feat: add AI bot review verification to pr-loop and full-loop workflows (t129) #394
Conversation
…ws (t129) AI code review bots (Gemini, CodeRabbit, Copilot) can provide incorrect suggestions. Add verification steps before acting on CHANGES_REQUESTED: - pr-loop.md: verification workflow with 4-step process - full-loop.md: update OpenProse example with evaluation step - quality-loop-helper.sh: warning message in CHANGES_REQUESTED handler - build.txt: AI Suggestion Verification rule - AGENTS.md: Bot Reviewer Feedback guidance section
Summary of ChangesHello @alex-solovyev, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the robustness of automated development workflows by introducing a critical verification layer for feedback received from AI code review bots. The primary goal is to mitigate risks associated with AI 'hallucinations' by ensuring that all bot-generated suggestions are fact-checked against reliable sources before implementation. This change aims to improve the reliability and correctness of code changes driven by AI feedback, thereby streamlining the development process while maintaining code quality. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Fri Feb 6 17:02:23 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
WalkthroughThis PR inserts AI-reviewer verification guidance across agent docs and scripts, adding policy text and expanded session prompts that instruct verifying AI suggestions against runtime, docs, and project conventions; changes are informational only and do not modify control flow or exported interfaces. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a crucial verification step for feedback from AI code review bots across several workflows. The changes include updates to documentation, AI prompts, and shell scripts to warn users and agents about the possibility of AI hallucinations and to enforce a verification process. The implementation is solid and the documentation is clear. I have a couple of minor suggestions to improve the readability of a warning message and a documentation snippet.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Fri Feb 6 17:07:45 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In @.agent/scripts/commands/pr-loop.md:
- Around line 57-66: Replace the "AI Bot Review Verification" block (currently
lines 57-66 in .agent/scripts/commands/pr-loop.md) with a single concise pointer
to the authoritative guidance in .agent/AGENTS.md:261; specifically, remove the
duplicated verification steps and replace them with one sentence such as "For
handling AI code reviewer feedback, see Bot Reviewer Feedback guidance in
.agent/AGENTS.md:261." Ensure the new line references AGENTS.md:261 exactly and
preserves surrounding headings/formatting in pr-loop.md.
…(t147.7) Addressed 5 valid issues: - Remove trailing blank lines in content.md - Remove duplicate list item in aidevops-plugin.md - Remove dead setup_oh_my_opencode stub (no callers) - Add mkdir -p before touch in add_local_bin_to_path (fish dir) - Add fish config to alias duplicate detection in setup_aliases Already fixed (6 threads): augment return 0, context7 old refs, pointer file count, parse_args return, mutual exclusion guard, non-interactive check_requirements Dismissed (6 threads): Intel Homebrew path (code removed), Bun rc (code removed), lowercase-only y (intentional UX), dir check -e vs -f (unrealistic edge case), shorten warning (intentional verbosity), pr-loop dedup (maintainer dismissed)
…(t147.7) Addressed 5 valid issues: - Remove trailing blank lines in content.md - Remove duplicate list item in aidevops-plugin.md - Remove dead setup_oh_my_opencode stub (no callers) - Add mkdir -p before touch in add_local_bin_to_path (fish dir) - Add fish config to alias duplicate detection in setup_aliases Already fixed (6 threads): augment return 0, context7 old refs, pointer file count, parse_args return, mutual exclusion guard, non-interactive check_requirements Dismissed (6 threads): Intel Homebrew path (code removed), Bun rc (code removed), lowercase-only y (intentional UX), dir check -e vs -f (unrealistic edge case), shorten warning (intentional verbosity), pr-loop dedup (maintainer dismissed)
…(t147.7) (#475) Addressed 5 valid issues: - Remove trailing blank lines in content.md - Remove duplicate list item in aidevops-plugin.md - Remove dead setup_oh_my_opencode stub (no callers) - Add mkdir -p before touch in add_local_bin_to_path (fish dir) - Add fish config to alias duplicate detection in setup_aliases Already fixed (6 threads): augment return 0, context7 old refs, pointer file count, parse_args return, mutual exclusion guard, non-interactive check_requirements Dismissed (6 threads): Intel Homebrew path (code removed), Bun rc (code removed), lowercase-only y (intentional UX), dir check -e vs -f (unrealistic edge case), shorten warning (intentional verbosity), pr-loop dedup (maintainer dismissed)
* fix: triage 17 PR review threads across PRs #418,#413,#412,#399,#394 (t147.7) Addressed 5 valid issues: - Remove trailing blank lines in content.md - Remove duplicate list item in aidevops-plugin.md - Remove dead setup_oh_my_opencode stub (no callers) - Add mkdir -p before touch in add_local_bin_to_path (fish dir) - Add fish config to alias duplicate detection in setup_aliases Already fixed (6 threads): augment return 0, context7 old refs, pointer file count, parse_args return, mutual exclusion guard, non-interactive check_requirements Dismissed (6 threads): Intel Homebrew path (code removed), Bun rc (code removed), lowercase-only y (intentional UX), dir check -e vs -f (unrealistic edge case), shorten warning (intentional verbosity), pr-loop dedup (maintainer dismissed) * chore: mark t147 complete - all 50 review threads resolved across 11 PRs (GH#438)
2 participants
Summary
Changes
pr-loop.mdfull-loop.mdquality-loop-helper.shbuild.txtAGENTS.mdTask
Closes t129 from TODO.md
Summary by CodeRabbit