Skip to content

fix(metrics): add CNAME to known record types#6115

Merged
k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:masterfrom
marie-j:dev/mjones/cname-metrics
Jan 15, 2026
Merged

fix(metrics): add CNAME to known record types#6115
k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:masterfrom
marie-j:dev/mjones/cname-metrics

Conversation

@marie-j
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@marie-j marie-j commented Jan 15, 2026

What does it do ?

Add metrics for CNAME records

Motivation

Currently all records types metrics are added except this one

More

  • Yes, this PR title follows Conventional Commits
  • Yes, I added unit tests
  • Yes, I updated end user documentation accordingly

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link
Copy Markdown

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jan 15, 2026

CLA Signed
The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: marie-j / name: Marie JONES (e59b70b)

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Welcome @marie-j!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/external-dns 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/external-dns has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jan 15, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi @marie-j. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added controller Issues or PRs related to the controller size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 15, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mloiseleur mloiseleur left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/ok-to-test
🤔 There were probably a reason why it was not here. @ivankatliarchuk Wdyt ?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jan 15, 2026
@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 21039444759

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 7 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 79.084%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
endpoint.go 7 91.01%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 21008822670: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 16032
Relevant Lines: 20272

💛 - Coveralls

@ivankatliarchuk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 15, 2026
@mloiseleur
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mloiseleur

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 15, 2026
@mloiseleur
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks @marie-j 👍

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 4ee50aa into kubernetes-sigs:master Jan 15, 2026
23 checks passed
ivankatliarchuk added a commit to gofogo/k8s-sigs-external-dns-fork that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2026
* master: (25 commits)
  feat(event): standardize event messages and add resource kind lookup for events (kubernetes-sigs#6101)
  refactor(informers): unify cache sync functions using generics (kubernetes-sigs#6102)
  fix(fqdn): support kind and api version (kubernetes-sigs#6097)
  test(fqdn): cover sources without any fqdn tests (kubernetes-sigs#6094)
  chore(tools): CRD generation script moved and add validation workflow (kubernetes-sigs#6079)
  fix(metrics): add CNAME to known record types (kubernetes-sigs#6115)
  chore(cloudflare): migrate customhostname to v5 (kubernetes-sigs#5891)
  test(provider/exoscale): improved the test coverage for exoscale provider from 62.8% to 80.4%  (kubernetes-sigs#6112)
  feat(source): gateway api hostname source annotation (kubernetes-sigs#5959)
  test: cover pkg/events/fake package (kubernetes-sigs#6096)
  refactor(controller): controller no longer responsible for SingletonClientGenerator creation (kubernetes-sigs#6077)
  refactor(source): standardize FQDN template accross sources (kubernetes-sigs#6093)
  feat(coredns): rename ownerId and ownedBy to owner (kubernetes-sigs#6032)
  docs: fix typo in README (The are → There are) (kubernetes-sigs#6095)
  refactor(aws): abstract provider-specific boolean parsing (kubernetes-sigs#6078)
  refactor(api): deduplicate addKnownTypes (kubernetes-sigs#6087)
  fix(api): rollback changes for omitempty (kubernetes-sigs#6086)
  chore(deps): bump renovatebot/github-action (kubernetes-sigs#6080)
  fix(aws): enable AWS API validation for routing policies without setIdentifier (kubernetes-sigs#6082)
  chore(aws): document and test behavior for ALB and NLB (kubernetes-sigs#6063)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. controller Issues or PRs related to the controller lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants