Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade tempy from 0.5.0 to 3.1.0 #4

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

maverick3312
Copy link
Owner

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade tempy from 0.5.0 to 3.1.0.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


Warning: This is a major version upgrade, and may be a breaking change.

  • The recommended version is 8 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 3 months ago, on 2023-07-10.
Release notes
Package name: tempy from tempy GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: tempy

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 28, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
node ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 28, 2023 11:19pm

@stackblitz
Copy link

stackblitz bot commented Sep 28, 2023

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants