-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
Support &[thing=""]
syntax
#91
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Yes, that should be supported. It might be as simple as adding Line 63 in b855193
And I guess the same should go for |
Fixed in #92, Thanks! |
kaj
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 25, 2021
Progress: 2892 of 5945 tests passed in dart-sass compatibility mode. ### Breaking changes Lots of things have been moved around. See `Scope`, `Numeric`, and `Function` in particular. ### Improvements * Support `@use` of user-defined modules. PR #96. * Improve trigonometric precision by using f64 π rather than rational. * Handle more peculiarities with atan2, pow, infinities and negative zero. * Improve name lookups in scopes and modules, PR #87. * new `struct Scope` replaces trait and three structs. PR #95. * A color can be Hsla or Hwba as well as Rgba. PR #88, #89. * Handle units in `@for` loops inside sass functions. * Some types moved into `value` mod, imporoved docs. PR #90. * Add support for `$=`, `~=` and `^=` in css attribute selectors. Issue #91, PR #92. * A `Numeric` is a Number with a Unit. Also hide NumValue enum. PR #93. * The `SassFunction` type is now named `sass::Function`. * Test suite sass-spec updated to 2021-02-18. * Some cleanups. Thanks to @mfeckie for #91/#92. Tested with rustc 1.50.0 (cb75ad5db 2021-02-10), rustc 1.48.0 (7eac88abb 2020-11-16), rustc 1.46.0 (04488afe3 2020-08-24), rustc 1.44.1 (c7087fe00 2020-06-17), rustc 1.51.0-beta.3 (b631c914c 2021-02-24), and rustc 1.52.0-nightly (a8486b64b 2021-02-24).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Do you have a sense of how difficult it would be to support this type of syntax ?
I'm happy to put some work into it myself if you can point me in the right direction.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: