Updating storage-classes to fix outdated redirect URL for volume-provisioning.md in external provisioner specification - #56260
Conversation
…isioning.md in external provisioner specification
|
|
|
Welcome @hclchinmaya! |
✅ Pull request preview available for checkingBuilt without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bismayam The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| listed here (whose names are prefixed with "kubernetes.io" and shipped | ||
| alongside Kubernetes). You can also run and specify external provisioners, | ||
| which are independent programs that follow a [specification](https://git.k8s.io/design-proposals-archive/storage/volume-provisioning.md) | ||
| which are independent programs that follow a [specification](https://github.com/kubernetes/design-proposals-archive/blob/main/storage/volume-provisioning.md) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Even better:
| which are independent programs that follow a [specification](https://github.com/kubernetes/design-proposals-archive/blob/main/storage/volume-provisioning.md) | |
| which are independent programs that follow a specification |
If doing this removal, which I recommend (we avoid linking to archived design proposals), then we should also file an issue about documenting the specification properly.
My guess: the current advice is "use CSI". If that's true, we can update the StorageClass concept to say so.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @lmktfy
Are you suggesting this CSI-related updates to be included in this PR or tracked in a follow-up issue after removal of the archived proposal link ?
|
/lgtm |
|
@victord-ef: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/sig storage |

Description
This PR updates the storage-classes documentation by correcting an outdated redirect URL in the volume-provisioning.md external provisioner specification. The change ensures the documentation points to the current, valid location, improving navigation and preventing broken links for users.
Issue
#56259
Closes: #56259