Skip to content

Conversation

@sippsack
Copy link

No description provided.

@sippsack sippsack requested a review from alxlo May 23, 2025 13:00
@sippsack sippsack linked an issue May 23, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Contributor

@alxlo alxlo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would expect more than one raised eyebrow when discussing this in a training session and perceive the wording as ... unusual. I definitely would have to make some mental somersaults to guess what it means. See proposals for changes.

<stem>
<text xml:lang="de">Sie versuchen, Ihre Architektur qualitativ zu analysieren. Was sind die ZWEI zutreffendsten Anzeichen für architektonische Problembereiche?</text>
<text xml:lang="en">You try to analyze your architecture quantitatively. Which are the two most appropriate indicators for architectural problem areas?</text>
<text xml:lang="de">Sie versuchen, Ihre Architektur quantitativ zu vermessen. Was sind die ZWEI zutreffendsten Anzeichen für architektonische Problembereiche?</text>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
<text xml:lang="de">Sie versuchen, Ihre Architektur quantitativ zu vermessen. Was sind die ZWEI zutreffendsten Anzeichen für architektonische Problembereiche?</text>
<text xml:lang="de">Sie versuchen, Ihre Architektur quantitativ zu bewerten. Was sind die ZWEI zutreffendsten Anzeichen für architektonische Problembereiche?</text>

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hast Du eine Begründung, warum Dein Wording besser sein soll? (Für "messen" gibt's eine Definition, was Du mit "quantitativ bewerten" meinst, weiß ich nicht.

<text xml:lang="de">Sie versuchen, Ihre Architektur qualitativ zu analysieren. Was sind die ZWEI zutreffendsten Anzeichen für architektonische Problembereiche?</text>
<text xml:lang="en">You try to analyze your architecture quantitatively. Which are the two most appropriate indicators for architectural problem areas?</text>
<text xml:lang="de">Sie versuchen, Ihre Architektur quantitativ zu vermessen. Was sind die ZWEI zutreffendsten Anzeichen für architektonische Problembereiche?</text>
<text xml:lang="en">You are trying to quantitatively measure your architecture. What are the TWO most appropriate indicators for architectural problem areas?</text>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
<text xml:lang="en">You are trying to quantitatively measure your architecture. What are the TWO most appropriate indicators for architectural problem areas?</text>
<text xml:lang="en">You are trying to evaluate your architecture quantitatively. What are the TWO most appropriate indicators for architectural problem areas?</text>

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See above.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

question 38: use quantitative measurement instead of analyze

4 participants