Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

This commit adds a Layout plugin #8

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2021
Merged

This commit adds a Layout plugin #8

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2021

Conversation

davidcassany
Copy link
Collaborator

The Layout plugin mostly allows to expand the last partition to the disk
geometry and/or add additional partitions over the unpartitioned space.

In case there is no unpartitioned space on disk no changes are applied.

Fixes rancher/elemental-toolkit#219

Signed-off-by: David Cassany [email protected]

@davidcassany davidcassany marked this pull request as draft June 6, 2021 21:33
@davidcassany davidcassany marked this pull request as ready for review June 9, 2021 15:16
@davidcassany davidcassany requested a review from mudler June 9, 2021 15:16
pkg/plugins/layout.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Owner

@mudler mudler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

besides the small nitpicks it looks good!

The Layout plugin mostly allows to expand the last partition to the disk
geometry and/or add additional partitions over the unpartitioned space.

In case there is no unpartitioned space on disk no changes are applied.

Fixes rancher/elemental-toolkit#219

Signed-off-by: David Cassany <[email protected]>
@davidcassany davidcassany merged commit 0bb53ba into master Jun 10, 2021
@davidcassany davidcassany deleted the layout_plugin branch June 10, 2021 11:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Partitioning possibilities in YIP
2 participants