Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve access-control types #4854

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 15, 2021
Merged

Improve access-control types #4854

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 15, 2021

Conversation

timleslie
Copy link
Contributor

This isn't the final form of these types, but it gets things a bit more organised before we shuffle things across files.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 15, 2021

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployment, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/keystonejs/keystone-next-docs/1s6rqrp7a
✅ Preview: https://keystone-next-docs-git-access-context-types.keystonejs.vercel.app

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Feb 15, 2021

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 4c52c0c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 2 packages
Name Type
@keystone-next/keystone Patch
@keystonejs/test-utils Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

@gwyneplaine gwyneplaine left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview February 15, 2021 23:15 Inactive
@timleslie timleslie merged commit c8cf7fb into master Feb 15, 2021
@timleslie timleslie deleted the access-context-types branch February 15, 2021 23:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants