Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.

Support the backwards compatibility features in MSC3952. #14958

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 3, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions changelog.d/14958.feature
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
Experimental support for [MSC3952](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3952): intentional mentions.
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions rust/benches/evaluator.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ fn bench_match_exact(b: &mut Bencher) {

let eval = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new(
flattened_keys,
false,
BTreeSet::new(),
false,
10,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ fn bench_match_word(b: &mut Bencher) {

let eval = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new(
flattened_keys,
false,
BTreeSet::new(),
false,
10,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -109,6 +111,7 @@ fn bench_match_word_miss(b: &mut Bencher) {

let eval = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new(
flattened_keys,
false,
BTreeSet::new(),
false,
10,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -147,6 +150,7 @@ fn bench_eval_message(b: &mut Bencher) {

let eval = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new(
flattened_keys,
false,
BTreeSet::new(),
false,
10,
Expand Down
19 changes: 19 additions & 0 deletions rust/src/push/evaluator.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ pub struct PushRuleEvaluator {
/// The "content.body", if any.
body: String,

/// True if the event has a mentions property and MSC3952 support is enabled.
has_mentions: bool,
/// The user mentions that were part of the message.
user_mentions: BTreeSet<String>,
/// True if the message is a room message.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -105,6 +107,7 @@ impl PushRuleEvaluator {
#[new]
pub fn py_new(
flattened_keys: BTreeMap<String, String>,
has_mentions: bool,
user_mentions: BTreeSet<String>,
room_mention: bool,
room_member_count: u64,
Expand All @@ -123,6 +126,7 @@ impl PushRuleEvaluator {
Ok(PushRuleEvaluator {
flattened_keys,
body,
has_mentions,
user_mentions,
room_mention,
room_member_count,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -155,6 +159,19 @@ impl PushRuleEvaluator {
}

let rule_id = &push_rule.rule_id().to_string();

// For backwards-compatibility the legacy mention rules are disabled
// if the event contains the 'm.mentions' property (and if the
// experimental feature is enabled, both of these are represented
// by the has_mentions flag).
if self.has_mentions
&& (rule_id == "global/override/.m.rule.contains_display_name"
|| rule_id == "global/content/.m.rule.contains_user_name"
|| rule_id == "global/override/.m.rule.roomnotif")
{
continue;
}

let extev_flag = &RoomVersionFeatures::ExtensibleEvents.as_str().to_string();
let supports_extensible_events = self.room_version_feature_flags.contains(extev_flag);
let safe_from_rver_condition = SAFE_EXTENSIBLE_EVENTS_RULE_IDS.contains(rule_id);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -441,6 +458,7 @@ fn push_rule_evaluator() {
flattened_keys.insert("content.body".to_string(), "foo bar bob hello".to_string());
let evaluator = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new(
flattened_keys,
false,
BTreeSet::new(),
false,
10,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -468,6 +486,7 @@ fn test_requires_room_version_supports_condition() {
let flags = vec![RoomVersionFeatures::ExtensibleEvents.as_str().to_string()];
let evaluator = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new(
flattened_keys,
false,
BTreeSet::new(),
false,
10,
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions stubs/synapse/synapse_rust/push.pyi
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ class PushRuleEvaluator:
def __init__(
self,
flattened_keys: Mapping[str, str],
has_mentions: bool,
user_mentions: Set[str],
room_mention: bool,
room_member_count: int,
Expand Down
9 changes: 8 additions & 1 deletion synapse/push/bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ def __init__(self, hs: "HomeServer"):
self.should_calculate_push_rules = self.hs.config.push.enable_push

self._related_event_match_enabled = self.hs.config.experimental.msc3664_enabled
self._intentional_mentions_enabled = (
self.hs.config.experimental.msc3952_intentional_mentions
)

self.room_push_rule_cache_metrics = register_cache(
"cache",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -364,9 +367,12 @@ async def _action_for_event_by_user(

# Pull out any user and room mentions.
mentions = event.content.get(EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS)
has_mentions = self._intentional_mentions_enabled and isinstance(mentions, dict)
user_mentions: Set[str] = set()
room_mention = False
if isinstance(mentions, dict):
if has_mentions:
# mypy seems to have lost the type even though it must be a dict here.
assert isinstance(mentions, dict)
clokep marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
# Remove out any non-string items and convert to a set.
user_mentions_raw = mentions.get("user_ids")
if isinstance(user_mentions_raw, list):
Expand All @@ -378,6 +384,7 @@ async def _action_for_event_by_user(

evaluator = PushRuleEvaluator(
_flatten_dict(event, room_version=event.room_version),
has_mentions,
user_mentions,
room_mention,
room_member_count,
Expand Down
191 changes: 140 additions & 51 deletions tests/push/test_bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.

from typing import Any
from typing import Any, Optional
from unittest.mock import patch

from parameterized import parameterized
Expand All @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
from synapse.rest import admin
from synapse.rest.client import login, register, room
from synapse.server import HomeServer
from synapse.types import create_requester
from synapse.types import JsonDict, create_requester
from synapse.util import Clock

from tests.test_utils import simple_async_mock
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -196,77 +196,144 @@ def test_action_for_event_by_user_disabled_by_config(self) -> None:
self.get_success(bulk_evaluator.action_for_events_by_user([(event, context)]))
bulk_evaluator._action_for_event_by_user.assert_not_called()

@override_config({"experimental_features": {"msc3952_intentional_mentions": True}})
def test_mentions(self) -> None:
"""Test the behavior of an event which includes invalid mentions."""
bulk_evaluator = BulkPushRuleEvaluator(self.hs)

sentinel = object()

def create_and_process(mentions: Any = sentinel) -> bool:
"""Returns true iff the `mentions` trigger an event push action."""
content = {}
if mentions is not sentinel:
content[EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS] = mentions

# Create a new message event which should cause a notification.
event, context = self.get_success(
self.event_creation_handler.create_event(
self.requester,
{
"type": "test",
"room_id": self.room_id,
"content": content,
"sender": f"@bob:{self.hs.hostname}",
},
)
def _create_and_process(
self, bulk_evaluator: BulkPushRuleEvaluator, content: Optional[JsonDict] = None
) -> bool:
"""Returns true iff the `mentions` trigger an event push action."""
# Create a new message event which should cause a notification.
event, context = self.get_success(
self.event_creation_handler.create_event(
self.requester,
{
"type": "test",
"room_id": self.room_id,
"content": content or {},
"sender": f"@bob:{self.hs.hostname}",
},
)
)

# Ensure no actions are generated!
self.get_success(
bulk_evaluator.action_for_events_by_user([(event, context)])
)
# Execute the push rule machinery.
self.get_success(bulk_evaluator.action_for_events_by_user([(event, context)]))

# If any actions are generated for this event, return true.
result = self.get_success(
self.hs.get_datastores().main.db_pool.simple_select_list(
table="event_push_actions_staging",
keyvalues={"event_id": event.event_id},
retcols=("*",),
desc="get_event_push_actions_staging",
)
# If any actions are generated for this event, return true.
result = self.get_success(
self.hs.get_datastores().main.db_pool.simple_select_list(
table="event_push_actions_staging",
keyvalues={"event_id": event.event_id},
retcols=("*",),
desc="get_event_push_actions_staging",
)
return len(result) > 0
)
return len(result) > 0

@override_config({"experimental_features": {"msc3952_intentional_mentions": True}})
def test_user_mentions(self) -> None:
"""Test the behavior of an event which includes invalid user mentions."""
bulk_evaluator = BulkPushRuleEvaluator(self.hs)

# Not including the mentions field should not notify.
self.assertFalse(create_and_process())
self.assertFalse(self._create_and_process(bulk_evaluator))
# An empty mentions field should not notify.
self.assertFalse(create_and_process({}))
self.assertFalse(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator, {EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {}}
)
)

# Non-dict mentions should be ignored.
mentions: Any
for mentions in (None, True, False, 1, "foo", []):
self.assertFalse(create_and_process(mentions))
self.assertFalse(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator, {EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: mentions}
)
)

# A non-list should be ignored.
for mentions in (None, True, False, 1, "foo", {}):
self.assertFalse(create_and_process({"user_ids": mentions}))
self.assertFalse(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator,
{EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {"user_ids": mentions}},
)
)

# The Matrix ID appearing anywhere in the list should notify.
self.assertTrue(create_and_process({"user_ids": [self.alice]}))
self.assertTrue(create_and_process({"user_ids": ["@another:test", self.alice]}))
self.assertTrue(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator,
{EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {"user_ids": [self.alice]}},
)
)
self.assertTrue(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator,
{
EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {
"user_ids": ["@another:test", self.alice]
}
},
)
)

# Duplicate user IDs should notify.
self.assertTrue(create_and_process({"user_ids": [self.alice, self.alice]}))
self.assertTrue(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator,
{
EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {
"user_ids": [self.alice, self.alice]
}
},
)
)

# Invalid entries in the list are ignored.
self.assertFalse(create_and_process({"user_ids": [None, True, False, {}, []]}))
self.assertFalse(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator,
{
EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {
"user_ids": [None, True, False, {}, []]
}
},
)
)
self.assertTrue(
create_and_process({"user_ids": [None, True, False, {}, [], self.alice]})
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator,
{
EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {
"user_ids": [None, True, False, {}, [], self.alice]
}
},
)
)

# The legacy push rule should not mention if the mentions field exists.
self.assertFalse(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator,
{
"body": self.alice,
"msgtype": "m.text",
EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {},
},
)
)

@override_config({"experimental_features": {"msc3952_intentional_mentions": True}})
def test_room_mentions(self) -> None:
"""Test the behavior of an event which includes invalid room mentions."""
bulk_evaluator = BulkPushRuleEvaluator(self.hs)

# Room mentions from those without power should not notify.
self.assertFalse(create_and_process({"room": True}))
self.assertFalse(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator, {EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {"room": True}}
)
)

# Room mentions from those with power should notify.
self.helper.send_state(
Expand All @@ -276,8 +343,30 @@ def create_and_process(mentions: Any = sentinel) -> bool:
self.token,
state_key="",
)
self.assertTrue(create_and_process({"room": True}))
self.assertTrue(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator, {EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {"room": True}}
)
)

# Invalid data should not notify.
mentions: Any
for mentions in (None, False, 1, "foo", [], {}):
self.assertFalse(create_and_process({"room": mentions}))
self.assertFalse(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator,
{EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {"room": mentions}},
)
)

# The legacy push rule should not mention if the mentions field exists.
self.assertFalse(
self._create_and_process(
bulk_evaluator,
{
"body": "@room",
"msgtype": "m.text",
EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {},
},
)
)
Loading