Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.

Support the backwards compatibility features in MSC3952. #14958

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 3, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 8 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions changelog.d/14958.feature
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
Experimental support for [MSC3952](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3952): intentional mentions.
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions rust/benches/evaluator.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ fn bench_match_exact(b: &mut Bencher) {

let eval = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new(
flattened_keys,
false,
BTreeSet::new(),
false,
10,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ fn bench_match_word(b: &mut Bencher) {

let eval = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new(
flattened_keys,
false,
BTreeSet::new(),
false,
10,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -109,6 +111,7 @@ fn bench_match_word_miss(b: &mut Bencher) {

let eval = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new(
flattened_keys,
false,
BTreeSet::new(),
false,
10,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -147,6 +150,7 @@ fn bench_eval_message(b: &mut Bencher) {

let eval = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new(
flattened_keys,
false,
BTreeSet::new(),
false,
10,
Expand Down
19 changes: 19 additions & 0 deletions rust/src/push/evaluator.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ pub struct PushRuleEvaluator {
/// The "content.body", if any.
body: String,

/// True if the event has a mentions property and MSC3952 support is enabled.
has_mentions: bool,
/// The user mentions that were part of the message.
user_mentions: BTreeSet<String>,
/// True if the message is a room message.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -105,6 +107,7 @@ impl PushRuleEvaluator {
#[new]
pub fn py_new(
flattened_keys: BTreeMap<String, String>,
has_mentions: bool,
user_mentions: BTreeSet<String>,
room_mention: bool,
room_member_count: u64,
Expand All @@ -123,6 +126,7 @@ impl PushRuleEvaluator {
Ok(PushRuleEvaluator {
flattened_keys,
body,
has_mentions,
user_mentions,
room_mention,
room_member_count,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -155,6 +159,19 @@ impl PushRuleEvaluator {
}

let rule_id = &push_rule.rule_id().to_string();

// For backwards-compatibility the legacy mention rules are disabled
// if the event contains the 'm.mentions' property (and if the
// experimental feature is enabled, both of these are represented
// by the has_mentions flag).
if self.has_mentions
&& (rule_id == "global/override/.m.rule.contains_display_name"
|| rule_id == "global/content/.m.rule.contains_user_name"
|| rule_id == "global/override/.m.rule.roomnotif")
{
continue;
}

let extev_flag = &RoomVersionFeatures::ExtensibleEvents.as_str().to_string();
let supports_extensible_events = self.room_version_feature_flags.contains(extev_flag);
let safe_from_rver_condition = SAFE_EXTENSIBLE_EVENTS_RULE_IDS.contains(rule_id);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -441,6 +458,7 @@ fn push_rule_evaluator() {
flattened_keys.insert("content.body".to_string(), "foo bar bob hello".to_string());
let evaluator = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new(
flattened_keys,
false,
BTreeSet::new(),
false,
10,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -468,6 +486,7 @@ fn test_requires_room_version_supports_condition() {
let flags = vec![RoomVersionFeatures::ExtensibleEvents.as_str().to_string()];
let evaluator = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new(
flattened_keys,
false,
BTreeSet::new(),
false,
10,
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions stubs/synapse/synapse_rust/push.pyi
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ class PushRuleEvaluator:
def __init__(
self,
flattened_keys: Mapping[str, str],
has_mentions: bool,
user_mentions: Set[str],
room_mention: bool,
room_member_count: int,
Expand Down
9 changes: 8 additions & 1 deletion synapse/push/bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ def __init__(self, hs: "HomeServer"):
self.should_calculate_push_rules = self.hs.config.push.enable_push

self._related_event_match_enabled = self.hs.config.experimental.msc3664_enabled
self._intentional_mentions_enabled = (
self.hs.config.experimental.msc3952_intentional_mentions
)

self.room_push_rule_cache_metrics = register_cache(
"cache",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -364,9 +367,12 @@ async def _action_for_event_by_user(

# Pull out any user and room mentions.
mentions = event.content.get(EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS)
has_mentions = self._intentional_mentions_enabled and isinstance(mentions, dict)
user_mentions: Set[str] = set()
room_mention = False
if isinstance(mentions, dict):
if has_mentions:
# mypy seems to have lost the type even though it must be a dict here.
assert isinstance(mentions, dict)
clokep marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
# Remove out any non-string items and convert to a set.
user_mentions_raw = mentions.get("user_ids")
if isinstance(user_mentions_raw, list):
Expand All @@ -378,6 +384,7 @@ async def _action_for_event_by_user(

evaluator = PushRuleEvaluator(
_flatten_dict(event, room_version=event.room_version),
has_mentions,
user_mentions,
room_mention,
room_member_count,
Expand Down
191 changes: 140 additions & 51 deletions tests/push/test_bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.

from typing import Any
from typing import Any, Optional
from unittest.mock import patch

from parameterized import parameterized
Expand All @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
from synapse.rest import admin
from synapse.rest.client import login, register, room
from synapse.server import HomeServer
from synapse.types import create_requester
from synapse.types import JsonDict, create_requester
from synapse.util import Clock

from tests.test_utils import simple_async_mock
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -196,77 +196,144 @@ def test_action_for_event_by_user_disabled_by_config(self) -> None:
self.get_success(bulk_evaluator.action_for_events_by_user([(event, context)]))
bulk_evaluator._action_for_event_by_user.assert_not_called()

@override_config({"experimental_features": {"msc3952_intentional_mentions": True}})
def test_mentions(self) -> None:
"""Test the behavior of an event which includes invalid mentions."""
bulk_evaluator = BulkPushRuleEvaluator(self.hs)

sentinel = object()

def create_and_process(mentions: Any = sentinel) -> bool:
"""Returns true iff the `mentions` trigger an event push action."""
content = {}
if mentions is not sentinel:
content[EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS] = mentions

# Create a new message event which should cause a notification.
event, context = self.get_success(
self.event_creation_handler.create_event(
self.requester,
{
"type": "test",
"room_id": self.room_id,
"content": content,
"sender": f"@bob:{self.hs.hostname}",
},
)
def _create_and_process(
self, bulk_evaluator: BulkPushRuleEvaluator, content: Optional[JsonDict] = None
) -> bool:
"""Returns true iff the `mentions` trigger an event push action."""
# Create a new message event which should cause a notification.
event, context = self.get_success(
self.event_creation_handler.create_event(
self.requester,
{
"type": "test",
"room_id": self.room_id,
"content": content or {},
"sender": f"@bob:{self.hs.hostname}",
},
)
)

# Ensure no actions are generated!
self.get_success(
bulk_evaluator.action_for_events_by_user([(event, context)])
)
# Ensure no actions are generated!
clokep marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
self.get_success(bulk_evaluator.action_for_events_by_user([(event, context)]))

# If any actions are generated for this event, return true.
result = self.get_success(
self.hs.get_datastores().main.db_pool.simple_select_list(
table="event_push_actions_staging",
keyvalues={"event_id": event.event_id},
retcols=("*",),
desc="get_event_push_actions_staging",
)
# If any actions are generated for this event, return true.
result = self.get_success(
self.hs.get_datastores().main.db_pool.simple_select_list(
table="event_push_actions_staging",
keyvalues={"event_id": event.event_id},
retcols=("*",),
desc="get_event_push_actions_staging",
)
return len(result) > 0
)
return len(result) > 0

@override_config({"experimental_features": {"msc3952_intentional_mentions": True}})
def test_user_mentions(self) -> None:
"""Test the behavior of an event which includes invalid user mentions."""
bulk_evaluator = BulkPushRuleEvaluator(self.hs)

# Not including the mentions field should not notify.
self.assertFalse(create_and_process())
self.assertFalse(self._create_and_process(bulk_evaluator))
# An empty mentions field should not notify.
self.assertFalse(create_and_process({}))
self.assertFalse(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator, {EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {}}
)
)

# Non-dict mentions should be ignored.
mentions: Any
for mentions in (None, True, False, 1, "foo", []):
self.assertFalse(create_and_process(mentions))
self.assertFalse(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator, {EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: mentions}
)
)

# A non-list should be ignored.
for mentions in (None, True, False, 1, "foo", {}):
self.assertFalse(create_and_process({"user_ids": mentions}))
self.assertFalse(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator,
{EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {"user_ids": mentions}},
)
)

# The Matrix ID appearing anywhere in the list should notify.
self.assertTrue(create_and_process({"user_ids": [self.alice]}))
self.assertTrue(create_and_process({"user_ids": ["@another:test", self.alice]}))
self.assertTrue(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator,
{EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {"user_ids": [self.alice]}},
)
)
self.assertTrue(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator,
{
EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {
"user_ids": ["@another:test", self.alice]
}
},
)
)

# Duplicate user IDs should notify.
self.assertTrue(create_and_process({"user_ids": [self.alice, self.alice]}))
self.assertTrue(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator,
{
EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {
"user_ids": [self.alice, self.alice]
}
},
)
)

# Invalid entries in the list are ignored.
self.assertFalse(create_and_process({"user_ids": [None, True, False, {}, []]}))
self.assertFalse(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator,
{
EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {
"user_ids": [None, True, False, {}, []]
}
},
)
)
self.assertTrue(
create_and_process({"user_ids": [None, True, False, {}, [], self.alice]})
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator,
{
EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {
"user_ids": [None, True, False, {}, [], self.alice]
}
},
)
)

# The legacy push rule should not mention if the mentions field exists.
self.assertFalse(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator,
{
"body": self.alice,
"msgtype": "m.text",
EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {},
},
)
)

@override_config({"experimental_features": {"msc3952_intentional_mentions": True}})
def test_room_mentions(self) -> None:
"""Test the behavior of an event which includes invalid room mentions."""
bulk_evaluator = BulkPushRuleEvaluator(self.hs)

# Room mentions from those without power should not notify.
self.assertFalse(create_and_process({"room": True}))
self.assertFalse(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator, {EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {"room": True}}
)
)

# Room mentions from those with power should notify.
self.helper.send_state(
Expand All @@ -276,8 +343,30 @@ def create_and_process(mentions: Any = sentinel) -> bool:
self.token,
state_key="",
)
self.assertTrue(create_and_process({"room": True}))
self.assertTrue(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator, {EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {"room": True}}
)
)

# Invalid data should not notify.
mentions: Any
for mentions in (None, False, 1, "foo", [], {}):
self.assertFalse(create_and_process({"room": mentions}))
self.assertFalse(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator,
{EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {"room": mentions}},
)
)

# The legacy push rule should not mention if the mentions field exists.
self.assertFalse(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator,
{
"body": "@room",
"msgtype": "m.text",
EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {},
},
)
)
Loading