Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor ipfs p2p #4929

Merged
merged 44 commits into from
Sep 13, 2018
Merged

Refactor ipfs p2p #4929

merged 44 commits into from
Sep 13, 2018

Conversation

magik6k
Copy link
Member

@magik6k magik6k commented Apr 10, 2018

Fixes #4895.

TODO:

  • Reorganize the code
  • Fix/Cleanup registry logic
  • Make dial work more like ssh -L
  • Update docs
  • Review / discuss ideas

@magik6k magik6k requested a review from Kubuxu as a code owner April 10, 2018 12:51
@ghost ghost assigned magik6k Apr 10, 2018
@ghost ghost added the status/in-progress In progress label Apr 10, 2018
Copy link
Member

@Stebalien Stebalien left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still needs race condition fixes in the registration logic but this is definitely looking better.

@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ can transparently connect to a p2p service.
return
}

addr, peer, err := ParsePeerParam(req.Arguments()[0])
_, peer, err := ParsePeerParam(req.Arguments()[0])
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Se should be adding this address to the peerstore (with a temporary TTL) if non-empty.

p2p/outbound.go Outdated
}

switch lnet {
case "tcp", "tcp4", "tcp6":
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any reason to check this? I'd just listen and see if it fails.

p2p/outbound.go Outdated
ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(l.ctx, time.Second*30) //TODO: configurable?
defer cancel()

err := l.p2p.peerHost.Connect(ctx, pstore.PeerInfo{ID: l.peer})
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Calling NewStream will implicitly call Connect.

@magik6k magik6k changed the title [WIP] Cleanup ipfs p2p [WIP] Refactor ipfs p2p May 26, 2018
@magik6k magik6k force-pushed the misc/cleanup-p2p branch 2 times, most recently from a6db350 to 768d2a0 Compare May 26, 2018 14:35
@magik6k magik6k changed the title [WIP] Refactor ipfs p2p Refactor ipfs p2p May 26, 2018
ShortDescription: "Create and manage listener p2p endpoints",
Tagline: "Forward connections to or from libp2p services",
ShortDescription: `
Forward connections to <listen-address> to <target-address>. Protocol specifies
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is there a 'from' missing in this sentence?


**On the "server" node:**

First, start your application and have it listen on `$APP_PORT`.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe clarify that this is a tcp socket being listened on, such as an ssh or http server.

Then, configure the p2p listener by running:

```sh
> ipfs p2p forward /kickass/1.0 /ipfs /ip4/127.0.0.1/tcp/$APP_PORT
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

whats the /ipfs in the middle for?

Copy link
Member Author

@magik6k magik6k Jun 2, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's the listen address. I could also make it accept the node peerid. I just wanted one command to handle forwarding in both directions.

It would be cleaner if we could specify this as a multiaddress. We'd need to define a multiaddr proto for string protocol names, probably something like /mux/protoName. With that the command wouldn't have to accept magic strings, and the protocol name could get integrated with the address. Creating a libp2p service would look like

ipfs p2p forward /mux/someProto /ip4/127.0.0.1/tcp/$APP_PORT

And forwarding local connections to a service:

ipfs p2p forward /ip4/127.0.0.1/tcp/$APP_PORT /ipfs/QmPeer/mux/someProto

Does that make more sense?

edit: typo: s/ipfs p2p/ipfs p2p forward/

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, that makes sense... Its just a bit confusing. It would be nice to be able to make that simpler somehow. @Stebalien @Kubuxu @schomatis thoughts?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm getting the error Error: protocol name must be within '/p2p/' namespace while trying to replicate the example (to better understand this conversation as I don't really know much about libp2p).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, I get it now, changing /kickass/1.0 to /p2p/kickass/1.0 fixes that and the netcat example is working.

Copy link
Member Author

@magik6k magik6k Jun 3, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh, should update that too (edit: done)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So, going back to the original question, what seems confusing to me (again, I know nothing about libp2p so feel free to ignore this comment) is to have the p2p port in the front, which seems as if the forwarding is happening only at the p2p layer when in fact the message is routed through different layers (p2p-TCP).

If there were only two arguments (as suggested by @magik6k's solution that for me would be the ideal case) then the from-to relationship would become more evident, but if that isn't possible at the moment I would rather have two different commands that would clearly indicate to the user when the message is received at the p2p layer and routed to the TCP layer (and when the other way around); or at least I would reorganize the command arguments to group the p2p protocol with the p2p address.

p2p/local.go Outdated
p2p *P2P
id peer.ID

proto string
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe make this the protocol.ID type?

p2p/listener.go Outdated
// ListenerRegistry is a collection of local application proto listeners.
type ListenerRegistry struct {
Listeners map[listenerKey]Listener
lk *sync.Mutex
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why a pointer to a mutex?

Forward connections to <listen-address> to <target-address>. Protocol specifies
the libp2p protocol to use.

To create libp2p service listener, specify '/ipfs' as <listen-address>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To create a libp2p service listener

"ls": p2pListenerLsCmd,
"open": p2pListenerListenCmd,
"close": p2pListenerCloseCmd,
//TODO: Do we really want/need implicit prefix?
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thoughts on this?
Would it cause any restrictions or confusion, with or without them?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It basically restricts one from communicating with libp2p services not in /p2p namespace (so e.g. you can't use this to talk to other peers' bitswap which uses /ipfs/bitswap/1.1.0 as protocol name). The restriction was there before (probably put there by me), but now I'm not sure if we really want/need it.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It probably makes sense to make the user always type /p2p/foo even if we restrict them to that namespace. That way, in the future, if we remove that restriction, we don't have to do anything weird.


First, configure the p2p dialer to forward all inbound connections on
`127.0.0.1:SOME_PORT` to the listener behind `/p2p/kickass/1.0` on the server
node.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

First, configure the p2p dialer to forward all inbound connections on 127.0.0.1:SOME_PORT to the listener behind /p2p/kickass/1.0 on the server node.

It may be fine as is, but I wonder if this is more clear.

First, configure the client p2p dialer, so that it forwards all inbound connections on 127.0.0.1:SOME_PORT to the server node listening on /p2p/kickass/1.0.

},
Arguments: []cmdkit.Argument{
cmdkit.StringArg("protocol", true, false, "Protocol identifier."),
cmdkit.StringArg("listen-address", true, false, "Listening endpoint"),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing full stop

"Listening endpoint."

cmdkit.StringArg("Protocol", true, false, "Protocol identifier."),
cmdkit.StringArg("BindAddress", false, false, "Address to listen for connection/s (default: /ip4/127.0.0.1/tcp/0)."),
Options: []cmdkit.Option{
cmdkit.BoolOption("headers", "v", "Print table headers (HagndlerID, Protocol, Local, Remote)."),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

HagndlerID -> HandlerID

@@ -182,9 +182,11 @@ func pingPeer(ctx context.Context, n *core.IpfsNode, pid peer.ID, numPings int)
}

func ParsePeerParam(text string) (ma.Multiaddr, peer.ID, error) {
// to be replaced with just multiaddr parsing, once ptp is a multiaddr protocol
idx := strings.LastIndex(text, "/")
idx := strings.LastIndex(text, "/ipfs/")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's a few instances of the literal string "/ipfs/" in the package, would it be better to declare it as a named const?
e.g. peerPrefix or something

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ideally we'd parse those as a multiaddr, but for that we'd need to define new multiaddr proto for that.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/ipfs is a multiaddr protocol. That comment may be old. Actually, I believe this entire function is old. Use ParseString from the go-ipfs-addr package.

p2p/remote.go Outdated
p2p *P2P

// Application proto identifier.
proto string
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If protocol.ID type is used in local, change must be made here too

p2p/local.go Outdated
return l.p2p.peerHost.NewStream(l.ctx, l.peer, protocol.ID(l.proto))
}

func (l *localListener) acceptConns() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not in this PR, but there's opportunity for logging errors inside of here. Maybe later if a p2p log-subsystem is added.

@whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member

@magik6k It would be great if you could write up a separate document/tutorial on using ipfs p2p to tunnel ssh connections. I think a specific actionable example would really make the possibilities here click for a lot of people

@whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member

@magik6k cool, looking pretty good. Last thing I want (aside from getting approvals from @Kubuxu and one other) is a comment I can link to explaining how existing users can update their workflow to work with the changed API. Probably worth posting that comment here: #3994 and then updating my main comment to reflect these changes

@magik6k
Copy link
Member Author

magik6k commented Jun 3, 2018

Rebased + Updated the comment and added a summary in #3994 (comment)

@magik6k magik6k force-pushed the misc/cleanup-p2p branch 2 times, most recently from ca4ca83 to 39f6ab2 Compare June 6, 2018 11:28
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Magiera <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Magiera <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Magiera <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Magiera <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Magiera <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Magiera <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Magiera <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Magiera <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Magiera <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Magiera <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Magiera <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Magiera <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Magiera <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Magiera <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Magiera <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Magiera <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Magiera <[email protected]>
@magik6k
Copy link
Member Author

magik6k commented Sep 11, 2018

Rebased

p2p/remote.go Outdated
}

func (l *remoteListener) Close() error {
_, err := l.p2p.ListenersP2P.Deregister(string(l.proto))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now that we're just registering by protocol, this is going to have that close race condition we discussed. That is, if I try to close a listener forwarding to a specific local address twice while someone else is trying to open a listener (to a different local address), I can close their listener.

I believe the correct fix is to just do everything inside the listener manager. That is, no listener handles, etc. Just add a Close(...) method to the listener's object that takes the close "constraints" (protocol, localAddr, remoteAddr).

Does that make sense? This is what I meant by reducing some of the abstractions.

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Magiera <[email protected]>
@magik6k
Copy link
Member Author

magik6k commented Sep 12, 2018

I've added Listeners.Close, looks like an improvement. I've also tried to merge Listeners and Listener further, but it resulted in +100 messy lines of duplicated code, so that got hit with reset --hard.

@Stebalien
Copy link
Member

🎉

I think this has received enough review (4) and we haven't changed the interfaces in most of this review so I'm going to go ahead and merge it. It's not too late to make changes but we should try to make them before the next release (in case anyone gets cold feet and wants to change this).

@Stebalien Stebalien merged commit 2de6163 into master Sep 13, 2018
@ghost ghost removed the status/in-progress In progress label Sep 13, 2018
@Stebalien
Copy link
Member

Also, @magik6k: ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️

@Stebalien Stebalien deleted the misc/cleanup-p2p branch September 13, 2018 23:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants