Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

KEP-3751: Update for milestone 1.31 #4698

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 12, 2024

Conversation

AndrewSirenko
Copy link
Contributor

  • One-line PR description: Update milestone 1.31 and fill out PRR
  • Other comments: Few items to be updated by enhancement freeze.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jun 5, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @AndrewSirenko!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/enhancements 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/enhancements has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @AndrewSirenko. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jun 5, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 5, 2024
@xing-yang
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jun 6, 2024
@xing-yang
Copy link
Contributor

@xing-yang
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @msau42

@AndrewSirenko AndrewSirenko force-pushed the kep-3751 branch 3 times, most recently from 7926df3 to 17401d6 Compare June 6, 2024 21:26
@@ -663,13 +674,13 @@ We expect no non-infra related flakes in the last month as a GA graduation crite

#### Beta

- Beta in 1.30: Since this feature is an extension of the external-resizer/external-provisioner usage flow, we are going to move this to beta with enhanced e2e and test coverage. Test cases are covered in sessions above: ``e2e tests``, ``Integration tests`` etc.
- Beta in 1.31: Since this feature is an extension of the external-resizer/external-provisioner usage flow, we are going to move this to beta with enhanced e2e and test coverage. Test cases are covered in sessions above: ``e2e tests``, ``Integration tests`` etc.
Copy link
Member

@carlory carlory Jun 12, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need two beta stages to solve the beta API not available by default? If so, we may need to mention it in the KEP.

cc @msau42

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we will have 2 beta stages, I will change wording to the following.

- Beta in 1.31 –  Feature gate on API Server enabled by default (Off by default in external-provisioner/external-resizer): Since this feature is an extension of the external-resizer/external-provisioner usage flow, we are going to move this to beta with enhanced e2e and test coverage. Test cases are covered in sessions above: ``e2e tests``, ``Integration tests`` etc. 
- Beta stage 2 in 1.3x – Feature gate enabled API Server **and** external-provisioner/external-resizer by default. 

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's referring to this https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-architecture/3136-beta-apis-off-by-default

So the feature gates are on by default, but the API is off. This implies that the controllers need to handle this.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changing wording back. I assume the following is fine:

- Beta in 1.31: Since this feature is an extension of the external-resizer/external-provisioner usage flow, we are going to move this to beta with enhanced e2e and test coverage. Test cases are covered in sessions above: ``e2e tests``, ``Integration tests`` etc. Controllers will handle VolumeAttributeClass feature gates being on by default, but beta API itself being disabled on clusters by default.

@AndrewSirenko AndrewSirenko force-pushed the kep-3751 branch 2 times, most recently from 1c57fcb to 8d683fd Compare June 12, 2024 18:45
@johnbelamaric
Copy link
Member

/hold for SIG approval
/approve for PRR

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jun 12, 2024
@johnbelamaric
Copy link
Member

Once there is SIG approval you can unhold (my approval doesn't count for the SIG, but the tooling looks that way).

@msau42
Copy link
Member

msau42 commented Jun 12, 2024

/lgtm
/approve

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Jun 12, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AndrewSirenko, johnbelamaric, msau42

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit b493f27 into kubernetes:master Jun 12, 2024
4 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.31 milestone Jun 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants