fix: ensure NatsConnectionPool cannot overflow#1005
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
thanks for the fix @MiloszKrajewski it sounds like a long shot but nevertheless it was a bug. Can you also sign the commit please? CNCF policy we must have all commits signed in a PR. |
MiloszKrajewski
force-pushed
the
NatsConnectionPool-overflow
branch
from
November 25, 2025 20:04
ee9adce to
d86e893
Compare
Contributor
Author
I think it should be fine now. |
mtmk
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 11, 2025
* Add prioritized mode (#1011) * Add Publish Timeout on Disconnect (#1001) * Fix test flap (#1012) * Add test to promote mirrored to regular stream (#1008) * Add Nats-Expected-Last-Subject-Sequence-Subject (#1007) * Fix keyed NATS clients with configurations (#1006) * ensure NatsConnectionPool cannot overflow (#1005) * Fix stream config adjustments on update (#995) * Handel Unobserved Exceptions During Connection State Transitions (#999) * Added verification of the consumer sequence number for pull ordered consumers (#981) * Fix build warnings (#991) * Reduce closure allocations (#988)
Merged
mtmk
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 11, 2025
* Add prioritized mode (#1011) * Add Publish Timeout on Disconnect (#1001) * Fix test flap (#1012) * Add test to promote mirrored to regular stream (#1008) * Add Nats-Expected-Last-Subject-Sequence-Subject (#1007) * Fix keyed NATS clients with configurations (#1006) * ensure NatsConnectionPool cannot overflow (#1005) * Fix stream config adjustments on update (#995) * Handel Unobserved Exceptions During Connection State Transitions (#999) * Added verification of the consumer sequence number for pull ordered consumers (#981) * Fix build warnings (#991) * Reduce closure allocations (#988)
This was referenced Dec 15, 2025
This was referenced Mar 2, 2026
This was referenced Jul 13, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Call me paranoid but assuming someone can try to send 5000 messages per second (which is not insane) by taking connection from pool every time (which is not insane either) it gives service 5 days before crash (2**31/5000/60/60/24 = 4.97).
This is just about ensuring division returns positive number.