Skip to content

docs: add cover image and simplify quickstart documentation#135

Merged
akshaydeo merged 1 commit intomainfrom
06-27-docs_main_readme_revamp
Jun 27, 2025
Merged

docs: add cover image and simplify quickstart documentation#135
akshaydeo merged 1 commit intomainfrom
06-27-docs_main_readme_revamp

Conversation

@Pratham-Mishra04
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Enhanced README with Visual Elements and Improved Documentation Structure

This PR adds visual elements and restructures the documentation to make it more user-friendly:

  • Added a cover image to the README for better visual identity
  • Simplified the quickstart section to focus on the HTTP transport (30-second setup)
  • Removed the overview section as its content was redundant with other sections
  • Created a dedicated core-package.md documentation file with comprehensive guidance on using Bifrost as a Go package
  • Reorganized the "Getting Started" section to clearly distinguish between the two main usage patterns:
    1. As a Go package (core integration)
    2. As an HTTP API (transport layer)
  • Added feature highlighting SDK support and seamless integration with existing Generative AI SDKs
  • Included demo video for the package integration
  • Improved formatting and navigation throughout the documentation

These changes make the documentation more accessible while maintaining all the essential information for users.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Streamlined and simplified the README for improved clarity and brevity, including a new cover image, updated quickstart instructions, and reorganized usage sections.
    • Added a comprehensive guide for using the Bifrost core package as a Go library, covering setup, configuration, and advanced features.
    • Updated and reformatted the Table of Contents and repository structure for consistency.

Walkthrough

The README file was extensively revised to simplify instructions, clarify usage modes, and streamline content. A new documentation file, core-package.md, was added to provide comprehensive guidance on using Bifrost as a Go package, including implementation steps, configuration, and advanced features. No code or API signatures were altered.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
README.md Simplified and restructured quickstart and usage instructions; updated table of contents; removed detailed Go package usage examples; added cover image and new feature highlights; improved clarity and brevity.
docs/core-package.md Added new documentation detailing the use of Bifrost as a Go library, including setup, configuration, and advanced features.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant Bifrost Core Package
    participant Provider

    Developer->>Bifrost Core Package: Implement Account Interface
    Developer->>Bifrost Core Package: Initialize Client with Account
    Developer->>Bifrost Core Package: Send Chat Completion Request
    Bifrost Core Package->>Provider: Forward Request with Credentials
    Provider-->>Bifrost Core Package: Return LLM Response
    Bifrost Core Package-->>Developer: Deliver LLM Response
Loading

Suggested reviewers

  • akshaydeo
  • danpiths

Poem

In the warren of docs, we hopped and pruned,
Streamlined the guide, confusion marooned.
Now with a README, clear and neat,
And a core doc that can't be beat.
Rabbits rejoice, the path is shown—
Bifrost’s journey, simply known! 🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment
  • Commit Unit Tests in branch 06-27-docs_main_readme_revamp

