[DAG] Add baseline test coverage for #161036#168278
Merged
Conversation
Baseline tests from llvm#161651 that were reverted in llvm#167854 Still missing test coverage for the ffmpeg regression failures
Member
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86 @llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64 Author: Simon Pilgrim (RKSimon) ChangesBaseline tests from #161651 that were reverted in #167854 Still missing test coverage for the ffmpeg regression failures Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168278.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/umin-sub-to-usubo-select-combine.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/umin-sub-to-usubo-select-combine.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..d5f516fb3aa27
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/umin-sub-to-usubo-select-combine.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 6
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=aarch64 | FileCheck %s
+
+; GitHub issue #161036
+
+; Positive test : umin(sub(a,b),a) with scalar types should be folded
+define i64 @underflow_compare_fold_i64(i64 %a, i64 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: underflow_compare_fold_i64:
+; CHECK: // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: sub x8, x0, x1
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmp x8, x0
+; CHECK-NEXT: csel x0, x8, x0, lo
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+ %sub = sub i64 %a, %b
+ %cond = tail call i64 @llvm.umin.i64(i64 %sub, i64 %a)
+ ret i64 %cond
+}
+
+; Positive test : umin(a,sub(a,b)) with scalar types should be folded
+define i64 @underflow_compare_fold_i64_commute(i64 %a, i64 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: underflow_compare_fold_i64_commute:
+; CHECK: // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: sub x8, x0, x1
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmp x0, x8
+; CHECK-NEXT: csel x0, x0, x8, lo
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+ %sub = sub i64 %a, %b
+ %cond = tail call i64 @llvm.umin.i64(i64 %a, i64 %sub)
+ ret i64 %cond
+}
+
+; Positive test : multi-use is OK since the sub instruction still runs once
+define i64 @underflow_compare_fold_i64_multi_use(i64 %a, i64 %b, ptr addrspace(1) %ptr) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: underflow_compare_fold_i64_multi_use:
+; CHECK: // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: sub x8, x0, x1
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmp x8, x0
+; CHECK-NEXT: str x8, [x2]
+; CHECK-NEXT: csel x0, x8, x0, lo
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+ %sub = sub i64 %a, %b
+ store i64 %sub, ptr addrspace(1) %ptr
+ %cond = call i64 @llvm.umin.i64(i64 %sub, i64 %a)
+ ret i64 %cond
+}
+
+; Positive test : i32
+define i32 @underflow_compare_fold_i32(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: underflow_compare_fold_i32:
+; CHECK: // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: sub w8, w0, w1
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmp w8, w0
+; CHECK-NEXT: csel w0, w8, w0, lo
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+ %sub = sub i32 %a, %b
+ %cond = tail call i32 @llvm.umin.i32(i32 %sub, i32 %a)
+ ret i32 %cond
+}
+
+; Positive test : i32
+define i32 @underflow_compare_fold_i32_commute(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: underflow_compare_fold_i32_commute:
+; CHECK: // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: sub w8, w0, w1
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmp w0, w8
+; CHECK-NEXT: csel w0, w0, w8, lo
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+ %sub = sub i32 %a, %b
+ %cond = tail call i32 @llvm.umin.i32(i32 %a, i32 %sub)
+ ret i32 %cond
+}
+
+; Positive test : i32
+define i32 @underflow_compare_fold_i32_multi_use(i32 %a, i32 %b, ptr addrspace(1) %ptr) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: underflow_compare_fold_i32_multi_use:
+; CHECK: // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: sub w8, w0, w1
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmp w8, w0
+; CHECK-NEXT: str w8, [x2]
+; CHECK-NEXT: csel w0, w8, w0, lo
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+ %sub = sub i32 %a, %b
+ store i32 %sub, ptr addrspace(1) %ptr
+ %cond = call i32 @llvm.umin.i32(i32 %sub, i32 %a)
+ ret i32 %cond
+}
+
+; Negative test : i16
+define i16 @underflow_compare_fold_i16(i16 %a, i16 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: underflow_compare_fold_i16:
+; CHECK: // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: sub w8, w0, w1
+; CHECK-NEXT: and w9, w0, #0xffff
+; CHECK-NEXT: and w8, w8, #0xffff
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmp w8, w9
+; CHECK-NEXT: csel w0, w8, w9, lo
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+ %sub = sub i16 %a, %b
+ %cond = tail call i16 @llvm.umin.i16(i16 %sub, i16 %a)
+ ret i16 %cond
+}
+
+; Negative test : i16
+define i16 @underflow_compare_fold_i16_commute(i16 %a, i16 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: underflow_compare_fold_i16_commute:
+; CHECK: // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: sub w8, w0, w1
+; CHECK-NEXT: and w9, w0, #0xffff
+; CHECK-NEXT: and w8, w8, #0xffff
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmp w9, w8
+; CHECK-NEXT: csel w0, w9, w8, lo
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+ %sub = sub i16 %a, %b
+ %cond = tail call i16 @llvm.umin.i16(i16 %a, i16 %sub)
+ ret i16 %cond
+}
+
+; Negative test : i16
+define i16 @underflow_compare_fold_i16_multi_use(i16 %a, i16 %b, ptr addrspace(1) %ptr) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: underflow_compare_fold_i16_multi_use:
+; CHECK: // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: sub w8, w0, w1
+; CHECK-NEXT: and w9, w0, #0xffff
+; CHECK-NEXT: and w10, w8, #0xffff
+; CHECK-NEXT: strh w8, [x2]
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmp w10, w9
+; CHECK-NEXT: csel w0, w10, w9, lo
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+ %sub = sub i16 %a, %b
+ store i16 %sub, ptr addrspace(1) %ptr
+ %cond = call i16 @llvm.umin.i16(i16 %sub, i16 %a)
+ ret i16 %cond
+}
+
+; Negative test, vector types : umin(sub(a,b),a) but with vectors
+define <16 x i8> @underflow_compare_dontfold_vectors(<16 x i8> %a, <16 x i8> %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: underflow_compare_dontfold_vectors:
+; CHECK: // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: sub v1.16b, v0.16b, v1.16b
+; CHECK-NEXT: umin v0.16b, v1.16b, v0.16b
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+ %sub = sub <16 x i8> %a, %b
+ %cond = tail call <16 x i8> @llvm.umin.v16i8(<16 x i8> %sub, <16 x i8> %a)
+ ret <16 x i8> %cond
+}
+
+; Negative test, pattern mismatch : umin(add(a,b),a)
+define i64 @umin_add(i64 %a, i64 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: umin_add:
+; CHECK: // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: add x8, x0, x1
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmp x8, x0
+; CHECK-NEXT: csel x0, x8, x0, lo
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+ %add = add i64 %a, %b
+ %cond = tail call i64 @llvm.umin.i64(i64 %add, i64 %a)
+ ret i64 %cond
+}
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/umin-sub-to-usubo-select-combine.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/umin-sub-to-usubo-select-combine.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..6739be52d47f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/umin-sub-to-usubo-select-combine.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 6
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64 | FileCheck %s
+
+; GitHub issue #161036
+
+; Positive test : umin(sub(a,b),a) with scalar types should be folded
+define i64 @underflow_compare_fold_i64(i64 %a, i64 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: underflow_compare_fold_i64:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: movq %rdi, %rax
+; CHECK-NEXT: subq %rsi, %rax
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmpq %rdi, %rax
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmovaeq %rdi, %rax
+; CHECK-NEXT: retq
+ %sub = sub i64 %a, %b
+ %cond = tail call i64 @llvm.umin.i64(i64 %sub, i64 %a)
+ ret i64 %cond
+}
+
+; Positive test : umin(a,sub(a,b)) with scalar types should be folded
+define i64 @underflow_compare_fold_i64_commute(i64 %a, i64 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: underflow_compare_fold_i64_commute:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: movq %rdi, %rax
+; CHECK-NEXT: subq %rsi, %rax
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmpq %rax, %rdi
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmovbq %rdi, %rax
+; CHECK-NEXT: retq
+ %sub = sub i64 %a, %b
+ %cond = tail call i64 @llvm.umin.i64(i64 %a, i64 %sub)
+ ret i64 %cond
+}
+
+; Positive test : multi-use is OK since the sub instruction still runs once
+define i64 @underflow_compare_fold_i64_multi_use(i64 %a, i64 %b, ptr addrspace(1) %ptr) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: underflow_compare_fold_i64_multi_use:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: movq %rdi, %rax
+; CHECK-NEXT: subq %rsi, %rax
+; CHECK-NEXT: movq %rax, (%rdx)
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmpq %rdi, %rax
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmovaeq %rdi, %rax
+; CHECK-NEXT: retq
+ %sub = sub i64 %a, %b
+ store i64 %sub, ptr addrspace(1) %ptr
+ %cond = call i64 @llvm.umin.i64(i64 %sub, i64 %a)
+ ret i64 %cond
+}
+
+; Positive test : i32
+define i32 @underflow_compare_fold_i32(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: underflow_compare_fold_i32:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: movl %edi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: subl %esi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmpl %edi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmovael %edi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: retq
+ %sub = sub i32 %a, %b
+ %cond = tail call i32 @llvm.umin.i32(i32 %sub, i32 %a)
+ ret i32 %cond
+}
+
+; Positive test : i32
+define i32 @underflow_compare_fold_i32_commute(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: underflow_compare_fold_i32_commute:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: movl %edi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: subl %esi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmpl %eax, %edi
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmovbl %edi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: retq
+ %sub = sub i32 %a, %b
+ %cond = tail call i32 @llvm.umin.i32(i32 %a, i32 %sub)
+ ret i32 %cond
+}
+
+; Positive test : i32
+define i32 @underflow_compare_fold_i32_multi_use(i32 %a, i32 %b, ptr addrspace(1) %ptr) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: underflow_compare_fold_i32_multi_use:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: movl %edi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: subl %esi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: movl %eax, (%rdx)
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmpl %edi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmovael %edi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: retq
+ %sub = sub i32 %a, %b
+ store i32 %sub, ptr addrspace(1) %ptr
+ %cond = call i32 @llvm.umin.i32(i32 %sub, i32 %a)
+ ret i32 %cond
+}
+
+; Positive test : i16
+define i16 @underflow_compare_fold_i16(i16 %a, i16 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: underflow_compare_fold_i16:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: movl %edi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: subl %esi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmpw %di, %ax
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmovael %edi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: # kill: def $ax killed $ax killed $eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: retq
+ %sub = sub i16 %a, %b
+ %cond = tail call i16 @llvm.umin.i16(i16 %sub, i16 %a)
+ ret i16 %cond
+}
+
+; Positive test : i16
+define i16 @underflow_compare_fold_i16_commute(i16 %a, i16 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: underflow_compare_fold_i16_commute:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: movl %edi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: subl %esi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmpw %ax, %di
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmovbl %edi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: # kill: def $ax killed $ax killed $eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: retq
+ %sub = sub i16 %a, %b
+ %cond = tail call i16 @llvm.umin.i16(i16 %a, i16 %sub)
+ ret i16 %cond
+}
+
+; Positive test : i16
+define i16 @underflow_compare_fold_i16_multi_use(i16 %a, i16 %b, ptr addrspace(1) %ptr) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: underflow_compare_fold_i16_multi_use:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: movl %edi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: subl %esi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: movw %ax, (%rdx)
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmpw %di, %ax
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmovael %edi, %eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: # kill: def $ax killed $ax killed $eax
+; CHECK-NEXT: retq
+ %sub = sub i16 %a, %b
+ store i16 %sub, ptr addrspace(1) %ptr
+ %cond = call i16 @llvm.umin.i16(i16 %sub, i16 %a)
+ ret i16 %cond
+}
+
+
+; Negative test, vector types : umin(sub(a,b),a) but with vectors
+define <16 x i8> @underflow_compare_dontfold_vectors(<16 x i8> %a, <16 x i8> %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: underflow_compare_dontfold_vectors:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm2
+; CHECK-NEXT: psubb %xmm1, %xmm2
+; CHECK-NEXT: pminub %xmm2, %xmm0
+; CHECK-NEXT: retq
+ %sub = sub <16 x i8> %a, %b
+ %cond = tail call <16 x i8> @llvm.umin.v16i8(<16 x i8> %sub, <16 x i8> %a)
+ ret <16 x i8> %cond
+}
+
+; Negative test, pattern mismatch : umin(add(a,b),a)
+define i64 @umin_add(i64 %a, i64 %b) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: umin_add:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: leaq (%rsi,%rdi), %rax
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmpq %rdi, %rax
+; CHECK-NEXT: cmovaeq %rdi, %rax
+; CHECK-NEXT: retq
+ %add = add i64 %a, %b
+ %cond = tail call i64 @llvm.umin.i64(i64 %add, i64 %a)
+ ret i64 %cond
+}
|
|
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/59/builds/27395 Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference |
aadeshps-mcw
pushed a commit
to aadeshps-mcw/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2025
Baseline tests from llvm#161651 that were reverted in llvm#167854 Still missing test coverage for the ffmpeg regression failures
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Baseline tests from #161651 that were reverted in #167854
Still missing test coverage for the ffmpeg regression failures