Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Split shell code out to support optional inclusion #354

Closed
skliper opened this issue Jan 21, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #418 or #433
Closed

Split shell code out to support optional inclusion #354

skliper opened this issue Jan 21, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #418 or #433
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@skliper
Copy link
Contributor

skliper commented Jan 21, 2020

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Execute in shell functionality is undesirable for some security conscious applications.

Describe the solution you'd like
Allow for optional inclusion (like network option?), respond as not implemented when not included.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Discussed security at length, diverse use cases require flexibility for user to decide.

Additional context
POSIX issue found in LGTM

Requester Info
Jacob Hageman - NASA/GSFC

@skliper skliper added this to the 5.1.0 milestone Jan 21, 2020
@skliper skliper self-assigned this Apr 13, 2020
skliper added a commit to skliper/osal that referenced this issue Apr 14, 2020
skliper added a commit to skliper/osal that referenced this issue Apr 14, 2020
Defaults to not include OS_ShellOutputToFile implementation
skliper added a commit to skliper/osal that referenced this issue Apr 20, 2020
Defaults to not include OS_ShellOutputToFile implementation
astrogeco added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 22, 2020
Fix #354, Shell related API separated for optional implementation
@astrogeco astrogeco linked a pull request Apr 27, 2020 that will close this issue
astrogeco pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 1, 2020
Defaults to not include OS_ShellOutputToFile implementation
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
1 participant