Skip to content

Conversation

@marcusquinn
Copy link
Owner

Summary

Add documentation for README updates and changelog guidance to loop agents.

Changes

  • Add README update guidance to full-loop.md
  • Add changelog section to ralph-loop.md explaining conventional commits

- Add 'Documentation Updates' section to ralph-loop.md with README and
  conventional commit guidance
- Add 'Documentation & Changelog' section to full-loop.md with commit
  prefix table
- Update completion criteria to include README updates
- Add changelog.md to related workflows
- Clarify that changelog is auto-generated from conventional commits
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 11, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@marcusquinn has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 8 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 629e421 and cb18a2a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .agent/scripts/commands/full-loop.md
  • .agent/workflows/ralph-loop.md

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@marcusquinn marcusquinn merged commit 68436d4 into main Jan 11, 2026
17 of 21 checks passed
@marcusquinn marcusquinn deleted the chore/loop-agents-readme-changelog branch January 11, 2026 05:35
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the documentation for AI loop agents by integrating explicit guidelines for managing README.md updates and leveraging conventional commits for automated changelog generation. The changes aim to standardize documentation practices and ensure that release notes are consistently and automatically generated, improving the overall maintainability and clarity of the project.

Highlights

  • Updated AI Task Completion Criteria: The full-loop.md documentation now includes README.md updates and conventional commit usage as explicit criteria for AI task completion, ensuring comprehensive documentation and consistent changelog generation.
  • New Documentation & Changelog Section in full-loop.md: A dedicated section has been added to full-loop.md providing detailed guidance on when and how to update README.md files, along with a table explaining the impact of conventional commit prefixes on auto-generated changelogs.
  • Enhanced Documentation Guidance in ralph-loop.md: The ralph-loop.md file now features an expanded 'Documentation Updates' section, offering clear instructions on integrating README.md updates and conventional commit messages into task completion criteria for AI agents.
  • Clarified AI Autonomous Activities: The 'Task Development' phase in ralph-loop.md's summary table has been updated to explicitly list README.md updates as an AI autonomous activity, reinforcing the importance of documentation in automated workflows.
  • Consolidated Documentation Summary: A new 'Documentation in Loops' section has been introduced in ralph-loop.md to provide a concise overview of README.md and changelog best practices, including the proper use of conventional commit prefixes.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@github-actions
Copy link

🔍 Code Quality Report

�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status:
SonarCloud: 0 bugs, 0 vulnerabilities, 256 code smells

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity:
Sun Jan 11 05:35:33 UTC 2026: Code review monitoring started
Sun Jan 11 05:35:33 UTC 2026: SonarCloud - Bugs: 0, Vulnerabilities: 0, Code Smells: 256
Sun Jan 11 05:35:33 UTC 2026: Qlty - 0 issues found, auto-formatting applied
Sun Jan 11 05:35:35 UTC 2026: Codacy analysis completed with auto-fixes

📈 Current Quality Metrics

  • BUGS: 0
  • CODE SMELLS: 256
  • VULNERABILITIES: 0

Generated on: Sun Jan 11 05:36:13 UTC 2026


Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds valuable documentation regarding README updates and changelog guidance for loop agents. The changes are clear and well-structured. I've identified a minor inconsistency between the two updated files regarding the list of conventional commit prefixes. Additionally, both files reference a workflows/changelog.md file that doesn't seem to exist in the repository, which could lead to broken links for users. My review includes suggestions to address these points to improve the documentation's consistency and completeness.

| `refactor:` | Changed | `refactor: simplify auth middleware` |
| `chore:` | (excluded) | `chore: update dependencies` |

See `workflows/changelog.md` for format details.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This line, along with others in this PR (e.g., line 176 in this file, and lines 257 and 591 in .agent/workflows/ralph-loop.md), references a workflows/changelog.md file. This file doesn't appear to be included in this pull request or the repository context provided. To prevent broken links and ensure users can find the detailed information, could you please add this file? If it's intended for a future PR, it might be helpful to clarify that.

Comment on lines +586 to +589
- `feat:` → Added section
- `fix:` → Fixed section
- `docs:` → Changed section
- `chore:` → Excluded from changelog

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This list of conventional commit prefixes is inconsistent with the more detailed table provided in .agent/scripts/commands/full-loop.md. The other file also includes perf: and refactor:, which are both mapped to the "Changed" section. For consistency across the documentation, it would be beneficial to include them here as well.

Suggested change
- `feat:` → Added section
- `fix:` → Fixed section
- `docs:` → Changed section
- `chore:` → Excluded from changelog
- `feat:` → Added section
- `fix:` → Fixed section
- `docs:` → Changed section
- `perf:` → Changed section
- `refactor:` → Changed section
- `chore:` → Excluded from changelog

marcusquinn added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2026
All 13 unmerged branches processed:
- PRs merged: #44, #46, #48, #51
- PRs closed (already in main): #45, #47, #49, #50
- Branches deleted (superseded): 5 feature branches

All remote branches cleaned up. t059 marked complete.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant