Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Print deprecation warning when using -jnlpUrl #8773

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 13, 2023
Merged

Conversation

basil
Copy link
Member

@basil basil commented Dec 11, 2023

Upgrade to the latest release of Remoting, which prints this warning on the client side, and also add a similar warning on the server side as well to maximize the chances that the warning is actually seen by an administrator.

Testing done

Connected with -jnlpUrl and verified that the warning was printed on both the server and client side. Connected with -url and -name and verified that the warning was no longer printed on either the server or client side.

Proposed changelog entries

  • The -jnlpUrl ${JENKINS_URL}/computer/${AGENT_NAME}/jenkins-agent.jnlp argument to the agent JAR has been deprecated; use -url ${JENKINS_URL} and -name ${AGENT_NAME} instead, potentially also passing in -webSocket, -tunnel, and/or work directory options as needed.

Proposed upgrade guidelines

  • The -jnlpUrl ${JENKINS_URL}/computer/${AGENT_NAME}/jenkins-agent.jnlp argument to the agent JAR has been deprecated; use -url ${JENKINS_URL} and -name ${AGENT_NAME} instead, potentially also passing in -webSocket, -tunnel, and/or work directory options as needed. Official Docker images already use the new calling convention.

Submitter checklist

Desired reviewers

@mention

Before the changes are marked as ready-for-merge:

Maintainer checklist

@basil basil added the upgrade-guide-needed This changes might be breaking in rare circumstances, an entry in the LTS upgrade guide is needed label Dec 11, 2023
@NotMyFault NotMyFault added the rfe For changelog: Minor enhancement. use `major-rfe` for changes to be highlighted label Dec 12, 2023
@NotMyFault NotMyFault requested a review from a team December 12, 2023 07:02
Copy link
Member

@timja timja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

@timja
Copy link
Member

timja commented Dec 12, 2023

/label ready-for-merge


This PR is now ready for merge, after ~24 hours, we will merge it if there's no negative feedback.

Thanks!

@comment-ops-bot comment-ops-bot bot added the ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback label Dec 12, 2023
@basil basil merged commit 05037a0 into jenkinsci:master Dec 13, 2023
17 checks passed
@basil basil deleted the jnlpUrl branch December 13, 2023 19:10
@pjwiseman
Copy link

pjwiseman commented Sep 5, 2024

The proposed (and implemented) changelog entries and warning does not mention the need to obtain a "secret" for connecting the agent, especially when using websockets. That "secret" used to be included in the jnlp file. The secret can now only be obtained by running a script, and only administrators can run scripts through a rest api. There needs to be a mechanism where the secret can be obtained programmatically (via the rest api) by a user with Agent Create or Agent Connect permissions.

jenkins.model.Jenkins.getInstance().getComputer("{node.name}").getJnlpMac()

@daniel-beck
Copy link
Member

@pjwiseman

The secret can now only be obtained by running a script, and only administrators can run scripts through a rest api.

Alternatively, navigate to /computer/agentnamehere/ and copy it from one of the examples there.

There needs to be a mechanism where the secret can be obtained programmatically (via the rest api) by a user with Agent Create or Agent Connect permissions.

I suggest you file a feature request in the issue tracker.

@pjwiseman
Copy link

@daniel-beck Thanks for the push. Feature request raised.
https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-73735

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback rfe For changelog: Minor enhancement. use `major-rfe` for changes to be highlighted upgrade-guide-needed This changes might be breaking in rare circumstances, an entry in the LTS upgrade guide is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants