Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WEB-2885] fix: retain issue description when creating an issue copy #6243

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

prateekshourya29
Copy link
Member

@prateekshourya29 prateekshourya29 commented Dec 20, 2024

Description

Ensure the description is included when copying an issue, even if the source issue isn't opened beforehand.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Improvement (change that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Code refactoring
  • Performance improvements
  • Documentation update

Screenshots and Media

Screen.Recording.2024-12-20.at.1.39.23.PM.mov

References

WEB-2885

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced issue modal to fetch details based on multiple identifiers when opened.
    • Improved handling of issue descriptions based on available data.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Refined logic for state management in the issue modal to ensure accurate data retrieval.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the CreateUpdateIssueModalBase component in base.tsx, focusing on enhancing the issue detail fetching mechanism. The changes update the useEffect hook's dependency array to include data?.sourceIssueId, allowing more flexible issue data retrieval. The fetchIssueDetail function now handles different issue identifiers more robustly, setting descriptions based on available data and improving the component's state management when the modal is opened or closed.

Changes

File Change Summary
web/core/components/issues/issue-modal/base.tsx - Updated useEffect dependency array to include data?.sourceIssueId
- Modified fetchIssueDetail function to handle different issue identifiers
- Improved description state management

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

🐛bug, 🌐frontend

Suggested reviewers

  • SatishGandham
  • sriramveeraghanta
  • rahulramesha

Poem

🐰 In the realm of issues, modal's might,
Code hops and leaps with newfound light,
Source ID dances, description takes flight,
Flexibility blooms, debugging's delight!
A rabbit's code, precise and bright 🔍


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
web/core/components/issues/issue-modal/base.tsx (1)

94-96: Consider adding a comment explaining the sourceIssueId usage.

To improve code maintainability, consider adding a comment explaining that sourceIssueId is used for retaining the description when copying issues.

+  // When copying an issue, fetch description from sourceIssueId if available
   if (isOpen) fetchIssueDetail(data?.id ?? data?.sourceIssueId);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c10b875 and 5f507f5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • web/core/components/issues/issue-modal/base.tsx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
web/core/components/issues/issue-modal/base.tsx (2)

95-95: LGTM! This change correctly implements issue description retention.

The modification to use both data?.id and data?.sourceIssueId ensures that the issue description is properly fetched when creating a copy of an existing issue.


119-119: Verify the useEffect dependency array update.

The addition of data?.sourceIssueId to the dependency array is correct and necessary to ensure the effect reruns when copying issues. However, let's verify that this doesn't cause any unintended re-renders in the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

The useEffect dependency array update is correct and safe

The addition of data?.sourceIssueId to the dependency array is justified based on the codebase analysis:

  • It's used within the effect to fetch issue details: fetchIssueDetail(data?.id ?? data?.sourceIssueId)
  • sourceIssueId is only used for copying issues and is properly cleaned up in form submission
  • The type definition confirms it's a temporary property used only for cloning
  • No other components have effects dependent on this property, preventing cascade re-renders
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential performance impact of the dependency array change

# Look for other useEffect hooks that might be affected by sourceIssueId changes
rg -U "useEffect.*sourceIssueId.*\}" --type ts --type tsx

# Look for components that might re-render due to sourceIssueId prop changes
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $interface {
  $$$
  sourceIssueId?: $_
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 168


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential performance impact of the dependency array change

# Look for other useEffect hooks that might be affected by sourceIssueId changes
rg -U "useEffect.*sourceIssueId.*\}" 

# Look for the usage context of sourceIssueId in the component
rg -B 5 -A 5 "sourceIssueId" web/core/components/issues/issue-modal/base.tsx

# Check for other components using sourceIssueId
rg "sourceIssueId" --type typescript --type javascriptreact --type typescriptreact

Length of output: 1615


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for sourceIssueId usage in all files
rg "sourceIssueId"

# Check the component's effect implementation
rg -B 10 -A 10 "useEffect.*fetchIssueDetail" web/core/components/issues/issue-modal/base.tsx

# Look for fetchIssueDetail implementation
rg -B 5 -A 5 "fetchIssueDetail.*=" web/core/components/issues/issue-modal/base.tsx

Length of output: 2542

@gurusainath gurusainath self-requested a review December 20, 2024 08:25
@pushya22 pushya22 merged commit e6bf57a into preview Dec 20, 2024
13 of 14 checks passed
@pushya22 pushya22 deleted the fix/make-a-copy branch December 20, 2024 08:47
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 9, 2025
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants