Skip to content

[PR-Reviewer] Refactor SearchView color application logic#41

Draft
Copilot wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
copilot/review-pull-request-32187
Draft

[PR-Reviewer] Refactor SearchView color application logic#41
Copilot wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
copilot/review-pull-request-32187

Conversation

Copy link

Copilot AI commented Nov 20, 2025

Review Feedback for PR dotnet#32187

This PR fixes Issue dotnet#25153 where SearchBar underline and search icon don't update on Android theme changes.

Assessment

Recommendation: ⚠️ Request Changes (minor)

Code Quality: Excellent refactoring following DRY principles. Eliminates duplicate icon tinting code and adds missing underline tinting.

Test Coverage: 20 visual test snapshots updated correctly.

Required Change

Update method documentation to use XML format:

// Current:
// Tints the magnifier icon and the underline
static void ApplyDecorColor(SearchView searchView, Color color)

// Should be:
/// <summary>
/// Tints the magnifier icon and the underline.
/// </summary>
static void ApplyDecorColor(SearchView searchView, Color color)

Technical Analysis

Root Cause: UpdatePlaceholderColor and UpdateTextColor only tinted magnifier icon, not the underline (search_plate background).

The Fix: New ApplyDecorColor() method tints both elements atomically:

  • Magnifier icon (search_mag_icon)
  • Underline (search_plate background)

Why This Works: Theme changes invoke UpdateTextColor/UpdatePlaceholderColorApplyDecorColor ensures both decorative elements update together.

Design Note

ApplyDecorColor only applies when using default theme colors (i.e., when PlaceholderColor or TextColor is null). Custom colors affect text only; decorative elements follow theme unless overridden via SearchIconColor property.


Detailed review: See Review_Feedback_Issue_25153.md

Original prompt

please review dotnet#32187

Custom agent used: pr-reviewer
Specialized agent for conducting thorough, constructive code reviews of .NET MAUI pull requests


💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.

kubaflo and others added 3 commits November 21, 2025 00:22
Condensed and reorganized .github/agents/pr-reviewer.md to reference new modular instruction files for PR review workflow. Added core guidelines and supporting documents under .github/instructions/pr-reviewer-agent/ for time management, edge cases, error handling, output format, safe area testing, sandbox setup, and testing procedures. This improves maintainability and clarity for PR reviewer agent processes.

Remove lessons learned and instruction improvement docs

Update core-guidelines.md

- fixes

Add checkpoint/resume system for PR review agent

Introduces a checkpoint/resume workflow for the PR review agent to handle environment limitations during testing. Updates the main agent instructions to reference the new checkpoint system and provides detailed guidelines for creating, documenting, and resuming checkpoints in `.github/instructions/pr-reviewer-agent/checkpoint-resume.md`.

Update AI agent usage instructions in README

Clarifies usage by splitting instructions into two options: GitHub Copilot CLI (local) and GitHub Copilot Agents (web). Adds step-by-step guidance for using the web interface.

- update prompt file

- improve instructions

Removed the screenshots part

Better PRs content

The issue resolver (#22)

Update issue-resolver.md

The issue resolver (#20)
Clarified mandatory PR title prefix for agent-generated PRs and expanded the review output format to include a detailed, collapsible markdown structure. Added explicit requirements for file naming, section organization, and review metadata to improve consistency and clarity in PR feedback.
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Review changes in pull request 32187 [PR-Reviewer] Refactor SearchView color application logic Nov 20, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from kubaflo November 20, 2025 23:47
@kubaflo kubaflo force-pushed the main branch 2 times, most recently from 790e973 to 971e326 Compare November 22, 2025 14:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants