-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
Migrated KEP to new format | sig-node | kubelet-container-resources-cri-api-changes #2266
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Welcome @shekhar-rajak! |
|
Hi @shekhar-rajak. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
| @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ | |||
| title: Container Resources CRI API Changes for Pod Vertical Scaling | |||
| kep-number: 1342 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This shouldn't be 1342 (same for directory).
The number (being also prefix of directory) should be the number of corresponding issue in the repo (and I think there isn't yet any for this, so a new one should be opened).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was trying to look for it too and I didn't find any. So I'm almost sure there simply isn't any and you probably need to open a dedicated one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the info. I have created an issue for this: #2273
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you please review the issue #2273 and this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks fine to me - though you need approval from SIG node leads anyway.
…format see-also field link updated kubelet-container-resources-cri-api-changes: migrate old keps to new format 1287-in-place-update-pod-resources: see-also link updated kep-number added Corrected the kep-number
|
/ok-to-test /assign @derekwaynecarr Derek - can you please approve? |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: derekwaynecarr, shekhar-rajak The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Migrated the one sig-node kep to the new format.
keps/sig-node/1342-kubelet-container-resources-cri-api-changes Folder added and few links updated.
ref: #2220