern is inconsistent across the codebase
The event naming pattern shows inconsistency in the codebase:
- Some events use " - " separator (e.g., "Featurebase - Feedback", "Hero - Sponsors")
- Others use no separator (e.g., "ThemeChange", "NavbarItem")
- Mixed capitalization patterns (e.g., "FeaturesGrid - Click" vs "Featurebase - Feedback")
Consider standardizing the event naming convention across the codebase for better analytics consistency and maintainability.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
31-35: Verify consistent event naming patternThe event tracking implementation looks good. Let's verify that the event naming pattern "Featurebase - Feedback" is consistent with other PostHog events in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency in PostHog event naming patterns # Search for other PostHog capture calls echo "Checking PostHog event naming patterns..." rg "posthog\.capture\([\"'].*?[\"']" -g "*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}"Length of output: 2596
apps/docs/components/featurebase/fb-roadmap-link.tsx (1)
Line range hint
18-22: Consider adding more context to the event properties.While the current implementation is functional, consider enriching the event data with additional context like the URL being navigated to.
posthog.capture("Featurebase - Roadmap", { name: "featurebase-roadmap", action: "press", category: "featurebase", + url: process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_FB_FEEDBACK_URL + "/roadmap" });apps/docs/components/featurebase/fb-changelog-button.tsx (1)
Line range hint
35-39: Consider adding error handling and type safetyWhile the PostHog event tracking implementation is functional, consider these improvements:
- Add error handling for cases where PostHog initialization fails
- Define type-safe event names and properties
Consider applying this improvement:
+type TrackingEvent = { + name: string; + action: "press"; + category: "featurebase"; +}; const fbButtonOnClick = () => { (window as any).Featurebase("manually_open_changelog_popup"); - posthog.capture("Featurebase - Changelog", { - name: "featurebase-changelog", - action: "press", - category: "featurebase", - }); + try { + if (posthog) { + const event: TrackingEvent = { + name: "featurebase-changelog", + action: "press", + category: "featurebase", + }; + posthog.capture("Featurebase - Changelog", event); + } + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to track changelog event:", error); + } };apps/docs/next.config.js (1)
25-40: Consider environment validation and configurable endpoints.Since the PR requires specific PostHog environment variables, consider:
- Adding runtime validation for
NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEYandNEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST- Making the PostHog endpoints configurable through environment variables instead of hardcoding US-specific URLs
Here's a suggested implementation:
+ const POSTHOG_HOST = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST || 'us.i.posthog.com'; + const POSTHOG_ASSETS_HOST = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_ASSETS_HOST || 'us-assets.i.posthog.com'; + + // Validate required environment variables + if (!process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY) { + throw new Error('NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY is required'); + } + rewrites: async () => { return [ { - destination: "https://us-assets.i.posthog.com/static/:path*", + destination: `https://${POSTHOG_ASSETS_HOST}/static/:path*`, source: "/ingest/static/:path*", }, { - destination: "https://us.i.posthog.com/:path*", + destination: `https://${POSTHOG_HOST}/:path*`, source: "/ingest/:path*", }, { - destination: "https://us.i.posthog.com/decide", + destination: `https://${POSTHOG_HOST}/decide`, source: "/ingest/decide", }, ]; },apps/docs/components/theme-switch.tsx (1)
Line range hint
26-30: Consider adding type safety for analytics eventsThe event tracking implementation could benefit from type safety to prevent errors and improve maintainability.
Consider creating a type-safe events configuration:
type AnalyticsEvent = { ThemeChange: { action: 'click'; category: 'theme'; data: 'light' | 'dark'; }; // Add other events here }; // Usage posthog.capture<keyof AnalyticsEvent>( 'ThemeChange', { action: 'click', category: 'theme', data: theme === 'light' ? 'dark' : 'light', } );apps/docs/components/blog-post.tsx (1)
Line range hint
19-24: Consider standardizing analytics event naming.The event tracking implementation is correct, but consider using a consistent event naming convention across the application. For example:
- Use a standard prefix for all blog-related events
- Standardize the data structure for analytics events
- posthog.capture("BlogPostCard - Selection", { + posthog.capture("blog.post.click", { name: post.title, action: "click", category: "blog", + component: "BlogPostCard", data: post.url ?? "", });apps/docs/components/marketing/features-grid.tsx (1)
Line range hint
44-49: Add error handling for PostHog event trackingWhile the event tracking implementation is good, consider adding error handling to prevent potential issues if PostHog fails to initialize or the capture call fails.
Consider wrapping the capture call in a try-catch block:
const handleClick = (feat: Feature) => { - posthog.capture("FeaturesGrid - Click", { - name: feat.title, - action: "click", - category: "docs", - data: feat.href ?? "", - }); + try { + posthog.capture("FeaturesGrid - Click", { + name: feat.title, + action: "click", + category: "docs", + data: feat.href ?? "", + }); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to track event:", error); + }apps/docs/components/docs/components/component-links.tsx (1)
Line range hint
29-38: Consider enhancing PostHog event tracking implementationThe PostHog integration is correctly implemented, but could be improved for better maintainability:
- Consider using a more consistent event naming pattern like
component_link_clickedinstead of "ComponentLinks - Click"- Consider creating typed event properties interface for better type safety
Example implementation:
type ComponentLinkEvent = { category: string; action: 'click'; data: string; }; // Usage posthog.capture<ComponentLinkEvent>('component_link_clicked', { category: 'docs', action: 'click', data: href || '', });apps/docs/components/marketing/hero/hero.tsx (2)
Line range hint
22-27: Fix typo in event categoryThe event category contains a typo: "home - gero" should be "home - hero"
posthog.capture("NavbarItem", { name, action: "press", - category: "home - gero", + category: "home - hero", data: url, });
Line range hint
73-78: Consider refactoring duplicate event tracking logicThe event tracking structure is repeated across multiple handlers. Consider extracting this into a reusable function.
+ const trackEvent = (eventName: string, name: string, data: string) => { + posthog.capture(eventName, { + name, + action: "click", + category: "landing-page", + data, + }); + }; // Usage example: - posthog.capture("Hero - Get Started", { - name: "Get Started", - action: "click", - category: "landing-page", - data: "/docs/guide/introduction", - }); + trackEvent("Hero - Get Started", "Get Started", "/docs/guide/introduction");Also applies to: 89-94, 110-115
apps/docs/package.json (1)
Line range hint
1-146: Document required environment variablesSince this package now depends on PostHog, it would be helpful to document the required environment variables in the package.json description or scripts section. Consider adding a setup script that verifies these variables are present:
- NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY
- NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST
"scripts": { "dev": "rimraf .contentlayer && concurrently \"contentlayer dev\" \"next dev\"", "build": "contentlayer build && next build", "build:analyze": "ANALYZE=true next build", "start": "next start", "lint": "next lint", "typecheck": "contentlayer build && tsc --noEmit", "preinstall": "node preinstall.js", + "verify:env": "node -e \"['NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY', 'NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST'].forEach(key => { if (!process.env[key]) throw new Error(`Missing required environment variable: ${key}`) })\"", "build:sponsors": "tsx scripts/build-sponsors.ts", "update:search-meta": "tsx scripts/update-search-meta.ts", - "postbuild": "next-sitemap" + "postbuild": "yarn verify:env && next-sitemap" },apps/docs/components/marketing/install-banner.tsx (1)
Line range hint
76-80: Consider adding type safety for PostHog eventsThe event tracking implementation is consistent, but could benefit from type safety to prevent typos and ensure consistent event naming and properties across the application.
Consider creating a type-safe event tracking utility:
// types/analytics.ts export const EventNames = { INSTALL_BANNER_GET_STARTED: 'InstallBanner - Get Started', INSTALL_BANNER_GITHUB: 'InstallBanner - Github', } as const; type EventProperties = { action: string; category: string; data: string; }; export function trackEvent( posthog: any, name: typeof EventNames[keyof typeof EventNames], properties: EventProperties ) { posthog.capture(name, properties); }Then update the event tracking calls:
-posthog.capture("InstallBanner - Get Started", { +trackEvent(posthog, EventNames.INSTALL_BANNER_GET_STARTED, { action: "press", category: "landing-page", data: "/docs/guide/installation", });Also applies to: 95-99
apps/docs/components/pro-banner.tsx (1)
17-20: Consider adding error handling and type safetyThe PostHog event capture implementation is correct, but could be enhanced with:
- Error handling for cases where PostHog isn't initialized
- TypeScript interfaces for event properties
Consider applying this improvement:
+ type ProBannerEvent = { + action: 'click'; + category: 'landing-page'; + }; + const handleClick = () => { - posthog.capture("NextUI Pro Banner", { - action: "click", - category: "landing-page", - }); + if (posthog) { + posthog.capture<ProBannerEvent>("NextUI Pro Banner", { + action: "click", + category: "landing-page", + }); + } };apps/docs/components/docs/sidebar.tsx (1)
Line range hint
113-117: Consider adding error handling for analytics eventsWhile the PostHog event capture is implemented correctly, consider wrapping it in a try-catch block to handle potential analytics failures gracefully without affecting the main functionality.
- posthog.capture("SidebarDocs", { - category: "docs", - action: "click", - data: paths.pathname || "", - }); + try { + posthog.capture("SidebarDocs", { + category: "docs", + action: "click", + data: paths.pathname || "", + }); + } catch (error) { + // Silently handle analytics errors to prevent disrupting the main functionality + console.debug("Analytics event capture failed:", error); + }apps/docs/components/navbar.tsx (2)
Line range hint
77-81: Standardize analytics event structureThe event structure could be improved for better consistency and analytics:
- posthog.capture("Navbar - Search", { - name: "navbar - search", - action: "press", - category: "cmdk", - }); + posthog.capture("navbar.search", { + action: "press", + category: "navigation", + source: "cmdk", + });This structure:
- Uses dot notation for event names (standard practice)
- Removes redundant "name" property
- Uses more semantic category
Line range hint
132-137: Align NavbarItem event structure with search eventsThe event structure should be consistent across the application:
- posthog.capture("NavbarItem", { - name, - action: "press", - category: "navbar", - data: url, - }); + posthog.capture("navbar.item_click", { + action: "press", + category: "navigation", + item_name: name, + item_url: url, + });This structure:
- Uses consistent event naming pattern
- Uses more descriptive property names
- Aligns with the search event structure
apps/docs/components/cmdk.tsx (3)
Line range hint
201-206: Optimize PostHog event structureThe event tracking implementation could be simplified:
- The
nameandactionfields are redundant with the event name- Consider using a more specific event name like
search_documentation- posthog.capture("Cmdk - Search", { - name: "cmdk - search", - action: "search", + posthog.capture("search_documentation", { category: "cmdk", data: {query, words, matches: matches?.map((match) => match.url).join(", ")}, });
Line range hint
224-229: Maintain consistent event naming conventionFor consistency with the previous event, consider:
- Using a more specific event name
- Removing redundant fields
- posthog.capture("Cmdk - Open/Close", { - name: "cmdk - open/close", - action: "keydown", + posthog.capture("toggle_documentation_search", { category: "cmdk", - data: isOpen ? "close" : "open", + action: isOpen ? "close" : "open", + trigger: "keyboard_shortcut" });
Line range hint
246-251: Standardize PostHog event structureFor a more consistent analytics implementation:
- Use a more specific event name
- Standardize the event payload structure
- posthog.capture("Cmdk - ItemSelect", { - name: item.content, - action: "click", + posthog.capture("select_documentation_item", { category: "cmdk", - data: item.url, + data: { + title: item.content, + url: item.url, + type: item.type + } });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (26)
apps/docs/.env.example(1 hunks)apps/docs/app/providers.tsx(2 hunks)apps/docs/components/blog-post.tsx(1 hunks)apps/docs/components/cmdk.tsx(5 hunks)apps/docs/components/demos/custom-button.tsx(2 hunks)apps/docs/components/docs/components/component-links.tsx(2 hunks)apps/docs/components/docs/pager.tsx(2 hunks)apps/docs/components/docs/sidebar.tsx(3 hunks)apps/docs/components/featurebase/fb-changelog-button.tsx(2 hunks)apps/docs/components/featurebase/fb-feedback-button.tsx(2 hunks)apps/docs/components/featurebase/fb-roadmap-link.tsx(1 hunks)apps/docs/components/figma-button.tsx(1 hunks)apps/docs/components/marketing/features-grid.tsx(2 hunks)apps/docs/components/marketing/hero/hero.tsx(4 hunks)apps/docs/components/marketing/install-banner.tsx(4 hunks)apps/docs/components/marketing/sponsor-item.tsx(2 hunks)apps/docs/components/marketing/support.tsx(2 hunks)apps/docs/components/mdx-components.tsx(4 hunks)apps/docs/components/navbar.tsx(4 hunks)apps/docs/components/pro-banner.tsx(1 hunks)apps/docs/components/scripts/script-providers.tsx(0 hunks)apps/docs/components/theme-switch.tsx(2 hunks)apps/docs/next.config.js(1 hunks)apps/docs/package.json(1 hunks)apps/docs/utils/env.ts(0 hunks)apps/docs/utils/va.ts(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- apps/docs/components/scripts/script-providers.tsx
- apps/docs/utils/env.ts
- apps/docs/utils/va.ts
🔇 Additional comments (42)
apps/docs/components/marketing/sponsor-item.tsx (2)
Line range hint 21-25: Verify event naming convention.
The event tracking implementation is correct, but let's ensure the event name "Hero - Sponsors" follows the established naming convention.
✅ Verification successful
Event naming convention follows a consistent pattern
Based on the search results, the event name "Hero - Sponsors" follows the established naming convention in the codebase. The pattern consistently uses either:
- Section/Component name followed by action: e.g., "Hero - Sponsors", "Hero - Get Started", "InstallBanner - Github"
- Or a single component name for generic events: e.g., "ThemeChange", "NavbarItem"
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent event naming patterns
# Search for other PostHog capture calls to verify naming convention
echo "Checking PostHog event naming patterns..."
rg "posthog\.capture\(['\"].*['\"]" --type ts
Length of output: 2582
4-4: LGTM: PostHog integration looks correct.
The PostHog hook is properly imported and initialized.
Let's verify the PostHog configuration:
Also applies to: 13-13
✅ Verification successful
PostHog integration is consistently implemented across the codebase
The verification shows that:
- PostHog is consistently used across multiple components with proper hook initialization
- Event tracking follows a consistent pattern with
capturemethod - Event parameters (name, action, category) are consistently structured
- The "Hero - Sponsors" event name aligns with other hero-section events in the codebase
Let's verify the PostHog initialization:
PostHog integration is properly configured and consistently used
The verification confirms:
- PostHog is properly initialized in
providers.tsxwith environment variable configuration - The hook usage in
sponsor-item.tsxfollows the same pattern as other components - Event tracking implementation is consistent with the codebase standards
- The "Hero - Sponsors" event naming aligns with other hero section events
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify PostHog configuration and consistent usage across the codebase
# Check if required environment variables are documented
echo "Checking .env.example for PostHog configuration..."
cat .env.example | grep -i posthog
# Check for consistent PostHog usage pattern
echo "Checking PostHog usage pattern across the codebase..."
rg "usePostHog|posthog\.capture" -A 2
Length of output: 15099
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check PostHog initialization
rg "posthog\.(init|load)" -A 2
# Check if there's a central PostHog config
fd "posthog" --type f
Length of output: 276
apps/docs/.env.example (1)
19-20: LGTM!
The added newline improves readability by separating different configuration sections.
apps/docs/components/figma-button.tsx (2)
4-7: LGTM! PostHog integration looks correct
The PostHog hook is properly imported and initialized according to PostHog's React integration guidelines.
18-23: Verify consistent event tracking pattern across codebase
The PostHog event tracking implementation looks correct. Let's verify the consistency of event naming and properties across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Event tracking implementation follows consistent patterns across codebase
The PostHog event tracking implementation shows consistent patterns across the codebase:
- All events use
posthog.capture()with a descriptive event name - Events consistently include
actionandcategoryornameproperties - Common action types: "click", "press", "search"
- Well-organized categories: "docs", "landing-page", "theme", etc.
The implementation in figma-button.tsx follows the same pattern as other components, with proper event naming and consistent property structure.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent PostHog event tracking patterns
# Search for PostHog capture calls to verify naming conventions
rg "posthog\.capture\(" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for other potential tracking implementations that might have been missed
rg "trackEvent|analytics|track\(" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 159
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for PostHog capture calls without file type restrictions
rg "posthog\.capture\("
# Search for other potential tracking implementations
rg "trackEvent|analytics|track\("
# List all TypeScript/React files to understand the codebase structure
fd "\.(ts|tsx)$"
Length of output: 75033
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for consistent event tracking patterns in PostHog capture calls
rg -A 2 "posthog\.capture\(" --no-heading
Length of output: 6338
apps/docs/components/featurebase/fb-feedback-button.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM: PostHog import added correctly
The import of usePostHog from the official PostHog React package is appropriate for the analytics transition.
12-12: Verify PostHog configuration
Please ensure that the required PostHog environment variables are properly configured:
- NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY
- NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST
✅ Verification successful
PostHog configuration is properly implemented
The PostHog configuration is correctly set up in the application:
- PostHog is initialized in
apps/docs/app/providers.tsxwith the required environment variables - The application uses a proxy configuration in
next.config.jsto handle PostHog requests securely through/ingestendpoint - The configuration includes proper settings for API host and person profiles
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if PostHog environment variables are documented
# Check .env.example file for PostHog configuration
echo "Checking .env.example for PostHog configuration..."
rg "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_(KEY|HOST)" -A 1
Length of output: 429
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for environment variables in .env.example and similar files
fd -e example -e env -e env.example -x cat {}
# Check for PostHog configuration in Next.js config files
fd -e config.js -e config.ts -x cat {}
# Look for PostHog initialization patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'posthog.init($$$)'
Length of output: 28925
apps/docs/components/featurebase/fb-roadmap-link.tsx (1)
4-4: LGTM! PostHog integration looks correct.
The PostHog implementation follows best practices with proper event naming and properties structure.
Let's verify the environment variable usage:
Also applies to: 15-15, 18-22
✅ Verification successful
Environment variables are properly configured for PostHog
The PostHog integration is correctly set up in the application:
- PostHog initialization is properly configured in
providers.tsxwith the required environment variables - The Next.js configuration includes the necessary rewrites for PostHog endpoints
- The environment variables
NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEYandNEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOSTare used consistently
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify PostHog environment variables are documented
# Expected: Find references to NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY and NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST
# Check for environment variable documentation
rg -l "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_(KEY|HOST)" .env.example README.md docs/
# Check for the feedback URL environment variable
rg "NEXT_PUBLIC_FB_FEEDBACK_URL" .env.example README.md docs/
Length of output: 223
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for environment variables and configuration files
fd -t f ".env" -X cat {}
# Also check for any documentation about environment variables
fd -t f "README|CONTRIBUTING" -e md -X cat {}
# Look for PostHog configuration in the codebase
rg -A 5 "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG"
Length of output: 55752
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for the environment variables in the Next.js configuration files
fd -t f "next.config" -X cat {}
# Check for any environment setup files in the docs app
fd -t f -p "apps/docs/.env*" -X cat {}
# Look for PostHog initialization in the codebase
ast-grep --pattern 'posthog.init($_, {$$$})'
Length of output: 1648
apps/docs/components/featurebase/fb-changelog-button.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM: Import change aligns with PostHog migration
The import change correctly switches from the custom tracking utility to PostHog's React hook.
12-12: Verify PostHog configuration
The component assumes PostHog is properly configured. Ensure the required environment variables are set:
NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEYNEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST
✅ Verification successful
PostHog configuration is properly implemented
The PostHog configuration is correctly handled in apps/docs/app/providers.tsx:
- PostHog is only initialized in production environments (wrapped in
__PROD__check) - Environment variables are properly referenced in the initialization
- The configuration includes proper settings for API and UI hosts
- The non-null assertion on
NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEYensures the key is present
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for PostHog environment variables in configuration files
# Check for PostHog environment variables in .env files
echo "Checking .env files for PostHog configuration..."
rg -l "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_(KEY|HOST)"
# Check for PostHog configuration in other common config files
echo "Checking other configuration files..."
fd -e config.js -e config.ts -X rg "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_(KEY|HOST)"
Length of output: 330
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the PostHog configuration in providers.tsx
echo "Content of providers.tsx:"
cat apps/docs/app/providers.tsx
# Look for any environment variable validation or configuration
echo -e "\nChecking for environment variable validation:"
rg -A 5 "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG" apps/docs/app/providers.tsx
Length of output: 1863
apps/docs/next.config.js (1)
25-40: LGTM! The PostHog rewrite rules are correctly implemented.
The rewrite rules properly handle the proxying of PostHog analytics requests through the application domain, including static assets, API requests, and the feature flags endpoint.
apps/docs/components/demos/custom-button.tsx (3)
5-5: LGTM: Proper import of PostHog React hook
The import statement correctly uses the React-specific hook from PostHog, which is the recommended approach for React applications.
9-9: LGTM: Correct hook initialization
The PostHog hook is properly initialized at the component level, following React hooks best practices.
32-35: Verify PostHog environment configuration
The event tracking implementation looks correct, but we should ensure the required PostHog environment variables are properly configured.
Consider adding error handling around the PostHog capture to prevent potential runtime errors:
- posthog.capture("LandingPage - Confetti Button", {
+ try {
+ posthog.capture("LandingPage - Confetti Button", {
action: "press",
category: "landing-page",
});
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error("Failed to capture analytics event:", error);
+ }✅ Verification successful
Let me check the PostHog initialization in the providers file to verify the configuration.
PostHog is properly configured with error handling at initialization
The PostHog configuration is correctly implemented in apps/docs/app/providers.tsx with:
- Proper initialization only on the client side
- Environment variables
NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEYandNEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOSTare used - Production-only activation through
__PROD__check - PostHog provider wrapping for React context
While error handling around individual capture calls could be added, it's not critical since:
- PostHog initialization already has implicit error handling (non-blocking)
- Analytics failures shouldn't impact the user experience
- The current implementation follows PostHog's recommended patterns
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify PostHog environment variables in the repository
# Check for environment variable definitions
echo "Checking for PostHog environment variables..."
rg -l "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_(KEY|HOST)"
# Check for example environment files
echo "Checking example environment files..."
fd -g "*.env*"
Length of output: 271
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check PostHog initialization in providers.tsx
echo "Checking PostHog initialization..."
cat "apps/docs/app/providers.tsx"
# Look for any error handling around PostHog usage
echo -e "\nChecking PostHog error handling patterns..."
rg "posthog\.capture" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 11449
apps/docs/app/providers.tsx (3)
24-40: Previous review comments are still applicable
The following unaddressed issues from previous reviews remain valid:
- Error handling and environment variable validation
- Missing cleanup in the useEffect hook
Please refer to the previous review comments for the suggested implementations.
43-47: Provider composition looks good, verify production flag
The provider hierarchy is correctly implemented with conditional PostHog initialization in production only.
Let's verify the PROD flag implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Production flag implementation is correctly used for PostHog analytics
The __PROD__ flag is properly implemented and used:
- Defined in
utils/env.tsasprocess.env.NODE_ENV === "production" - Correctly imported and used in
providers.tsxto conditionally wrap components with PostHog analytics only in production - PostHog initialization is properly handled with environment variables and browser check
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of __PROD__ flag
echo "Checking __PROD__ implementation..."
rg "__PROD__" "apps/docs/utils/"
Length of output: 386
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the ProviderWrapper implementation to verify __PROD__ usage
rg -A 5 "ProviderWrapper" "apps/docs/app/providers.tsx"
Length of output: 524
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the complete providers.tsx file to understand the full context
cat "apps/docs/app/providers.tsx"
Length of output: 1389
28-28: Verify PostHog proxy configuration
The PostHog configuration uses "/ingest" as the API host, which suggests a proxy setup. Ensure that the necessary server configuration is in place to handle this endpoint.
✅ Verification successful
PostHog proxy configuration is properly set up
The Next.js configuration file (next.config.js) already includes the necessary proxy configuration through rewrites:
/ingest/:path*is properly mapped tohttps://us.i.posthog.com/:path*/ingest/static/:path*is mapped tohttps://us-assets.i.posthog.com/static/:path*/ingest/decideis mapped tohttps://us.i.posthog.com/decide
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for proxy configuration in next.config.js or similar files
echo "Checking for proxy configuration..."
fd -t f "next.config" apps/docs/ -x cat {}
Length of output: 1288
apps/docs/components/docs/pager.tsx (2)
5-5: LGTM! Clean PostHog integration.
The PostHog hook is properly imported and initialized following React best practices.
Also applies to: 23-23
Line range hint 26-30: Verify analytics event naming convention.
The event tracking implementation looks good, maintaining the same data structure. However, let's verify if other components follow the same event naming pattern for consistency.
✅ Verification successful
Analytics event naming convention follows consistent pattern across components
The verification shows that all components in the docs application follow a consistent event naming pattern:
ComponentName - Actionformat (e.g., "DocsPager - Click", "MDXComponents - Click")- Consistent event payload structure with
category,action, and optionaldatafields - All docs-related components use "docs" as the category
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check event naming patterns across the codebase
# Expected: Events should follow "ComponentName - Action" pattern
# Search for PostHog capture calls to verify naming convention
rg -A 1 "posthog\.capture\(" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for component event tracking to ensure consistent parameters
ast-grep --pattern 'posthog.capture($EVENT, {
category: $_,
action: $_,
$$$
})'
Length of output: 1909
apps/docs/components/theme-switch.tsx (2)
Line range hint 9-30: LGTM! Clean migration to PostHog analytics
The implementation correctly replaces the VA analytics with PostHog while maintaining the same event tracking functionality. The code is clean and follows React best practices.
9-9: Verify PostHog configuration is properly set up
The PostHog integration requires specific environment variables. Let's verify they are properly configured.
Also applies to: 21-21
apps/docs/components/blog-post.tsx (2)
9-9: LGTM! PostHog import is correctly implemented.
The import statement follows the proper convention and uses the official PostHog React package.
16-16: Verify PostHog configuration in the application.
The hook is correctly implemented, but ensure that PostHog is properly initialized with the required environment variables mentioned in the PR description.
✅ Verification successful
PostHog is properly configured with environment variables and initialization
The verification confirms that:
- Required environment variables
NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEYandNEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOSTare defined in.env.example - PostHog is correctly initialized in
apps/docs/app/providers.tsxwith proper configuration:- Uses the environment variables for key and host
- Sets up API host for ingestion
- Configures person profiles for identified users only
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify PostHog configuration
# Check for PostHog initialization and environment variables
# Check for environment variables in .env.example
echo "Checking .env.example for PostHog variables..."
rg "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_" apps/docs/.env.example
# Check for PostHog initialization
echo "Checking PostHog initialization..."
rg -A 5 "posthog.init" apps/docs/
Length of output: 731
apps/docs/components/marketing/features-grid.tsx (3)
4-4: LGTM: PostHog import added correctly
The import statement for the PostHog React hook is properly placed and uses the official package.
39-40: LGTM: PostHog hook initialized properly
The PostHog hook is correctly initialized at the component level following React hooks best practices.
39-40: Verify PostHog initialization with missing environment variables
The PR requires NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY and NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST environment variables. Ensure the component gracefully handles cases where these variables are not set.
✅ Verification successful
PostHog initialization is properly handled for missing environment variables
The component already has proper handling for environment variables:
- PostHog is only initialized in production (
__PROD__) - The
PostHogProvideris only rendered in production - The initialization is wrapped in a client-side effect
- The
!operator inNEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY!ensures TypeScript type safety while the runtime behavior remains unaffected if the variable is undefined
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for PostHog initialization and environment variable handling
rg -l "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for PostHog initialization and environment variable handling with correct file type
rg -l "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG"
# Also search for PostHog usage and initialization patterns
rg -A 5 "usePostHog|PostHogProvider"
Length of output: 17226
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check PostHog initialization and environment variable handling in providers.tsx
cat apps/docs/app/providers.tsx
Length of output: 1389
apps/docs/components/docs/components/component-links.tsx (1)
4-4: LGTM: PostHog import added correctly
The PostHog React hook import is properly added, replacing the previous analytics tracking utility.
apps/docs/components/marketing/hero/hero.tsx (1)
7-7: PostHog setup looks good!
The PostHog hook is correctly imported and initialized at the component level.
Let's verify the required environment variables are properly configured:
Also applies to: 19-20
✅ Verification successful
PostHog configuration is properly set up
The PostHog setup is correctly implemented in the application:
- PostHog is initialized at the app level in
providers.tsxwith the required environment variables - The configuration is properly wrapped in a production check
- The hook usage in the Hero component is consistent with this setup
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for PostHog environment variables in the project
# Expected: Should find NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY and NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST
# Search for PostHog environment variables in .env files and documentation
rg -l "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_(KEY|HOST)"
Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of providers.tsx to see how PostHog is configured
cat apps/docs/app/providers.tsx
Length of output: 1389
apps/docs/components/marketing/install-banner.tsx (1)
8-8: Verify PostHog initialization across the application
The PostHog hook initialization looks correct. Let's verify its consistent usage across the application.
Also applies to: 39-40
✅ Verification successful
PostHog integration is properly configured and consistently used
The verification shows:
- PostHog is correctly initialized in
providers.tsxwith proper environment variables - The
usePostHoghook is consistently used across all components - All components properly import from
posthog-js/react - No direct PostHog usage outside of the hook pattern was found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check PostHog initialization patterns across the codebase
# Expected: Consistent initialization pattern using usePostHog hook
# Check PostHog imports
echo "=== PostHog Import Patterns ==="
rg "import.*posthog.*react"
# Check PostHog hook usage
echo -e "\n=== PostHog Hook Usage ==="
rg "usePostHog\(\)"
# Check for any direct PostHog usage without hooks
echo -e "\n=== Direct PostHog Usage (potential issues) ==="
rg "posthog\." --type ts --type tsx | grep -v "usePostHog"
Length of output: 3656
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the PostHog provider setup and configuration
echo "=== PostHog Provider Setup ==="
rg -A 5 "PostHogProvider" apps/docs/app/providers.tsx
# Check for any PostHog initialization or configuration
echo -e "\n=== PostHog Configuration ==="
rg "posthog\." apps/docs/app/providers.tsx
# Check for environment variables usage
echo -e "\n=== Environment Variables ==="
rg "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG" apps/docs/
Length of output: 853
apps/docs/components/pro-banner.tsx (3)
7-7: LGTM: PostHog React hook import
The import is correctly placed and uses the appropriate React-specific PostHog integration.
14-15: LGTM: PostHog hook initialization
The hook is properly initialized at the component level following React hooks best practices.
7-20: Verify PostHog configuration documentation
Since this component depends on PostHog, let's ensure the required environment variables are properly documented.
✅ Verification successful
PostHog configuration is properly implemented and documented
The PostHog configuration is correctly implemented in the codebase:
- PostHog is initialized in
apps/docs/app/providers.tsxwith required environment variables:NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEYNEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST
- Environment variables are documented in
.env.examplefiles at:/apps/docs/.env.example/.env.example
- Proper proxy configuration is set up in
next.config.jsfor PostHog endpoints - PostHog provider is correctly wrapped around the application in the providers component
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if environment variables are documented in relevant files
echo "Checking for environment variables documentation..."
rg -l "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_(KEY|HOST)" --type md
# Check for PostHog initialization
echo "Checking for PostHog initialization..."
rg -l "PostHogProvider|posthog.init" --type tsx --type ts
Length of output: 338
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if environment variables are documented in relevant files
echo "Checking for environment variables documentation..."
rg -l "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG" .
# Check for PostHog initialization and configuration
echo "Checking for PostHog initialization..."
rg "posthog" -A 5 .
# Check for environment files
echo "Checking for environment files..."
fd "\.env" --hidden
Length of output: 30511
apps/docs/components/mdx-components.tsx (2)
6-6: LGTM!
The PostHog React hook import is correctly placed and properly sourced from the official package.
6-6: Verify PostHog configuration documentation
Since we're adding PostHog integration, let's ensure the required environment variables are properly documented.
✅ Verification successful
PostHog configuration is properly documented
The required environment variables NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY and NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST are correctly documented in apps/docs/.env.example file.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if PostHog environment variables are documented
# Check if variables are documented in .env.example or similar files
echo "Checking for PostHog environment variables documentation..."
fd -t f -e example -e md -e mdx | xargs rg "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_(KEY|HOST)"
Length of output: 206
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any environment-related files and documentation
echo "Checking for environment files..."
fd -t f "^\.env" -X ls -la
echo -e "\nChecking README and documentation files..."
fd -t f "README|CONTRIBUTING|DEVELOPMENT" -e md -e mdx -X ls -la
echo -e "\nChecking content of environment files..."
fd -t f "^\.env" -X cat
echo -e "\nChecking for PostHog mentions in documentation..."
rg -i "posthog|analytics" -g "*.md" -g "*.mdx" -g "*.env*"
Length of output: 8331
apps/docs/components/marketing/support.tsx (3)
6-6: LGTM! Clean import of PostHog.
The import follows React hooks naming convention and aligns with the PR objective of replacing 'va' with PostHog.
98-98: LGTM! Proper hook initialization.
The PostHog hook is correctly initialized at the component level, following React hooks rules.
106-109: LGTM! Clean event tracking migration.
The event tracking has been properly migrated to PostHog while maintaining the same event name and parameters structure.
Let's verify the consistency of PostHog event tracking across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Event tracking migration is complete and consistent
The PostHog event tracking implementation for "Support - Become a sponsor" is properly implemented and there are no remaining legacy analytics tracking methods. The search results confirm that:
- There are no remaining
trackEventreferences for this event - The PostHog implementation is the only tracking instance for this event
- No conflicting analytics imports are present in the file
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining 'va' tracking references
rg "trackEvent.*Support - Become a sponsor"
# Search for consistent PostHog event naming
rg "posthog\.capture.*Support - Become a sponsor"
Length of output: 192
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any other similar event tracking patterns to ensure consistency
rg "trackEvent.*Support" -A 2
rg "posthog\.capture.*Support" -A 2
# Also check for any remaining analytics imports that might indicate mixed usage
rg "import.*analytics"
rg "import.*va"
Length of output: 21031
apps/docs/components/docs/sidebar.tsx (3)
4-4: LGTM: PostHog import added correctly
The PostHog React hook import is properly placed and uses the correct package path.
69-69: LGTM: PostHog hook initialized properly
The usePostHog hook is correctly initialized at the component level, following React hooks best practices.
Line range hint 1-289: Verify complete removal of old analytics
Let's ensure all references to the old analytics system have been removed.
✅ Verification successful
PostHog migration is complete and old analytics have been removed
The verification shows that all instances of "va" and "trackEvent" in the codebase are just part of example data (specifically the name "[email protected]" in mock data) and not related to the old analytics system. Additionally, PostHog is properly integrated across multiple components in the docs app.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old analytics system
echo "Checking for remaining 'va' analytics references..."
rg -i "trackEvent|va\." --type ts --type tsx
echo "Checking for any missed PostHog environment variables..."
rg -i "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_(KEY|HOST)" .env* || echo "No .env files found with PostHog config"
Length of output: 459
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old analytics system with correct file type
echo "Checking for remaining 'va' analytics references..."
rg -i "trackEvent|va\." -t ts -t jsx -t tsx
echo "Checking for PostHog imports and usage..."
rg -i "posthog" -t ts -t jsx -t tsx
Length of output: 349
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old analytics system
echo "Checking for remaining 'va' analytics references..."
find . -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" \) -exec grep -l -i "trackEvent\|va\." {} \;
echo "Checking for PostHog imports and usage..."
find . -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" \) -exec grep -l -i "posthog" {} \;
Length of output: 2290
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of files that contain 'va' or 'trackEvent' to ensure they're not analytics related
echo "Checking content of relevant files (excluding node_modules)..."
for file in $(find ./apps ./packages -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" \) -exec grep -l -i "trackEvent\|va\." {} \;); do
echo "=== $file ==="
grep -i "trackEvent\|va\." "$file" -A 2 -B 2
done
Length of output: 6567
apps/docs/components/navbar.tsx (1)
32-32: LGTM: PostHog initialization
The PostHog hook is properly imported and initialized at the component level.
Also applies to: 63-64
apps/docs/components/cmdk.tsx (1)
18-18: Consider PostHog initialization timing
The PostHog hook is correctly imported and initialized. However, ensure that PostHog is properly initialized with the environment variables (NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY and NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST) before any event capture calls.
Also applies to: 142-142
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the initialization setup further by checking how the providers are used.
Let me check how the providers are used in the root layout.
Based on the review of the codebase, I can now provide a final response:
PostHog initialization is properly configured
The PostHog integration is correctly set up with:
- PostHog initialization in
apps/docs/app/providers.tsxwith required environment variables - Provider wrapped around the entire application in the root layout
- Initialization happens before any event capture in the Cmdk component
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if PostHog is properly initialized with environment variables
rg -A 5 "posthog\.init"
Length of output: 408
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check how PostHog provider is used in the application
rg -A 5 "PostHogProvider"
# Check the root layout or main app component
fd "layout.tsx|page.tsx" apps/docs/app/ --exec cat {}
Length of output: 101196
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check how the providers are used in the root layout and if PostHog is initialized before any event capture
cat apps/docs/app/layout.tsx
Length of output: 2347
| @@ -26,10 +26,12 @@ const ButtonLink = ({ | |||
| href: string; | |||
| tooltip?: string | ReactNode; | |||
| }) => { | |||
| const posthog = usePostHog(); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Environment variables for PostHog need documentation
While PostHog is properly initialized with the required environment variables (NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY and NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST) in apps/docs/app/providers.tsx, these variables are not documented in any .env files or documentation. To ensure proper setup:
- Add these variables to an
.env.examplefile in theapps/docsdirectory - Document the required PostHog configuration in the project's README or documentation
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify PostHog environment configuration
The PostHog integration requires environment variables to be set. Ensure that NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_KEY and NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOST are properly configured in the .env file.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if environment variables are documented
rg -l "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_(KEY|HOST)" --type md
Length of output: 50
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for environment variable documentation in various config files and READMEs
rg -i "NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG"
# Check for PostHog configuration in common config locations
fd -e env -e env.example -e env.sample
Length of output: 242
| @@ -71,6 +70,7 @@ | |||
| "parse-numeric-range": "1.2.0", | |||
| "prism-react-renderer": "^1.2.1", | |||
| "querystring": "^0.2.1", | |||
| "posthog-js": "1.187.1", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Update posthog-js to the latest version 1.187.2
The current version 1.187.1 is slightly outdated. While there are no security vulnerabilities affecting this version (the only known vulnerability affects versions < 1.57.2), it's recommended to use the latest stable version 1.187.2 to ensure all bug fixes and improvements are included.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify PostHog version for security and stability
The specific version lock of posthog-js at 1.187.1 should be verified for security vulnerabilities and stability.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for latest versions and security advisories for posthog-js
# Check NPM for latest versions
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/posthog-js | jq '.["dist-tags"].latest'
# Check for security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "posthog-js") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 646
| @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ const Code = ({ | |||
| const isMultiLine = (children as string)?.split?.("\n")?.length > 2; | |||
| const language = (className?.replace(/language-/, "") ?? "jsx") as Language; | |||
| const codeString = String(children).trim(); | |||
| const posthog = usePostHog(); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add a null check for PostHog instance
While the PostHog integration looks good, we should add a safety check to handle cases where PostHog might not be initialized (e.g., development/test environments).
Apply this diff:
const posthog = usePostHog();
if (!className) {
return <InlineCode>{children}</InlineCode>;
}
return (
<Components.Snippet
disableTooltip
fullWidth
hideSymbol
classNames={{...}}
codeString={codeString}
onCopy={() => {
- posthog.capture("MDXComponents - Copy", {
- category: "docs",
- action: "copyCode",
- });
+ posthog?.capture?.("MDXComponents - Copy", {
+ category: "docs",
+ action: "copyCode",
+ });
}}
>Also applies to: 150-153
| @@ -159,9 +160,10 @@ const Code = ({ | |||
|
|
|||
| const Link = ({href, children}: {href?: string; children?: React.ReactNode}) => { | |||
| const isExternal = href?.startsWith("http"); | |||
| const posthog = usePostHog(); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add safety checks for PostHog and href
The Link component's event tracking needs two safety improvements:
- Handle cases where PostHog isn't initialized
- Ensure href is defined before sending it as event data
Apply this diff:
const posthog = usePostHog();
const handlePress = () => {
- posthog.capture("MDXComponents - Click", {
- category: "docs",
- action: "click",
- data: href || "",
- });
+ if (href) {
+ posthog?.capture?.("MDXComponents - Click", {
+ category: "docs",
+ action: "click",
+ data: href,
+ });
+ }
};Also applies to: 166-170
Closes #
📝 Description
as titled.
please include the following variables in
.env.⛳️ Current behavior (updates)
🚀 New behavior
💣 Is this a breaking change (Yes/No):
📝 Additional Information
Summary by CodeRabbit
Scrumbuissentry from the sponsors list, ensuring accurate sponsor representation.getAllSponsorsfunction to rely solely on external configuration for sponsor data.