chore: handled the error validation in updating the project state #6467
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apiserver/plane/app/views/state/base.py (1)
67-72: Enhance the duplicate state error message.The current error message could be more specific about the uniqueness scope. Consider clarifying that state names must be unique within a project:
- {"name": "The state name is already taken"}, + {"name": "A state with this name already exists in this project"},
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apiserver/plane/app/views/state/base.py(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: lint-apiserver
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apiserver/plane/app/views/state/base.py (1)
56-56: Verify if GUEST role should have state update permissions.The current implementation allows GUEST users to update states. Consider if this aligns with your access control requirements, as guests typically have read-only access.
✅ Verification successful
GUEST role permission for state updates is appropriate
The current permission setup aligns with the application's design where:
- Critical state operations (create, delete, mark default) are restricted to ADMIN
- Non-critical updates are allowed for all roles including GUEST
- This follows the same pattern as other endpoints where GUEST can interact with existing resources
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check other endpoints' permissions to verify consistency rg "allow_permission.*GUEST.*state" -A 5Length of output: 42
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all permission decorators in state-related files echo "=== State-related permissions ===" rg "@allow_permission" apiserver/plane/app/views/state/ # Search for GUEST role usage in views echo -e "\n=== GUEST role usage in views ===" rg "ROLE.GUEST" apiserver/plane/app/views/ -B 2 -A 2 # Check the base view file for state echo -e "\n=== Base state view content ===" cat apiserver/plane/app/views/state/base.pyLength of output: 37860
Description
The error validation for duplicate state names has been addressed.
Type of Change
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Access Control