Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(accident notification): Set final review to completed status #15895

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 9, 2024

Conversation

norda-gunni
Copy link
Member

@norda-gunni norda-gunni commented Sep 4, 2024

...

Attach a link to issue if relevant

What

Specify what you're trying to achieve

Why

Specify why you need to achieve this

Screenshots / Gifs

Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated the status of accident notifications to reflect completion once they reach the final review stage, enhancing the clarity of the application's review process.

@norda-gunni norda-gunni requested a review from a team as a code owner September 4, 2024 15:33
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The change involves updating the status property within the meta object of the AccidentNotificationTemplate to reflect a transition from 'inprogress' to 'completed' for the States.IN_FINAL_REVIEW state. This modification indicates a shift in the application's state management related to the review process.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts Changed status from 'inprogress' to 'completed' for States.IN_FINAL_REVIEW.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2af2801 and 40e8d7d.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Additional comments not posted (1)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts (1)

277-277: Verify the impact of changing the status to 'completed'.

Ensure that marking the final review as completed aligns with the expected behavior of the application and doesn't introduce any unintended consequences.

Consider running the following script to search for potential issues:

Verification successful

Verification successful: The status change to 'completed' is isolated.

The change from 'inprogress' to 'completed' in the AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts does not impact other parts of the codebase, as there are no external dependencies on States.IN_FINAL_REVIEW. The change appears to be safe and aligns with the intended behavior within this specific file.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for potential issues related to the status change.

# Test 1: Search for other occurrences of 'inprogress' status. 
# Expect: No concerning usages that might be impacted.
rg --type typescript $'status.+inprogress' -g '!AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts'

# Test 2: Search for logic that depends on the final review status.
# Expect: No concerning usages that might break due to the status change.
rg --type typescript $'States.IN_FINAL_REVIEW' -g '!AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts'

Length of output: 233


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for potential issues related to the status change.

# Test 1: Search for other occurrences of 'inprogress' status.
# Expect: No concerning usages that might be impacted.
rg 'status.+inprogress' -g '*.ts' -g '!AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts'

# Test 2: Search for logic that depends on the final review status.
# Expect: No concerning usages that might break due to the status change.
rg 'States.IN_FINAL_REVIEW' -g '*.ts' -g '!AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts'

Length of output: 7849

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.91%. Comparing base (a4d80c4) to head (e762ad7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #15895      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   36.82%   36.91%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files        6692     6689       -3     
  Lines      137101   136619     -482     
  Branches    38975    38809     -166     
==========================================
- Hits        50481    50432      -49     
+ Misses      86620    86187     -433     
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.39% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 41.68% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 23.55% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
application-templates-accident-notification 19.83% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-shell 21.13% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...tification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts 22.78% <ø> (ø)

... and 30 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a4d80c4...e762ad7. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Sep 4, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: fix/add-final-state-to-accident-report
Commit report: 7b28d03
Test service: api

✅ 0 Failed, 4 Passed, 0 Skipped, 2.97s Total Time
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 no change

@norda-gunni norda-gunni added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Sep 9, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 10cd895 into main Sep 9, 2024
36 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the fix/add-final-state-to-accident-report branch September 9, 2024 09:03
thoreyjona pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2024
)

Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
jonnigs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2024
)

Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants