test(querier): RFC 0002 red gate — DSL acceptance stubs - #144
Conversation
|
@coderabbitai review |
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 12 minutes and 48 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds the RFC 0002 “Query DSL” red-gate acceptance test scaffolding to the ourios-querier crate, establishing a greppable mapping between RFC §5 acceptance criteria and (currently ignored) test stubs while the DSL parser/compiler work lands in later slices.
Changes:
- Introduces an integration test file with 11
#[ignore]’dunimplemented!()stubs for scenarios RFC0002.1–RFC0002.11. - Adds module-level documentation describing the red-gate intent and how these stubs relate to the already-implemented RFC 0007 execution layer.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Red-gate step for the query DSL (RFC 0002 specified→red, docs/verification.md §3 two-loop): 11 #[ignore]'d unimplemented!() stubs for RFC0002.1–.11, each carrying the §2.2 doc-comment form (/// Scenario RFC0002.<n> — <title>. + /// See `docs/rfcs/0002-query-dsl.md` §5.). The parser + compiler flip these green in slices, fronting the implemented RFC 0007 §5 execution layer. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
39bdb5f to
b7c6d47
Compare
…e blocker Review: RFC 0002 status note now credits #143 (the spec PR) alongside #144-#154; RFC 0007 §8 + the alternatives no longer say parser integration is blocked on the RFC 0002 §3 branch decision (resolved, Branch B) — the contradiction with the green status note is removed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
What
RFC 0002 red gate (query DSL
specified → red,docs/verification.md§3 two-loop): 11#[ignore]'dunimplemented!()stubs for the §5 acceptance criteria RFC0002.1–.11, each carrying the §2.2 doc-comment form (/// Scenario RFC0002.<n> — <title>.+/// See docs/rfcs/0002-query-dsl.md §5.) so the spec↔test mapping is greppable.These front the already-implemented RFC 0007 §5 execution layer (predicate pushdown, tenant isolation,
QueryStats— all green). The parser + compiler flip the stubs green in slices:.1/.2/.7/.8)Filter, no leakage) + default window + severity mapping + first-class fields (.3/.4/.5/.6)resolves_to(.9).10/.11)Verification
cargo test -p ourios-querier --test rfc0002_dsl→ 11 ignored (red gate). ·cargo clippy --all-targets -- -D warnings✓ ·cargo fmt --all --check✓🤖 Generated with Claude Code