Skip to content

[simage] Fix optional dependencies#15683

Merged
dan-shaw merged 3 commits intomicrosoft:masterfrom
ras0219-msft:dev/roschuma/simage
Jan 19, 2021
Merged

[simage] Fix optional dependencies#15683
dan-shaw merged 3 commits intomicrosoft:masterfrom
ras0219-msft:dev/roschuma/simage

Conversation

@ras0219-msft
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@JackBoosY JackBoosY self-assigned this Jan 18, 2021
@JackBoosY JackBoosY added category:port-bug The issue is with a library, which is something the port should already support info:internal labels Jan 18, 2021
@JackBoosY JackBoosY added the info:needs-maintainer-attention Lets the current 'on rotation' vcpkg maintainer know they need to look at this. label Jan 18, 2021
@dan-shaw dan-shaw merged commit ab077c4 into microsoft:master Jan 19, 2021
Port-Version: 1
Description: Image file format library abstraction layer
Build-Depends: giflib (linux|uwp), libjpeg-turbo (linux|uwp), libpng (linux|uwp), libsndfile (linux|uwp), tiff (linux|uwp), libvorbis (linux|uwp)
Build-Depends: giflib (!windows&!osx), libjpeg-turbo (!windows&!osx), libpng (!windows&!osx), libsndfile, tiff (!windows&!osx), libvorbis, zlib (!windows&!osx)
Copy link
Contributor

@dg0yt dg0yt Jun 19, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

!windows also excludes uwp. This is different than before, and it doesn't align with the OSX_OR_WINDOWS variable in portfile.cmake. What is the desired state for UWP?
Now this caused the tiff update to 4.3.0 to pass through CI without testing simage, but hits CI for ports which happen to install tiff before simage for UWP: #17519, #18393, #18546

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

category:port-bug The issue is with a library, which is something the port should already support info:needs-maintainer-attention Lets the current 'on rotation' vcpkg maintainer know they need to look at this.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants