-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Translation to Brasilian Portuguese Br #2
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Merged. Please feel free to push these changes directly! |
daniel-beck
referenced
this pull request
in daniel-beck/jenkins
Aug 5, 2014
When reducing the number of executors from M to N, previously it'd kill all idle executors, and then create executors 0...N-1 unless they already exist (busy executors). This can lead to the situation where e.g. executor #5 is busy and retained, and when setting the number of executors to 3, 0...2 are created, resulting temporarily having 4 executors. This change prevents #2 from being created in the example. When #4 is finished, it'll be killed anyway and a new executor #2 created, so after some time the executor indexes are cleaned up matching expectations.
daniel-beck
referenced
this pull request
in daniel-beck/jenkins
Oct 19, 2014
When reducing the number of executors from M to N, previously it'd kill all idle executors, and then create executors 0...N-1 unless they already exist (busy executors). This can lead to the situation where e.g. executor #5 is busy and retained, and when setting the number of executors to 3, 0...2 are created, resulting temporarily having 4 executors. This change prevents #2 from being created in the example. When #4 is finished, it'll be killed anyway and a new executor #2 created, so after some time the executor indexes are cleaned up matching expectations.
jglick
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2015
[SECURITY-163] Non-browser-based DownloadService
stephenc
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2015
[JENKINS-27871] - Added a direct unit test for the issue
gusreiber
pushed a commit
to gusreiber/jenkins
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2016
Reviews in the UI.
oleg-nenashev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 16, 2016
…cription() (#2448) * [JENKINS-36592] Prevent NPE in BlockedBecauseOfBuildInProgress#getDescription() in the case of race condition * [JENKINS-36592] - Address comments from @jglick * [JENKINS-36592] - Fix wording. Attempt #2
oleg-nenashev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2019
Changed references to "slave" and "slaves" to "agent" and "agents"
5 tasks
timja
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2020
More Javadoc to help implementers, simplify code a bit
This was referenced Feb 1, 2022
NotMyFault
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 21, 2023
…py.js menu (#8340) * refresh hetero-list UI use new button style replace the YUI menu with a tippy menu * fix lint errors * avoid blanks * prettier * keep button in div * fix test * fix test #2 * convert inputs to buttons for plugins * prettier * remove unnecessary style definition * remove adjunct * adjust filter --------- Co-authored-by: Tim Jacomb <[email protected]>
yaroslavafenkin
pushed a commit
to yaroslavafenkin/jenkins
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2023
…py.js menu (jenkinsci#8340) * refresh hetero-list UI use new button style replace the YUI menu with a tippy menu * fix lint errors * avoid blanks * prettier * keep button in div * fix test * fix test jenkinsci#2 * convert inputs to buttons for plugins * prettier * remove unnecessary style definition * remove adjunct * adjust filter --------- Co-authored-by: Tim Jacomb <[email protected]>
adambkaplan
added a commit
to adambkaplan/jenkinsci-jenkins
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 21, 2024
…o-jenkins-war Red Hat Konflux update jenkins-war
krisstern
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2025
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi kohsuke,
This is my first Brazilian Portuguese version of the Hudson.
I hope the community likes.
We still have much work to do .... will soon post more.
Thanks,
Cleiber