Fix saved-package search test schema and select for the hidden column

[kody-bot]

Fixes the main-branch Validate failure introduced by the concurrent merges of #745 and #746.

What happened

• Add account packages route for browsing saved package metadata #745 added repo-search.workers.test.ts with a local saved_packages test schema.
• Hide packages from search by default #746 added the required hidden column to SavedPackageRow and insertSavedPackage.
• Each PR validated green against its own base, but combined on main the workers-unit suite fails with D1_ERROR: table saved_packages has no column named hidden (see the Validate run for d857526a).

Fix

• Add the hidden column to the test schema and buildRow (with a satisfies check against the insertSavedPackage row type so future column drift fails typecheck).
• Include hidden in the searchSavedPackagesByUserId SELECT so browse results report real visibility instead of always false.

Testing

• npm run validate fully green locally on this branch (format, lint, typecheck, 856 unit tests, 14 Playwright E2E, MCP E2E).

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Fixed saved package searches so hidden package status is preserved correctly in returned results.
  • Ensured paginated saved package listings accurately reflect whether each package is hidden or visible.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 0bd229d0-1986-4a17-ac86-89c6af2e863f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d857526 and 978b9f0.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• packages/worker/src/package-registry/repo-search.workers.test.ts
• packages/worker/src/package-registry/repo.ts

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The saved-package test schema and row builder now support hidden, while searchSavedPackagesByUserId selects the column so mapped search results retain its value.

Changes

Saved package hidden state

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Hidden column test contract packages/worker/src/package-registry/repo-search.workers.test.ts	The test schema adds a constrained hidden column, and buildRow accepts and converts an optional boolean into the stored integer value with parameter type checking.
Search hidden-column projection packages/worker/src/package-registry/repo.ts	The saved-package items query selects hidden for mapping into returned records.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Suggested reviewers: kentcdodds

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately summarizes the main fix: adding the hidden column to the test schema and selecting it in saved-package search.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch cursor/fix-repo-search-test-hidden-column-ee05

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[github-actions]

🔎 Preview deployed: https://kody-pr-749.kody-a99.workers.dev

Worker: kody-pr-749
D1: kody-pr-749-db
KV: kody-pr-749-oauth-kv

Mocks:

• cloudflare: https://kody-pr-749-mock-cloudflare.kody-a99.workers.dev/__mocks (kody-pr-749-mock-cloudflare)

[kody-bot]

Closing: #748 landed the identical fix (same test-schema column, buildRow hidden field, and hidden in the search SELECT) while this PR was in CI.