Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 7 additions & 7 deletions docs/book/src/tasks/experimental-features/machine-pools.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -31,10 +31,10 @@ Although MachinePools provide a similar feature to MachineDeployments, MachinePo

The following Cluster API infrastructure providers have implemented support for MachinePools:

| Provider | Implementations | Status | Documentation |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AWS | `AWSManagedMachinePool`<br> `AWSMachinePool` | Implemented, MachinePoolMachines supported | https://cluster-api-aws.sigs.k8s.io/topics/machinepools.html|
| Azure | `AzureASOManagedMachinePool`<br> `AzureManagedMachinePool`<br> `AzureMachinePool` | Implemented, MachinePoolMachines supported | https://capz.sigs.k8s.io/self-managed/machinepools |
| GCP | `GCPMachinePool` | In Progress | https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-gcp/pull/1506 |
| OCI | `OCIManagedMachinePool`<br> `OCIMachinePool` | Implemented, MachinePoolMachines supported | https://oracle.github.io/cluster-api-provider-oci/managed/managedcluster.html |
| Scaleway | `ScalewayManagedMachinePool` | Implemented | https://github.com/scaleway/cluster-api-provider-scaleway/blob/main/docs/scalewaymanagedmachinepool.md |
| Provider | Implementations | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| [AWS](https://cluster-api-aws.sigs.k8s.io/topics/machinepools.html) | `AWSManagedMachinePool`<br> `AWSMachinePool`<br>`ROSAMachinePool` | Implemented, MachinePoolMachines supported |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great that ROSAMacvhinePool was added.

| [Azure](https://capz.sigs.k8s.io/self-managed/machinepools) | `AzureASOManagedMachinePool`<br> `AzureManagedMachinePool`<br> `AzureMachinePool` | Implemented, MachinePoolMachines supported |
| [GCP](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-gcp/pull/1506) | `GCPMachinePool` | In Progress |
| [OCI](https://oracle.github.io/cluster-api-provider-oci/managed/managedcluster.html) | `OCIManagedMachinePool`<br> `OCIMachinePool` | Implemented, MachinePoolMachines supported |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

q: should we document when a provider support deletion of single MPM (IIRC a few feature depend on this, like e.g. the capability to use MHC)

Note. this can be added also as a follow up if you prefer

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be good to do that. Shall we do that as a follow-up?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@richardcase PR was merged, if you think this suggestion if it brings value, I would suggest to add it to the tracking issue

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just added that suggestion in #12872

| [Scaleway](https://github.com/scaleway/cluster-api-provider-scaleway/blob/main/docs/scalewaymanagedmachinepool.md) | `ScalewayManagedMachinePool` | Implemented |
Loading