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Pratham-Mishra04 Pratham-Mishra04 marked this pull request as ready for review June 27, 2025 17:01
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c559c93 and ad33158.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • docs/media/cover.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • docs/media/package-demo.mp4 is excluded by !**/*.mp4
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md (5 hunks)
  • docs/core-package.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#63
File: transports/bifrost-http/integrations/openai/types.go:89-119
Timestamp: 2025-06-10T11:00:02.875Z
Learning: In the Bifrost OpenAI integration (transports/bifrost-http/integrations/openai/types.go), the convertOpenAIContent function currently only handles the last image URL when multiple images are present in a content array. The user Pratham-Mishra04 has acknowledged this limitation and indicated it's part of a larger architectural issue that will be addressed comprehensively later, rather than with piecemeal fixes.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#54
File: core/schemas/provider.go:148-148
Timestamp: 2025-06-04T03:57:50.981Z
Learning: Breaking changes in the Bifrost codebase are managed by first merging and tagging core schema changes, then updating dependent code references in subsequent steps after the core version is released.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#103
File: .github/workflows/transport-dependency-update.yml:53-75
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:21:18.912Z
Learning: In the bifrost repository's transport dependency update workflow, when updating the core dependency to a new version using `go get`, the go.mod and go.sum files will always change in normal operation, making the safety check for changes more of a defensive programming practice rather than handling a common scenario.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#81
File: tests/core-providers/openai_test.go:1-2
Timestamp: 2025-06-16T04:29:53.409Z
Learning: In the Bifrost project, the user prefers to use `package main` for test files in the tests/core-providers directory rather than more descriptive package names like `coreproviders_test`.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#65
File: transports/bifrost-http/integrations/anthropic/types.go:140-146
Timestamp: 2025-06-10T13:51:52.859Z
Learning: In Bifrost core v1.0.9, ImageContent.Type was a pointer type (*string accessed via bifrost.Ptr), but in v1.0.10 it was changed to a value type (ImageContentType). When reviewing code, check the core version being used to determine the correct assignment pattern.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#94
File: core/bifrost.go:823-845
Timestamp: 2025-06-18T15:15:51.323Z
Learning: In the Bifrost project, the team prioritizes maintaining consistent error handling patterns over exposing detailed error context. All errors should be wrapped in the standard `BifrostError` structure rather than creating specific error types or exposing richer error details like exit codes or stderr output.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#94
File: core/schemas/bifrost.go:20-23
Timestamp: 2025-06-18T15:16:23.127Z
Learning: In the Bifrost project, BifrostConfig struct is never marshaled/unmarshaled, so serialization tags (json, yaml) are not needed for its fields.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#55
File: core/providers/anthropic.go:358-388
Timestamp: 2025-06-04T05:37:59.699Z
Learning: User Pratham-Mishra04 prefers not to extract small code duplications (around 2 lines) into helper functions, considering the overhead not worth it for such minor repetition.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#102
File: README.md:62-66
Timestamp: 2025-06-19T17:03:03.639Z
Learning: Pratham-Mishra04 prefers using the implicit 'latest' tag for the maximhq/bifrost Docker image rather than pinning to specific versions.
docs/core-package.md (5)
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#81
File: tests/core-providers/openai_test.go:1-2
Timestamp: 2025-06-16T04:29:53.409Z
Learning: In the Bifrost project, the user prefers to use `package main` for test files in the tests/core-providers directory rather than more descriptive package names like `coreproviders_test`.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#54
File: core/schemas/provider.go:148-148
Timestamp: 2025-06-04T03:57:50.981Z
Learning: Breaking changes in the Bifrost codebase are managed by first merging and tagging core schema changes, then updating dependent code references in subsequent steps after the core version is released.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#103
File: .github/workflows/transport-dependency-update.yml:53-75
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:21:18.912Z
Learning: In the bifrost repository's transport dependency update workflow, when updating the core dependency to a new version using `go get`, the go.mod and go.sum files will always change in normal operation, making the safety check for changes more of a defensive programming practice rather than handling a common scenario.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#84
File: transports/bifrost-http/main.go:2-2
Timestamp: 2025-06-15T16:05:13.489Z
Learning: For the Bifrost project, HTTP transport integration routers for new providers (like Mistral and Ollama) are implemented in separate PRs from the core provider support, following a focused PR strategy.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#63
File: transports/bifrost-http/integrations/openai/router.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-09T14:03:34.227Z
Learning: In the Bifrost HTTP transport layer (transports/bifrost-http/integrations/), request validation like checking for empty messages should be handled by the provider rather than at the transport layer. The transport layer should forward requests to Bifrost core/providers for validation.
README.md (21)
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#103
File: .github/workflows/transport-dependency-update.yml:53-75
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:21:18.912Z
Learning: In the bifrost repository's transport dependency update workflow, when updating the core dependency to a new version using `go get`, the go.mod and go.sum files will always change in normal operation, making the safety check for changes more of a defensive programming practice rather than handling a common scenario.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#54
File: core/schemas/provider.go:148-148
Timestamp: 2025-06-04T03:57:50.981Z
Learning: Breaking changes in the Bifrost codebase are managed by first merging and tagging core schema changes, then updating dependent code references in subsequent steps after the core version is released.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#65
File: transports/bifrost-http/integrations/anthropic/types.go:140-146
Timestamp: 2025-06-10T13:51:52.859Z
Learning: In Bifrost core v1.0.9, ImageContent.Type was a pointer type (*string accessed via bifrost.Ptr), but in v1.0.10 it was changed to a value type (ImageContentType). When reviewing code, check the core version being used to determine the correct assignment pattern.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#84
File: transports/bifrost-http/main.go:2-2
Timestamp: 2025-06-15T16:05:13.489Z
Learning: For the Bifrost project, HTTP transport integration routers for new providers (like Mistral and Ollama) are implemented in separate PRs from the core provider support, following a focused PR strategy.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#83
File: core/providers/mistral.go:168-170
Timestamp: 2025-06-15T14:24:49.882Z
Learning: In the Bifrost codebase, performance is prioritized over defensive copying for HTTP service operations. Specifically, shallow slice assignments in provider response handling are acceptable due to object pool reset patterns and JSON unmarshaling behavior that minimize practical data corruption risks.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#94
File: core/bifrost.go:823-845
Timestamp: 2025-06-18T15:15:51.323Z
Learning: In the Bifrost project, the team prioritizes maintaining consistent error handling patterns over exposing detailed error context. All errors should be wrapped in the standard `BifrostError` structure rather than creating specific error types or exposing richer error details like exit codes or stderr output.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#55
File: core/tests/e2e_tool_test.go:29-30
Timestamp: 2025-06-04T04:58:12.239Z
Learning: In the Bifrost project, environment variables should be used only for secrets (like API keys), not for general configuration. Test parameters like provider and model can be hardcoded at the start of test files for predictability and consistency.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#63
File: transports/bifrost-http/integrations/openai/types.go:89-119
Timestamp: 2025-06-10T11:00:02.875Z
Learning: In the Bifrost OpenAI integration (transports/bifrost-http/integrations/openai/types.go), the convertOpenAIContent function currently only handles the last image URL when multiple images are present in a content array. The user Pratham-Mishra04 has acknowledged this limitation and indicated it's part of a larger architectural issue that will be addressed comprehensively later, rather than with piecemeal fixes.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#63
File: transports/bifrost-http/integrations/openai/router.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-09T14:03:34.227Z
Learning: In the Bifrost HTTP transport layer (transports/bifrost-http/integrations/), request validation like checking for empty messages should be handled by the provider rather than at the transport layer. The transport layer should forward requests to Bifrost core/providers for validation.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#54
File: core/providers/bedrock.go:241-252
Timestamp: 2025-06-04T09:07:20.867Z
Learning: In the Bifrost codebase, when working with AWS Bedrock provider authentication, the preference is to let AWS handle access key validation naturally rather than adding preemptive checks for empty/blank access keys. This allows AWS to provide its own authentication error messages which can be more informative than custom validation errors.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#64
File: transports/bifrost-http/integrations/genai/types.go:470-515
Timestamp: 2025-06-10T11:06:57.716Z
Learning: Bifrost currently only supports images and does not support non-image blob types like audio, PDF, or other binary data formats.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#81
File: tests/core-providers/config/account.go:55-101
Timestamp: 2025-06-16T04:25:00.816Z
Learning: In the Bifrost test account implementation, the user prefers to let Bifrost itself handle missing API key errors rather than adding early validation in the GetKeysForProvider method.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#81
File: tests/core-providers/scenarios/end_to_end_tool_calling.go:43-45
Timestamp: 2025-06-16T04:13:55.437Z
Learning: In the Bifrost codebase, errors returned from client methods like ChatCompletionRequest are of type BifrostError, not the standard error interface. For testing these errors, use require.Nilf instead of require.NoErrorf since BifrostError doesn't work with the standard error assertion methods.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#97
File: transports/Dockerfile:37-42
Timestamp: 2025-06-19T09:06:25.750Z
Learning: In Docker configurations for this project, plugin-specific environment variables (like MAXIM_LOG_REPO_ID) should not be included in the Dockerfile's ENV section. The architectural goal is to keep Docker images plugin-agnostic and externalize all plugin configuration to runtime via docker run -e flags, rather than baking plugin config into the image.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#83
File: core/providers/mistral.go:96-101
Timestamp: 2025-06-15T13:50:41.418Z
Learning: In the Bifrost project, when a provider doesn't support a specific operation (like text completion), the IsBifrostError flag should be set to false to mark it as a provider-level error rather than a Bifrost framework error. This is intentional design for unsupported operations.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#63
File: transports/bifrost-http/integrations/openai/types.go:264-285
Timestamp: 2025-06-10T12:58:45.501Z
Learning: In the Bifrost OpenAI integration, tool calls should be allowed on any message role (not just assistant messages) and the downstream provider should handle validation. Users passing tool calls to non-assistant messages is considered deliberate behavior that should be preserved.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#94
File: core/mcp.go:696-711
Timestamp: 2025-06-18T20:16:37.560Z
Learning: For the Bifrost MCP implementation, performance optimizations like caching tool discovery results should be deferred until after core functionality is complete. The author prefers to implement core features first and handle optimizations as follow-up work.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#55
File: core/providers/anthropic.go:483-494
Timestamp: 2025-06-04T10:04:30.181Z
Learning: In the Anthropic provider (core/providers/anthropic.go), parallel tool calls support including the DisableParallelToolUse flag will be implemented in later commits as it's a relatively new feature that's not commonly used yet. The development approach prioritizes core functionality first.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#63
File: transports/bifrost-http/integrations/openai/types.go:223-231
Timestamp: 2025-06-10T11:06:06.670Z
Learning: The OpenAI `name` field on messages cannot be preserved when converting to Bifrost format because the `schemas.BifrostMessage` struct in bifrost/core does not support a Name field. This is a known limitation of the Bifrost core schema design.
Learnt from: connyay
PR: maximhq/bifrost#92
File: core/providers/utils.go:60-64
Timestamp: 2025-06-17T14:04:21.104Z
Learning: The bifrost codebase uses string alias types (like `type ContextKey string`) for context keys consistently across multiple packages including plugins/maxim/main.go and transports/bifrost-http/tracking/plugin.go. This pattern should be maintained for consistency rather than switching to the canonical struct{} approach.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#81
File: tests/core-providers/openai_test.go:1-2
Timestamp: 2025-06-16T04:29:53.409Z
Learning: In the Bifrost project, the user prefers to use `package main` for test files in the tests/core-providers directory rather than more descriptive package names like `coreproviders_test`.
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[uncategorized] ~96-~96: Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ... That's it!, just 4 lines of code and you can now use Bifrost to make request...

(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

96-96: Comma needed to avoid run-on sentence

-**That's it!**, just _4 lines of code_ and you can now use Bifrost […]
+**That's it!**, just _4 lines of code_, and you can now use Bifrost […]
⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#84
File: transports/bifrost-http/main.go:2-2
Timestamp: 2025-06-15T16:05:13.489Z
Learning: For the Bifrost project, HTTP transport integration routers for new providers (like Mistral and Ollama) are implemented in separate PRs from the core provider support, following a focused PR strategy.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#54
File: core/providers/bedrock.go:241-252
Timestamp: 2025-06-04T09:07:20.867Z
Learning: In the Bifrost codebase, when working with AWS Bedrock provider authentication, the preference is to let AWS handle access key validation naturally rather than adding preemptive checks for empty/blank access keys. This allows AWS to provide its own authentication error messages which can be more informative than custom validation errors.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#85
File: core/providers/anthropic.go:150-156
Timestamp: 2025-06-15T16:07:53.140Z
Learning: In the Bifrost codebase, constructor functions are allowed to mutate input ProviderConfig objects in-place (e.g., setting default BaseURL values and trimming trailing slashes). This pattern is acceptable and doesn't need to be flagged as a code review issue.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#81
File: tests/core-providers/config/account.go:55-101
Timestamp: 2025-06-16T04:25:00.816Z
Learning: In the Bifrost test account implementation, the user prefers to let Bifrost itself handle missing API key errors rather than adding early validation in the GetKeysForProvider method.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#83
File: core/providers/mistral.go:168-170
Timestamp: 2025-06-15T14:24:49.882Z
Learning: In the Bifrost codebase, performance is prioritized over defensive copying for HTTP service operations. Specifically, shallow slice assignments in provider response handling are acceptable due to object pool reset patterns and JSON unmarshaling behavior that minimize practical data corruption risks.
Learnt from: Pratham-Mishra04
PR: maximhq/bifrost#63
File: transports/bifrost-http/integrations/openai/router.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-09T14:03:34.227Z
Learning: In the Bifrost HTTP transport layer (transports/bifrost-http/integrations/), request validation like checking for empty messages should be handled by the provider rather than at the transport layer. The transport layer should forward requests to Bifrost core/providers for validation.

Comment thread docs/core-package.md
Comment thread docs/core-package.md
Comment thread README.md
@akshaydeo akshaydeo merged commit 99670c2 into main Jun 27, 2025
2 checks passed
@akshaydeo akshaydeo deleted the 06-27-docs_main_readme_revamp branch August 31, 2025 17:30
akshaydeo added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2025
# Enhanced README with Visual Elements and Improved Documentation Structure

This PR adds visual elements and restructures the documentation to make it more user-friendly:

- Added a cover image to the README for better visual identity
- Simplified the quickstart section to focus on the HTTP transport (30-second setup)
- Removed the overview section as its content was redundant with other sections
- Created a dedicated `core-package.md` documentation file with comprehensive guidance on using Bifrost as a Go package
- Reorganized the "Getting Started" section to clearly distinguish between the two main usage patterns:
  1. As a Go package (core integration)
  2. As an HTTP API (transport layer)
- Added feature highlighting SDK support and seamless integration with existing Generative AI SDKs
- Included demo video for the package integration
- Improved formatting and navigation throughout the documentation

These changes make the documentation more accessible while maintaining all the essential information for users.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants