Skip to content

Conversation

@ashubham
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #2762

@ashubham
Copy link
Contributor Author

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree

@ashubham
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please review @orta

Copy link
Contributor

@orta orta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, looks good to me - thanks, you'll need to wait until someone with write access merges it though ( I'd recommend using patch-package till then)

@jakebailey
Copy link
Member

This LGTM but I'm not sure what's going on with CI. I'll try a close/reopen.

@jakebailey jakebailey closed this May 16, 2023
@jakebailey jakebailey reopened this May 16, 2023
@jakebailey
Copy link
Member

Hm, maybe it's that version bump that is failing.

@jakebailey
Copy link
Member

Fixed the lock, but, I'm unsure if we need to also start bumping reverse deps to stop multiple versions from getting pulled in due to the use of exact versions. Not sure if there's something about version bumping I'm missing in this repo.

Copy link
Member

@jakebailey jakebailey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but will merge/release this with the other PRs that require package publishes.

@orta
Copy link
Contributor

orta commented Jul 25, 2023

There's a script

- run: node test/verifyPackageVersions.js
which will sync verify the internal references are consistent ( and update them to be afterwards)

@jakebailey jakebailey mentioned this pull request Jul 25, 2023
4 tasks
@jakebailey
Copy link
Member

With bump versions with #2904 to minimize the waiting within the current infrastructure.

@jakebailey jakebailey merged commit c620f50 into microsoft:v2 Jul 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

typescript-vfs still accesses local storage even when storer is provided

3 participants