chore: implement agent-review improvements by marcusquinn · Pull Request #46 · marcusquinn/aidevops

marcusquinn · 2026-01-11T05:28:48Z

Summary

Improvements to agent-review.md based on feedback and best practices.

Changes

Update generate-opencode-commands.sh with additional commands
Enhance ralph-loop.md workflow documentation
Improve agent review process guidance

1. Add auto-discovery for commands in scripts/commands/*.md - Prevents needing to manually add new commands to generator - Skips SKILL.md and already-defined commands 2. Document multi-worktree awareness in ralph-loop.md - status --all to check all worktrees - Parallel loop warnings - Integration with worktree-sessions.sh 3. Add /code-simplifier to AGENTS.md slash commands list

coderabbitai · 2026-01-11T05:28:53Z

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@marcusquinn has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 26 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a361dc6 and cdfdf16.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

.agent/AGENTS.md
.agent/scripts/generate-opencode-commands.sh
.agent/workflows/ralph-loop.md

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

gemini-code-assist · 2026-01-11T05:29:00Z

Summary of Changes

Hello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the agent review system by introducing a new command, automating the command generation process, and significantly improving the documentation for the Ralph loop workflow, especially regarding its behavior and management in multi-worktree Git environments.

Highlights

New Slash Command: The /code-simplifier slash command has been added to the agent's capabilities, expanding the available tools for code manipulation.
Automated Command Discovery: The generate-opencode-commands.sh script now includes an auto-discovery mechanism for agent commands, allowing new commands in the scripts/commands directory to be registered automatically without manual script updates.
Enhanced Ralph Loop Documentation: The ralph-loop.md documentation has been significantly updated to include 'Multi-Worktree Awareness', providing detailed guidance on managing and monitoring Ralph loop sessions across multiple Git worktrees, including parallel loop warnings and integration with worktree-sessions.sh.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	`/gemini review`	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	`/gemini summary`	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	`/gemini help`	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

sonarqubecloud · 2026-01-11T05:29:32Z

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

github-actions · 2026-01-11T05:29:54Z

🔍 Code Quality Report

�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status:
SonarCloud: 0 bugs, 0 vulnerabilities, 256 code smells

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity:
Sun Jan 11 05:29:14 UTC 2026: Code review monitoring started
Sun Jan 11 05:29:14 UTC 2026: SonarCloud - Bugs: 0, Vulnerabilities: 0, Code Smells: 256
Sun Jan 11 05:29:14 UTC 2026: Qlty - 0 issues found, auto-formatting applied
Sun Jan 11 05:29:16 UTC 2026: Codacy analysis completed with auto-fixes

📈 Current Quality Metrics

BUGS: 0
CODE SMELLS: 256
VULNERABILITIES: 0

Generated on: Sun Jan 11 05:29:53 UTC 2026

Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring

gemini-code-assist

Code Review

This pull request introduces several improvements, including auto-discovery of agent commands, and enhanced documentation for workflows. My review focuses on improving the robustness of the new shell script logic. I've suggested a change in generate-opencode-commands.sh to handle potential spaces in file paths correctly, making the script more reliable.

gemini-code-assist · 2026-01-11T05:30:17Z

.agent/scripts/generate-opencode-commands.sh

+    for cmd_file in "$COMMANDS_DIR"/*.md; do
+        [[ -f "$cmd_file" ]] || continue
+
+        cmd_name=$(basename "$cmd_file" .md)
+
+        # Skip SKILL.md (not a command)
+        [[ "$cmd_name" == "SKILL" ]] && continue
+
+        # Skip if already manually defined (avoid duplicates)
+        if [[ -f "$OPENCODE_COMMAND_DIR/$cmd_name.md" ]]; then
+            continue
+        fi
+
+        # Copy command file directly (it already has proper frontmatter)
+        cp "$cmd_file" "$OPENCODE_COMMAND_DIR/$cmd_name.md"
+        ((command_count++))
+        echo -e "  ${GREEN}✓${NC} Auto-discovered /$cmd_name command"
+    done


The for loop on line 1537 uses a glob pattern "$COMMANDS_DIR"/*.md that may not work as expected if $COMMANDS_DIR contains spaces. While $HOME paths usually don't have spaces, writing shell scripts to be robust against such cases is a good practice.

A more robust way to iterate through the files is to glob all items in the directory and then filter for markdown files within the loop. This handles paths with spaces correctly.

Suggested change

for cmd_file in "$COMMANDS_DIR"/*.md; do

[[ -f "$cmd_file" ]] || continue

cmd_name=$(basename "$cmd_file" .md)

# Skip SKILL.md (not a command)

[[ "$cmd_name" == "SKILL" ]] && continue

# Skip if already manually defined (avoid duplicates)

if [[ -f "$OPENCODE_COMMAND_DIR/$cmd_name.md" ]]; then

continue

fi

# Copy command file directly (it already has proper frontmatter)

cp "$cmd_file" "$OPENCODE_COMMAND_DIR/$cmd_name.md"

((command_count++))

echo -e " ${GREEN}✓${NC} Auto-discovered /$cmd_name command"

done

for cmd_file in "$COMMANDS_DIR"/*; do

[[ -f "$cmd_file" ]] || continue

[[ "$cmd_file" != *.md ]] && continue

cmd_name=$(basename "$cmd_file" .md)

# Skip SKILL.md (not a command)

[[ "$cmd_name" == "SKILL" ]] && continue

# Skip if already manually defined (avoid duplicates)

if [[ -f "$OPENCODE_COMMAND_DIR/$cmd_name.md" ]]; then

continue

fi

# Copy command file directly (it already has proper frontmatter)

cp "$cmd_file" "$OPENCODE_COMMAND_DIR/$cmd_name.md"

((command_count++))

echo -e " ${GREEN}✓${NC} Auto-discovered /$cmd_name command"

done

Processed: - PR #44 (bugfix/sonarcloud-default-cases): Merged - PR #45 (chore/add-missing-opencode-commands): Closed (in main via #46) - PR #46 (chore/agent-review-improvements): Merged - PR #47 (chore/agents-md-progressive-disclosure): Closed (in main) Remaining: 9 branches (4 chore, 5 feature)

* docs: add branch inventory and cleanup task (t059) - Create todo/BRANCH-INVENTORY.md documenting 13 unmerged branches - All branches pushed to remote for preservation - Add t059 task for reviewing and merging branches - Prune stale worktree references - Delete local branches (safely on remote) Cleanup summary: - 5 merged branches deleted (local + remote) - 4 local-only branches pushed to remote - 12 local branches deleted (all on remote) - 1 stale worktree reference pruned Remaining work documented for future sessions. * docs: update branch inventory after processing branches 1-4 Processed: - PR #44 (bugfix/sonarcloud-default-cases): Merged - PR #45 (chore/add-missing-opencode-commands): Closed (in main via #46) - PR #46 (chore/agent-review-improvements): Merged - PR #47 (chore/agents-md-progressive-disclosure): Closed (in main) Remaining: 9 branches (4 chore, 5 feature) * docs: update t059 progress after processing branches 1-4

augmentcode · 2026-01-11T05:33:40Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Improves agent-review-related tooling/docs and reduces manual upkeep for OpenCode command registration.

Changes:

Adds `/code-simplifier` to the documented slash-command list.
Extends `generate-opencode-commands.sh` to auto-discover command markdown files from `~/.aidevops/agents/scripts/commands` and copy them into OpenCode’s command directory.
Enhances `workflows/ralph-loop.md` with multi-worktree guidance, parallel-loop warnings, and `worktree-sessions.sh` integration notes.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. 1 suggestions posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

augmentcode · 2026-01-11T05:33:41Z

.agent/scripts/generate-opencode-commands.sh

+        [[ "$cmd_name" == "SKILL" ]] && continue
+
+        # Skip if already manually defined (avoid duplicates)
+        if [[ -f "$OPENCODE_COMMAND_DIR/$cmd_name.md" ]]; then


Because this block skips when "$OPENCODE_COMMAND_DIR/$cmd_name.md" already exists, auto-discovered commands won’t refresh on subsequent runs (only first-time creation), which can leave OpenCode with stale command definitions. Also, the header comment mentions .agent/scripts/commands but COMMANDS_DIR points at ~/.aidevops/agents/scripts/commands, which may confuse future maintainers.

_{🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

All 13 unmerged branches processed: - PRs merged: #44, #46, #48, #51 - PRs closed (already in main): #45, #47, #49, #50 - Branches deleted (superseded): 5 feature branches All remote branches cleaned up. t059 marked complete.

marcusquinn merged commit 95675bf into main Jan 11, 2026
21 of 25 checks passed

marcusquinn deleted the chore/agent-review-improvements branch January 11, 2026 05:29

marcusquinn mentioned this pull request Jan 11, 2026

chore: add missing OpenCode commands to generator #45

Closed

gemini-code-assist bot reviewed Jan 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

augmentcode bot reviewed Jan 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

chore: implement agent-review improvements#46

chore: implement agent-review improvements#46
marcusquinn merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/agent-review-improvements

marcusquinn commented Jan 11, 2026

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 11, 2026

Rate limit exceeded

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot commented Jan 11, 2026

Uh oh!

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 11, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 11, 2026

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot Jan 11, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Jan 11, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot Jan 11, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Conversation

marcusquinn commented Jan 11, 2026

Summary

Changes

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 11, 2026

Rate limit exceeded

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot commented Jan 11, 2026

Summary of Changes

Highlights

Footnotes

Uh oh!

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 11, 2026

Quality Gate passed

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 11, 2026

🔍 Code Quality Report

📈 Current Quality Metrics

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Code Review

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot Jan 11, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Jan 11, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot Jan 11, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant