Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #1840, Add Null check for CFE_ResourceId_FindNext #1842

Conversation

zanzaben
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the contribution
Fixes #1840
Adds Null check to CFE_ResourceId_FindNext

Testing performed
Build and run unit test

Expected behavior changes
No impact to behavior

System(s) tested on
Ubuntu 20.04

Additional context
If this gets into master before #1782 then a Functional Test will need to be added there. Otherwise it should be added here.

Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Alex Campbell GSFC

@zanzaben zanzaben force-pushed the fix1840_ResourceID_FindNext_null_check branch from c25c8e5 to aa72f85 Compare August 18, 2021 17:30
@zanzaben zanzaben requested a review from skliper August 18, 2021 17:34
@astrogeco astrogeco changed the base branch from main to integration-candidate August 18, 2021 17:59
@astrogeco astrogeco merged commit b8df511 into nasa:integration-candidate Aug 18, 2021
astrogeco added a commit to nasa/cFS that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2021
Comment on lines +124 to +128
if (CheckFunc == NULL)
{
return CFE_ES_BAD_ARGUMENT;
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggest returning CFE_RESOURCEID_UNDEFINED... otherwise this is a conversion from an error code to a resource id type.

@skliper
Copy link
Contributor

skliper commented Aug 18, 2021

@astrogeco - maybe a hot fix? Otherwise I don't think this will work with strict resource IDs.

@zanzaben
Copy link
Contributor Author

@astrogeco - maybe a hot fix? Otherwise I don't think this will work with strict resource IDs.

Crud, it doesn't work with strict resource IDs. I have a fix ready. Should I push it here?

@astrogeco
Copy link
Contributor

push it to IC

astrogeco added a commit to nasa/cFS that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2021
astrogeco added a commit to nasa/cFS that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2021
**Combines**

nasa/cFE# v6.8.0-rc1+dev933
nasa/osal# v5.1.0-rc1+dev594

**Includes**

*osal*

nasa/osal#1131, add test case types similar to NA

*cFE*

nasa/cFE#1803, Add software bus tests
nasa/cFE#1756, separate variable for OSAL status
nasa/cFE#1809, increase SB pool max size bucket
nasa/cFE#1842, Add Null check for CFE_ResourceId_FindNext
nasa/cFE#1828, Improve TBL coverage tests
nasa/cFE#1833, Clean up Message ID Functional Test #1824, Add missing cases for msg id func tests
nasa/cFE#1832, Combine SB Set/Get message characteristics group #1831, Consolidate msg get/set doxygen group
nasa/cFE#1836, Adding coverage tests to cFE TIME
nasa/cFE#1848, enable strict resource id w/OMIT_DEPRECATED
nasa/cFE#1845, HOTFIX IC-20210819, type correction TBL coverage test
nasa/cFE#1806, Add test for ES BackgroundWakeup
nasa/cFE#1813, Success Test for CFE_ES_RestartApp
nasa/cFE#1814, Subscribe to Message Limit Greater Than CFE_PLATFORM_SB_DEFAULT_MSG_LIMIT
nasa/cFE#1811, Success Test for CFE_ES_GetMemPoolStats
nasa/cFE#1822, Group MSG APIs documentation by header type
nasa/cFE#1816, add retroactive CFE status asserts
nasa/cFE#1854, remove unused CFE_TBL_ERR_BAD_APP_ID
nasa/cFE#1855, correct syslog message in pool create
nasa/cFE#1853, remove unused CFE_ES_POOL_BOUNDS_ERROR
nasa/cFE#1859, remove unused CFE_TBL_ERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND
nasa/cFE#1856, Check error ctr to TransmitMsg test
nasa/cFE#1857, End Child Task requirement remove error code
nasa/cFE#1782, Add functional tests for resource misc

Co-authored-by: Jacob Hageman           <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Joseph Hickey           <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alex Campbell           <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Niall Mullane           <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ariel Adams             <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jose F Martinez Pedraza <[email protected]>
@skliper skliper added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Sep 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CFE_ResourceId_FindNext can Seg Fault
4 participants