fix(j-s): Fix InfoCard #16830
fix(j-s): Fix InfoCard #16830
Conversation
…e-announcement-defenders
…e-announcement-defenders
…e-announcement-defenders
…d-is/island.is into j-s/service-announcement-defenders
…e-announcement-defenders
…e-announcement-defenders
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16830 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 36.43% 36.44%
=======================================
Files 6852 6852
Lines 143524 143480 -44
Branches 40961 40934 -27
=======================================
- Hits 52300 52291 -9
+ Misses 91224 91189 -35
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 2 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 2 Passed Test Services
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/InfoCard/DefendantInfo/DefendantInfo.tsx (1)
116-130: Consider removing explicit whitespace handlingWhile the defender info rendering is well-structured, the explicit whitespace handling with
whiteSpace="pre"might not be necessary. Consider letting the UI component handle the spacing naturally.- <Text as="span" whiteSpace="pre" fontWeight="semiBold"> + <Text as="span" fontWeight="semiBold">
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/InfoCard/DefendantInfo/DefendantInfo.tsx(3 hunks)apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/InfoCard/DefendantInfo/DefendantInfo.tsx (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (2)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/InfoCard/DefendantInfo/DefendantInfo.tsx (2)
Learnt from: oddsson
PR: island-is/island.is#15461
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/InfoCard/DefendantInfo/DefendantInfo.tsx:36-62
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:20.157Z
Learning: The user prefers readability over optimization in the `getAppealExpirationInfo` function within `DefendantInfo.tsx`.
Learnt from: oddsson
PR: island-is/island.is#15461
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/InfoCard/DefendantInfo/DefendantInfo.tsx:36-62
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:11.835Z
Learning: The user prefers readability over optimization in the `getAppealExpirationInfo` function within `DefendantInfo.tsx`.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (5)
Learnt from: oddsson
PR: island-is/island.is#16731
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview/IndictmentOverview.tsx:172-186
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:20.157Z
Learning: In `IndictmentOverview.tsx`, since the defendants data does not change, using `useMemo` to memoize the filtering logic is unnecessary.
Learnt from: unakb
PR: island-is/island.is#14712
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/IndictmentOverview.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:11.835Z
Learning: The judicial system application uses a toaster notification system to handle errors globally.
Learnt from: unakb
PR: island-is/island.is#14712
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/IndictmentOverview.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:11.835Z
Learning: The judicial system application uses a toaster notification system to handle errors globally.
Learnt from: unakb
PR: island-is/island.is#15378
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:11.835Z
Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.
Learnt from: unakb
PR: island-is/island.is#15378
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:11.835Z
Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/InfoCard/DefendantInfo/DefendantInfo.tsx (2)
78-87: Well-structured defender information handling!
The introduction of these variables improves code readability and maintainability by consolidating the defender information logic. The TypeScript types are properly maintained, ensuring type safety.
Line range hint 140-147: Correctly implements the service requirement display fix
The additional check for defendant.serviceRequirement properly addresses the PR objective, ensuring the verdict view date is only displayed when the service requirement is selected.
Let's verify this change doesn't affect other components:
✅ Verification successful
The service requirement check is correctly implemented and verified
The additional check for defendant.serviceRequirement in the verdict view date display is properly implemented and consistent with the codebase:
- The test file confirms proper handling of all service requirement states (REQUIRED, NOT_REQUIRED, NOT_APPLICABLE)
- The
Completed.tsxcomponent shows service requirement is a required field for rulings BlueBoxWithDate.tsxdemonstrates consistent usage of the service requirement check for verdict view date display
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components that might be affected by this change
rg -l "serviceRequirement" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for test files that should be updated
rg -l "DefendantInfo.*verdictViewDate" --type test
Length of output: 157
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files containing serviceRequirement
rg -l "serviceRequirement"
# Search for test files containing DefendantInfo and verdictViewDate
rg -l "DefendantInfo.*verdictViewDate" --type-list
rg -l "DefendantInfo.*verdictViewDate"
Length of output: 1622
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the test file for verdict view date related tests
cat apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/InfoCard/DefendantInfo/DefendantInfo.spec.ts
# Check other components that use serviceRequirement for potential impacts
cat apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Completed/Completed.tsx
cat apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/BlueBoxWithIcon/BlueBoxWithDate.tsx
Length of output: 25241
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)
228-228: Verify the service requirements display logic
While the shorthand syntax for displayVerdictViewDate is valid, let's verify that this change correctly addresses the core issue of displaying service requirements only when selected by the court.
Let's analyze the InfoCard component implementation:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/InfoCard/InfoCard.spec.tsx (3)
Line range hint
89-134: Fix nested render calls in test caseThere's a critical issue with nested
rendercalls in the test "should display the assigned defender name, email and phonenumber if that info is provided". This will create multiple test environments and may cause unreliable results.Apply this fix to remove the nested render:
test('should display the assigned defender name, email and phonenumber if that info is provided', async () => { // Arrange render( <MockedProvider> <LocaleProvider locale="is" messages={{}}> - render( - <MockedProvider> - <LocaleProvider locale="is" messages={{}}> <InfoCard sections={[ { id: 'sec_id', items: [ { id: 'itm_id', title: 'Titill', values: [ <DefendantInfo defendant={{ id: 'def_id', defenderName: 'Joe', defenderEmail: '[email protected]', defenderPhoneNumber: '455-5544', }} />, ], }, ], }, ]} /> - </LocaleProvider> - </MockedProvider> - , ) </LocaleProvider> </MockedProvider>, )
Line range hint
35-36: Standardize assertion methods across testsThe tests use inconsistent assertion styles. Some use direct text matching while others use content matching functions. For better maintainability and reliability, we should standardize on using the content matching approach.
Standardize all assertions to use the content matching pattern:
- expect(await screen.findByText('Joe')).toBeTruthy() + expect( + await screen.findByText( + (_, element) => element?.textContent === 'Joe', + ), + ).toBeTruthy()Also applies to: 73-77, 127-132, 152-155
Line range hint
9-10: Enhance test coverage with edge cases and accessibility testsWhile the basic defender information scenarios are covered, consider adding:
- Tests for error states (e.g., malformed defender data)
- Accessibility tests using
jest-axe- Edge cases (e.g., very long defender names/emails)
Would you like me to provide examples of these additional test cases?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/InfoCard/InfoCard.spec.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/InfoCard/InfoCard.spec.tsx (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
thordurhhh
added
automerge
* Checkpoint * Refactor AlertMessage * Format date * Cleanup * Cleanup * Merge * Add key * Refactor * Remove console.log * Refactoring * Merge * Show to prosecutors * Fix tests --------- Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Guðjón Guðjónsson <[email protected]>
Fix InfoCard
Asana
What
We are currently showing the service requirement for prosecutors in incomplete cases. This pr fixes that. Now, we only show the service requirement if the court has selected the service requirement.
Why
It's a bug
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
DefendantInfoandOverviewcomponents, enhancing maintainability and clarity.Tests
InfoCardcomponent to improve specificity and correctness.