-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(j-s): Switch indictment confirmation request #17153
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #17153 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 35.73% 35.65% -0.08%
==========================================
Files 6928 6923 -5
Lines 147817 147945 +128
Branches 42127 42210 +83
==========================================
- Hits 52818 52747 -71
- Misses 94999 95198 +199
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 54 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)
Pattern apps/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (4)
Learnt from: oddsson
PR: island-is/island.is#16731
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview/IndictmentOverview.tsx:172-186
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:20.157Z
Learning: In `IndictmentOverview.tsx`, since the defendants data does not change, using `useMemo` to memoize the filtering logic is unnecessary.
Learnt from: gudjong
PR: island-is/island.is#16863
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx:194-200
Timestamp: 2024-11-27T14:34:38.028Z
Learning: In `Overview.tsx`, the `defendant.subpoenas` array never contains null or undefined `subpoena` objects, so additional null checks are not needed.
Learnt from: unakb
PR: island-is/island.is#14712
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/IndictmentOverview.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:11.835Z
Learning: The judicial system application uses a toaster notification system to handle errors globally.
Learnt from: unakb
PR: island-is/island.is#15378
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:11.835Z
Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)
286-290
: LGTM! Radio button reordering aligns with UI conventions
The placement of the deny option before the confirm option follows the common UI pattern of positioning negative actions on the left and positive actions on the right, improving user experience through consistent interface patterns.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 332 Passed, 0 Skipped, 1m 18.1s Total Time |
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Switch indictment confirmation request
Asana
What
Switch indictment confirmation request so that the deny option is first and accept is second.
Why
We generally place the yes option on the right and the no option on the left
Screenshots / Gifs
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes