feat(chart): VPA Updater deployment

[phuhung273]

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

VPA Updater add deployment

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Relates #8587

Special notes for your reviewer:

Quick test with this vpa.yaml

updater:
  enabled: true
  image:
    repository: registry.k8s.io/autoscaling/vpa-updater
    tag: 1.5.1
    pullPolicy: Always
  podLabels:
    foo: bar
  podAnnotations:
    foo: bar

helm upgrade --install vpa ./vertical-pod-autoscaler/charts/vertical-pod-autoscaler/ \
  -n vpa --create-namespace \
  -f vpa.yaml

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @phuhung273. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a github.com member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[omerap12]

Thanks for this!
/lgtm
/assign @adrianmoisey

[phuhung273]

Thanks for your review Omer!

[adrianmoisey]

Should the updater also get the PDB and lease treatment, similar to the recommender?

See #8646

[omerap12]

Should the updater also get the PDB and lease treatment, similar to the recommender?

See #8646

Of course ( I thought Hung probably preferred to do that in a followup )

[phuhung273]

Should the updater also get the PDB and lease treatment, similar to the recommender?

Yes it should. Im just trying to follow the parent issue to have them separated. Although stuffs like PDB,SA,resources are just few lines change. But i want to keep it easier to review and welcome other contributors.

[adrianmoisey]

Yes it should. Im just trying to follow the parent issue to have them separated. Although stuffs like PDB,SA,resources are just few lines change. But i want to keep it easier to review and welcome other contributors.

Gotcha, no problem! Thought I'd ask

[adrianmoisey]

The only nit I have, is this should be 1 if the lease isn't configured yet
No biggie since this is a pre-stable release, but I think it's good to be correct here

[phuhung273]

Yeah no worries. Thanks for your review.

[adrianmoisey]

/ok-to-test
/lgtm

Thanks! The Helm chart is starting to take shape!

[omerap12]

Looks good!

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: omerap12, phuhung273

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• vertical-pod-autoscaler/charts/vertical-pod-autoscaler/OWNERS [omerap12]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment